Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Too bad DisplayPort doesn't offer the same amount of bandwidth to audio that HDMI does. So while it claims support for the audio codecs blu-ray uses, it can't fully support them.

Really? What is the MDP bandwidth cap compared to the latest HDMI spec?

But even if the bandwidth for MDP is too limited from transferring high definition audio, it wouldn't be relevant anyway, since Apple doesn't even support blu-ray yet, if ever, and iTunes would probably be the last digital distribution service to support HD audio. And even then, I think lossless audio over DD is a far ways off.
 
Just as a clarification, Apple did not simply accept Mini DisplayPort as an alternative to HDMI, they CREATED it! They then said they would license this for free. Some Toshiba Laptops have already adopted it.

But MiniDisplayPort was created as a smaller version of the already existing DisplayPort standard, which was already superior to HDMI (the only thing worse was the types of audio streams it could carry, which is fixed in DP 1.2 - it now can carry all the same audio streams as HDMI)
 
Not quite. Both are compact AV interfaces for transmitting uncompressed digital data. HDMI was just a little earlier to the party, thus widely adopted by the television industry. Televisions are not nearly as concerned with space limitations (not all that much yet anyway) thus making the HDMI standard acceptable. Televisions also do not yet need the greater capabilty that DisplayPort offers (17.2 GBit/s vs 10.2) but also the possibility of multiple independent video streams over one cable.

Look at who standardized Displayport and who is backing it. VESA and the computer industry. It is a "made for computers" alternative to HDMI. Apple did the right choice for their computers (notice how the Apple TV doesn't use it).
 
My question is can the "limited edition" unibody macbooks with mini-display port support audio over a firmware update. I ask this because the logic board was completely revamped when they added firewire and the card reader so it is possible that the MDP was changed too.
 
So what about all the other models with miniDP???
The limitation in those models is in the chipset. The 2008/2009 Intel and nVidia chipsets did not physically support audio out through the GPU path.
There was a thread a long time ago that proved that the MDP DID in fact carry audio. So yes, the older ones do have the ability to carry it. Now we just need someone to figure out how to enable it.
The DP (and mini DP) connector itself was never the problem. The connectors and cables will carry audio if the output device supports it. There were no notebook chipsets that did so until about 6-8 months ago (between Apple product refreshes). The 2008 models are absolutely incompatible; the 2009 models probably are, unless there are features of the 9400M that have not been disclosed by nVidia or were customized for Apple. This is unlikely and so they too are most likely physically incompatible.
If I understand it correctly, if the port's controller (I'm pretty sure it's the graphics chip) supports audio then it's just a firmware update to tell the controller to pass audio over the specified pins. If the port's controller doesn't support audio, then it's a hardware problem and can only be fixed by purchasing an up to date MBP.
That's correct.
oh please, this is only about Apple not wanting to pay HDMI patent fees. otherwise they would join the standard.
It has exactly nothing to do with that. HDMI was never suited for high resolution monitor applications--its niche is multimedia/home theater. It has several distinct limitations compared to DisplayPort, some of which are fixable and many of which are simply structural to the HDMI standard. DisplayPort (which is a joint project involving dozens of major players in home theater, mobile, and personal computer industries, and by no means just Apple) fixes many of those inherent limitations while preserving compatibility with HDMI, which will continue in home theater applications.
Right. But if the audio pins are on the mDP by default (and it sounds like they are) then Apple would have had to just not connect them (for no reason) in order for them to not already be connected to the sound card in older uMBPs.
The audio pins on the connector aren't connected to anything on the motherboard. That's the whole problem. nVidia's GPUs simply didn't support it until the most recent generation. All notebooks from all manufacturers are hardware-limited to video only over DisplayPort, except for certain models released in the past 8 months.
Have you seen mini HDMI ports? Part of the 1.3 spec released in 2006. Same size as mini DisplayPort. Apple only chooses DisplayPort because its royalty free
Apple chose DisplayPort because it's what's next. Intel, Dell, Pioneer, AMD/ATI, nVidia, Acer, Lenovo, HP, Phillips, and Samsung are all on board.
and they can charge outrageous prices for adapters. Those $30 adapters are pure profit.
Apple would charge the same for adapters regardless of the one selected for inclusion in the products; consumers are free to buy adapters from whomever they wish at whatever price they're willing to pay.
If Apple had done what the rest of the industry did and moved towards HDMI,
The rest of the industry did no such thing. HDMI is a freebie with DVI. All you have to do is change the physical connector. The signals are electrically compatible. The problem is that DVI is a dead end. Nobody "moved" to HDMI--they just added the connector for the convenience of those wanting to plug into HDTVs.
Look at who standardized Displayport and who is backing it. VESA and the computer industry. It is a "made for computers" alternative to HDMI. Apple did the right choice for their computers (notice how the Apple TV doesn't use it).
Exactly.
 
Really? What is the MDP bandwidth cap compared to the latest HDMI spec?

But even if the bandwidth for MDP is too limited from transferring high definition audio, it wouldn't be relevant anyway, since Apple doesn't even support blu-ray yet, if ever, and iTunes would probably be the last digital distribution service to support HD audio. And even then, I think lossless audio over DD is a far ways off.

According to wikipedia, DisplayPort offers 6.144Mbps total audio bandwidth. HDMI (all specs) support 36.86Mbps. Uncompressed PCM and DTS Master HD can support bitrates up to that level.

Apple chose DisplayPort because it's what's next. Intel, Dell, Pioneer, AMD/ATI, nVidia, Acer, Lenovo, HP, Phillips, and Samsung are all on board.

Yet very few of them actually use DisplayPort in their products or include it alongside HDMI.

And we've gone over this before. HDMI supports higher resolutions than DisplayPort, ethernet over the same cable, and HDMI has significantly more bandwidth available to audio. The only advantage of DisplayPort is multiple low-resolution displays daisy-chained on one cable.

Apple would charge the same for adapters regardless of the one selected for inclusion in the products; consumers are free to buy adapters from whomever they wish at whatever price they're willing to pay.

Apple would charge the same for their adapters? Is that why their mini DisplayPort adapters cost $10 more than their mini-DVI adapters?

The rest of the industry did no such thing. HDMI is a freebie with DVI. All you have to do is change the physical connector. The signals are electrically compatible. The problem is that DVI is a dead end. Nobody "moved" to HDMI--they just added the connector for the convenience of those wanting to plug into HDTVs.

It's funny you say that. Every single computer I've owned over the last few years that hasn't been a Mac, and every non-Mac GPU I've owned as well, has had HDMI out. On top of that, every respectable display sold for several years now has had HDMI. The industry DID move to HDMI. Only Apple has not. Apple is trying to force DisplayPort, but the popularity of DisplayPort to HDMI adapters shows that people don't want to go that route. Let's get this fact straight, Apple is the ONLY large-scale manufacturer of computers that DOES NOT use HDMI. EVERYONE else DOES.
 
RCA Video

Does anyone know if this means that with an adapter (like the older white MacBooks) that we can get an RCA / S-Video output from these new MacBook Pros without going through some type of transformer?
Any help is appreciated!
 
I like this

I don't need it, but I like that audio has been added to the Mini Display Port. It might be handy when traveling and there is a TV without a sound system to enhance it.

I run all audio through a good sound system when possible, so no problem with the extra wire.

I have been using Mac's since 1986, and they just keep getting better and better.
 
Does anyone know if this means that with an adapter (like the older white MacBooks) that we can get an RCA / S-Video output from these new MacBook Pros without going through some type of transformer?
Any help is appreciated!
The world would be a better place if you didn't.
 
I have the new 13" and it does not appear to pass through the Audio with the adapter. It may be only the 15" and 17".

Not good.

Edit:
Maybe not. Not sure if my adapter passes audio.
 
which one should I buy? 28awg or 32awg? those cables support audio and video for the new mbp line?

Cause HDMI won't support the larger resolution over 1080 like mini displayport can.

edit: Also, you don't have to buy an adapter. Just buy the display port to hdmi cable from monoprice. It's cheaper than buying the adapter plus an hdmi cable.
 
Knowing Apple, it doesn't matter. Even if its a software update, Apple will insist that hardware isn't capable, not offer it.
If they are not going to enable it on the previous models, then muck them with capital F! If they are really not going to do it, then definitely this is going to be my last laptop from them. It's a very nice machine, but I cannot stand this strategy anylonger.:(
Anyways, let's hope they will... :confused:
 
Why care to check the actual size and price of these adaptors if just plucking statements out of thin air allows one to put others (ie, Apple) down.

Only I happen to have the Mini DisplayPort to VGA adaptor and I have to use it each time I used a projector, connect my computer to a TV or connect it to any kind of monitor, so as far as I can tell, I have never ever come across anything that would plug into my MacBook Pro without an adapter. The adaptor was £20, which I think is very ridiculously expensive for a piece of plastic that allows me to use a port that is already on my computer. If I forget to take it with me to a presentation, I'm screwed and I have to transfer my files to someone else's "old" PC that of course has a VGA output built in, allowing them to connect their computer to anything without an adapter. I'm not saying VGA should be the way to go, but this still sucks, since VGA is still what everything uses, and I can't see the Mini DisplayPort being adopted anywhere, the only thing slowly making its way into stuff is HDMI, but even that isn't as common as VGA. And no matter how high-resolution Mini the DisplayPort is, there is nothing that supports it, except of course Apple's own displays, and since I don't own one, nothing that I use supports it. Oh and I bought this computer almost two years ago, and back then the Mini DisplayPort was new, but everyone said "oh it's industry standard and everyone is going to adopt it", now slowly as these computers go obsolete, this port is still nowhere to be found and they could've just put a VGA or HDMI on it and everything would have been so much simpler. If Apple wants their Mini DisplayPort to be used in most devices, they should do something about it, I don't know, convince manufacturers that it's the way to go! They have no problem doing that with Flash, so why not this?

Oh, and I think adapters like this should come free with the computer at least! Any other brand will give you loads of adapters with anything you buy, why not Apple?
 
Which brands give you loads of adapters when you buy a laptop? Several Dell's use DisplayPort (not mini) and include neither a cable or a DisplayPort - HDMI adapter.
 
Which brands give you loads of adapters when you buy a laptop? Several Dell's use DisplayPort (not mini) and include neither a cable or a DisplayPort - HDMI adapter.

Even more curious, I have a new Dell business laptop with a DP adapter, and two new monitors with HDMI on them. Talk about adapter Hell.
 
Apple is the ONLY large-scale manufacturer of computers that DOES NOT use HDMI. EVERYONE else DOES...

Your post was riddled with half-truths and outright incorrect statements. But I will reply to only a couple.

First off, displayport is a VESA standard.

Next, check out the Dell e6400 notebook line. Displayport only.

Additionally, the four letters you didn't mention in your post, that seem to get ignored a lot in the HDMI to displayport comparisons: HDCP.

HDMI has it. Displayport does not.
 
The audio pins on the connector aren't connected to anything on the motherboard. That's the whole problem. nVidia's GPUs simply didn't support it until the most recent generation. All notebooks from all manufacturers are hardware-limited to video only over DisplayPort, except for certain models released in the past 8 months.

So the audio pins in the MiniDPs has, up untill now, been idle?

I talked to a girl at the salesteam of apple in skandinavia, but she wasn't able to confirm weather or not the MDP would carry an audiofeed. I think, just to be on the safe side, she denied this possibillity. But why woludn't apples sales team know this stuff. It can only be a possitive for them...

Anywho I wrote her an email with a link to the Ars Report asking her to confirm, or get someone else to do it...
 
It's funny you say that. Every single computer I've owned over the last few years that hasn't been a Mac, and every non-Mac GPU I've owned as well, has had HDMI out.

mosx the eternal "I'm right, you're all wrong" troll of Macrumors.

BTW, all GPUs I owned before HDMI was out had S-Video ports. Does that mean S-Video was a computer display option ? :rolleyes:

Displayport is mostly backed by AMD, Apple only provide the specs for Mini Displayport to VESA for inclusion in the standard. The whole industry is behind Displayport.

HDMI on computers is there for the same reason S-Video was before it. TV out.
 
PM me...Handbrake is really easy to use. I use it all the time! I just need to get a cable for my 13" MacBook to attach to my new Samsung 46" LED TV.

Too bad I could never get handbrake to rip DVD's properly. I would love to get me a mac-mini server to hook up in my living room or office. then I could just flip through all my videos, DVD movies, etc via remote instead of looking for the DVD of the movie I wanted to watch. not to mention stream Hulu, Joost, Crackle, and all the TV stations from the internet to my TV.

I am not one for reality shows, cable and satellite prices are rediculous; so on-demand TV is where is at at for me.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.