Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Like I said, this new headset will take about 8 generations before it will be hugely successful. Right now it’s just a expensive prototype project. Once you can put this on like a pair of glasses 👓 and mix in Apple’s Artificial Intelligence then this headset will sell like hotcakes 🥞
 
The iPad could have been a masterpiece if it ran Mac OS. It has 20 versions out there and still it's just a large iPhone. I use mine for flying and that's about it. Also run a pretty big YouTube review channel and not one time, ever, would I have even considered doing real music production or film editing on the iPad over my MacBook Pro. People say "well if you put macOS on iPad it'll run into Mac sales....so WHAT? IT GOES IN THE SAME POCKET, who cares, let it.
The iPad is, has been and always will be held back from any full potential as long as it runs a glorified iPhone OS. I don't even see a difference between just having a iPad Air vs a pro. Ah, yes, the camera ...which is still **** on both...
Apple owns over 50% of the tablet market but only about 10% of the PC market. They cannot afford to lose PC marketshare because then the pros will all leave them but they can afford to lose tablet marketshare to their own Macs.
 
I think macOS on the iPad wouldn’t ruin Mac sales, it would ruin iPad sales. There is a tech bubble (including Gurman) that believes macOS on the iPad would be a good idea, but the iPad concept has defeated every tablet PC competitor in the market, and generates the same revenue as the Mac even if no models were launched this year. The iPad is not as huge as the iPhone, sure, but it’s an enormous success.
Very true. There have been plenty of tablet from factor decides with a more desktop OS and it simply hasn’t been successful. Sure the people who frequent macrumors probably would prefer it but it’s clear the overall market doesn’t particularly want that. Personally I wish you could dual boot an iPad but I get why Apple would never do that.
 
The iPad could have been a masterpiece if it ran Mac OS. It has 20 versions out there and still it's just a large iPhone. I use mine for flying and that's about it. Also run a pretty big YouTube review channel and not one time, ever, would I have even considered doing real music production or film editing on the iPad over my MacBook Pro. People say "well if you put macOS on iPad it'll run into Mac sales....so WHAT? IT GOES IN THE SAME POCKET, who cares, let it.
The iPad is, has been and always will be held back from any full potential as long as it runs a glorified iPhone OS. I don't even see a difference between just having a iPad Air vs a pro. Ah, yes, the camera ...which is still **** on both...
There's a lot of differences between them. The screen is a huge one.

For me iPad is my primary mobile device, and the only reason why this works is due to Stage Manager.

I don't want iPad to run MacOS. I would like better file management, however.
 
Like iphone 4...app store, enough performance, good form and so on..
This 100%. I mean, just because it took the iphone 4 iterations to get there (for the most part) doesn't mean VP will only (or necessarily) take 4 revisions. In a few years we will look back and laugh about the fact that the thing had to be viced onto your head... remember when the iphone had no copy/paste?
 
My god is Gurman dumb. He has sources, obviously, but that is the only thing keeping him afloat. His own „analysis“ is just incredibly shallow.
Here’s a summary of his “in-depth evaluation”:
  • Apple should drop the Solo Knit Band.
  • The pass-through cameras aren’t up to snuff.
  • The displays sometimes produce blurriness or glare, and the FOV feels like binoculars.
  • Eye/hand tracking doesn’t always work, especially in low light or reclined position.
  • Battery life is too short, as is the battery cable.
  • Even the native apps aren’t alway easy to use with eye-tracking (targets too small).
  • General bugginess.
  • Mac accessories aren’t visible when working in an Environment (unlike one’s hands).
  • Personas are phenomenal and groundbreaking.
  • Usability of app launcher and window management isn’t great.
  • Surprising lack of native/immersive apps and immersive contents.
  • Essentially a prototype at this stage.
 
The iPad could have been a masterpiece if it ran Mac OS. It has 20 versions out there and still it's just a large iPhone. I use mine for flying and that's about it. Also run a pretty big YouTube review channel and not one time, ever, would I have even considered doing real music production or film editing on the iPad over my MacBook Pro. People say "well if you put macOS on iPad it'll run into Mac sales....so WHAT? IT GOES IN THE SAME POCKET, who cares, let it.
The iPad is, has been and always will be held back from any full potential as long as it runs a glorified iPhone OS. I don't even see a difference between just having a iPad Air vs a pro. Ah, yes, the camera ...which is still **** on both...
Yep. It’s Apple’s own fault if the iPad is struggling to be seen as a Mac replacement.

I don’t think that is or ever was the goal in reality. That was just marketing.
 
Neither the iPad nor the watch have ever clicked with me. The macbooks and iPhone do almost everything better than the iPad. As for the watch I hate wearing things which doesn't bode well for Vision Pro for me. I'll never get past wearing goggles on my face.

I am very cautious with tech. There is a lot of it that is just more trouble than it is worth. Current version of Vision Pro is one. Surround sound, spatial audio, 192K sample rates, MQA, homepods, instant pots, airfryers(?), to name a few, all more trouble than they are worth.

Gone are the days of getting excited about something simply because it is new. Gotta show me first.
Air fryers and pressure cookers is an insane thing to include in this lmao
 
Getting to that size is pretty easy, if you do like Bigscreen Beyond and build absolutely no processing or tracking into the headset!
This is what Apple should have done. Make the headset nice and light and have a larger brick for the battery, computing, fans, etc. Weren't there rumors a year or two ago about using an iPhone for the processing and Wifi 6E for the connection? Not unlike wireless Vive that came out years ago. Maybe they tried it and wasn't good enough. But when this thing can be 4-6 oz on the head we'll see a lot of adoption. Until then it's a tough sell.
 
Neither the iPad nor the watch have ever clicked with me.

The iPad is my main connected device when not working.
I tolerate the watch merely for daily POS transactions and glancing to see who sent a text or email. Otherwise it is useless and unstylish so I wear a different watch.

Gone are the days of getting excited about something simply because it is new. Gotta show me first.

Exactly. The Vision Pro has no place in my lifestyle. It’s a gimmicky toy/gaming device and I don’t need either and have no motivation to convince myself that I do. In my eyes Apple‘s reputation has suffered greatly and no better than other tech companies.
 
contact lenses is the end goal for sure but it seems so far away...like how does that even work? how does it display anything your eye can focus on and how is it powered? contacts need to be soft and flexible so how can you put any kind of tech in that? your eye is natural moist so how do you get electricals functioning in it?

yeah maybe in a couple decades. we'll see the tech packed into a basic pair of glasses. even that feels like it's far away. i'm curious to see how apple can shrink the hardware down to fit into a slim glasses style product. i saw a concept render of such a thing and though yeah that's where this is heading. it's just going to take a long time. processor shrinks are hitting a wall so i don't know how much more smaller/efficient they can get and power source is a major issue. we really need advances on battery technology.
Contacts will require very little power so the natural body heat generated off our eyes might be enough to power it. Tiny nano batteries could also power contacts for hours or even days. By the time we approach that tech level, there will tech in place that we cannot even imagine right now so I'm not worried.

Apple's secret has always been their conservative view of technology. They never rush to market because they know it will always take longer to perfect an experience than everyone else estimates, including Apple themselves.

We will see a spinoff of AVP in about 5 years but it will be in the form of smaller glasses and use a completely different display technology closer to AR than the current MR or VR of AVP. If they can manufacture a large portion of the glasses from solid state battery, it can take on any shape and literally be the entire frames of the glasses. Then with the right antenna placement you can do all the computing off device and transmit wirelessly. Then all you need to add is the display technology in or just above the lenses. Or they could compute on device for less latency but more weight and heat and less battery life. There are a few ways to go here so it will be exciting to see what they pick and what works. But rest assured, Apple will not do it first, but they have the best chance of doing it best.
 
There will be apps using AI that can turn any 2D Video into 3D very soon.

All what it needs is depth measuring AI (which already exist, Tiktok demo'ed one).
That’s not quite true, because two eyes can see more from their respective combined angles than a single camera can capture. Besides the depths, the AI will also have to guess that missing information. It will be an imperfect approximation and will have glitches.
 
Well, that was going to be expected. But I remember thinking: "Those iPadOS - Apps look so much more useful with real multitasking in multiple windows and enough RAM". Kinda makes sense now.
 
This is what Apple should have done. Make the headset nice and light and have a larger brick for the battery, computing, fans, etc. Weren't there rumors a year or two ago about using an iPhone for the processing and Wifi 6E for the connection? Not unlike wireless Vive that came out years ago. Maybe they tried it and wasn't good enough. But when this thing can be 4-6 oz on the head we'll see a lot of adoption. Until then it's a tough sell.
I don’t think it’s feasible. You see how much compute is in this thing and it definitely cannot throughput that over thunderbolt let alone over WiFi
 
The iPad is my main connected device when not working.
I tolerate the watch merely for daily POS transactions and glancing to see who sent a text or email. Otherwise it is useless and unstylish so I wear a different watch.



Exactly. The Vision Pro has no place in my lifestyle. It’s a gimmicky toy/gaming device and I don’t need either and have no motivation to convince myself that I do. In my eyes Apple‘s reputation has suffered greatly and no better than other tech companies.
Not every product is going to be right for you specifically. I have no use for a MacPro that doesn’t mean no one does.
 
They are tech devices. Goes to larger point about bs tech. Think different!
I mean sure a pressure cooker is a technology in the same way a wheel is I wouldn’t say there is anything gimmicky about a pressure cooker something that has been around for many decades.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tagbert
The iPhone 4 is when the iPhone really matured and came into its own. But it was the iPhone 6 that solidified what we know as the ”modern” iPhone. I think Vision Pro is on a similar trajectory. It will mature in 4 generations, but it really won‘t be fully baked for another 2-3 generations after that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: windowsblowsass
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.