Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Maybe Apple should include a privacy cover then? They claim to be privacy focused but ironically leave their cameras completely exposed.

A 'privacy cover'..... 'Only in America' is the phrase that comes to mind!

As Apple states, the camera cannot come on without the light coming on so that's a first clue in the (very) unlikely event that it's been hacked. If you have decent firewall/anti-virus software then I'm not even sure how this is even going to happen anyway (unless you are one of those people that click on the link in those incredibly obvious scam emails).

Also, IF you do get hacked, I'm sure a privacy cover on your camera should be the least of your issues as the hackers will be able to get into more than just your camera!
 
In the past there's been hacks to bypass the light: https://jscholarship.library.jhu.edu/handle/1774.2/36569



Apple fixed the design, but it's not like it was impossible in the past.

arn

I suppose but if someone was really that interested in breaking into my Mac I'd be far more worried about the data on it. If you turn the camera on while I'm using it you're just going to see an unflattering angle of my ugly mug, not sure why anyone would necessarily want that. (this of course only applies to notebooks not desktops that are always exposed)
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: foliovision
In the past there's been hacks to bypass the light...Apple fixed the design, but it's not like it was impossible in the past.

As I understand it, those types of hacks do not work on MacBook family models with the T2 chip. So it could impact the current iMac (non-Pro).
 
Also, be careful and make sure there’s nothing near the hinge. If there’s a small pebble there and you close the lid, it’ll crack the bottom bezel.
 
I can’t just rely on simply checking my LED light if the camera is on. There are times that you’d rather not be seen but for some strange reason, your camera is on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zammir
I work in cybersecurity and I cover up my cameras as does everyone I know.

The cybersecurity "experts" at our work did that and I pointed out to them that it's a insignificant risk compared to microphones and KVM hacking. Anybody walking by an window could get the same view as the webcam, but we don't block windows. If you take your clothes off in your office, you got bigger problems.

On the other hand, they were deploying obsolete VOIP phones that were accessible from the desktop LAN with known flaws where you could listen in without any indication.

Webcam covers are mostly security theater.
 
As I understand it, those types of hacks do not work on MacBook family models with the T2 chip. So it could impact the current iMac (non-Pro).

Those hacks do not. But it's possible to take stills where the light only lights up for a millisecond.

from former Apple engineer regarding security of the webcams now:

So, no, I don’t believe that malware could be installed to enable the camera without lighting the LED. My concern would be a situation where a frame is captured so the LED is lit only for a very brief period of time.

arn
 
If Apple would stop obsessing over making everything wafer-thin then this probably wouldn't be an issue. Why does using a screen privacy protector risk damaging the PC?

We're a long way from the early days of Apple. I think the 1984 ad was prescient - Apple's gone from making PCs that are both aesthetically pleasing and easy to use to making (for the most part) pretty social-media boxes. Now it's like buying a car. It's all about either avoiding repairs or dealerproofing Apple products so you don't get shafted on a visit to the Apple Store.
 
Last edited:
Maybe Apple should include a privacy cover then? They claim to be privacy focused but ironically leave their cameras completely exposed.
On Macs equipped with T2 security chip, T2 acts as a gateway to both the microphone and camera. It is not possible for apps or even system level code to bypass the green LED indicator light when accessing camera.

If you think the green light is not prominent enough, and you almost never use the camera, then I suppose putting a tape or cover over the camera lens make some sense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: robbysibrahim
I have one of these camera covers. I simply can’t rely on a green light to prevent embarrassment when I accidentally activate my camera during a team meeting, when I’m sat on the sofa in my pants, eating ramen noodles with a head like a robber’s dog.

Nothing to do with hackers, security or the NSA. It’s to protect me from my own stupidity and God knows I can be stupid.
 
That is correct. There is malware that can circumvent the light going on when the camera is active on Windows and macOS, but as I understand it on T2-equipped MacBook models, this is not possible because the webcam is controlled from the T2.
The circuit is still not physically connected, the camera could be used if the T2 gets cracked(unlikely I know). Apple should physically wire it so that if the camera is powered the light will light up. Then there would be no way to access the camera without the light turning on.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.