It only worked with a case.There have been other smartphones with 'magsafe' in the past without this issue, ie Palm Pre. To be fair it was designed such that using a case wasn't as important.. anyone remember when phones were durable enough to be used without cases? Yea Apple started the whole delicate-scratch-gate stuff with iPods.
The Touchstone Charger requires compatible back cover, which also is sold separately for the Pre, while the Pre Plus comes with the touchstone-compatible back cover included.
It only worked with a case.
I share your sentiment. At the same time, it appears that Apple released a product that pretty much damages the case right away (and will possibly damage the phone as well, if one doesn’t use a case. That doesn’t seem right to me. I expect my case to get damaged through normal use by protecting the phone. However, if I buy an Apple made accessory that damages the case through correct usage, I consider that a fault of the vendor and would seek restitution from Apple, as well as immediately stop the specific accessory usage.I always thought most (or all) folk buy a case in order to protect the phone, treating the case as the sacrificial skin. In other words, there's an expectation of the case protecting the phone from drops as well as wear over time from "normal things" like putting it in your pocket, resting it on a table repeatedly, etc. I'm not saying you're wrong for wanting a case to remain perfect but I do think that's a pretty impossible ask.
For some reason I remember it being bulkier than that...No, it wasn't a 'case', the Pre had a removable back plate, unlike the iPhone, so basically you'd buy this back cover, and replace the stock one. The video below shows how you'd attach/detach it:
Edit: Rewatching that video is so interesting, that was 2009! They were truly ahead of their time.
You are on MacRumors. Many people here fret and have to take medication if they see fingerprints on the phone after normal use. This place is a breeding ground for Apple hypochondriac syndrome.do people really care if the case is scratched? 🤦♀️
Trying to understand the actual advantage. You connect and disconnect a lightning cable and you’ll attach and detach this thing due to its magnetic strength, with either technique you’ll fumble and have to hold both the phone and MagSafe to detach - what’s the solid advantage of this product? That you simply feel cooler charging wirelessly ? I don’t get it...
do people really care if the case is scratched?![]()
I'd still say less problems with Megsasafe on Mac. Compared to this, all you gotta care about is dust
Convience pays off yet again.
Trying to understand the actual advantage. You connect and disconnect a lightning cable and you’ll attach and detach this thing due to its magnetic strength, with either technique you’ll fumble and have to hold both the phone and MagSafe to detach - what’s the solid advantage of this product? That you simply feel cooler charging wirelessly ? I don’t get it...
Nah, the imprint is a token of you using latest technology.you're charging it wrong
Oh dear! This is very unApple like. I reckon they didn't realise this during testing and have only found out recently. Not good. I'm sure some heads will be rolling.
On the other hand this could be a tempest in a teapot, similar to the iPhone bending issue of yesteryear.I hope so. Quality control should’ve caught this let alone designers should’ve foreseen this and made the entire contact area non touching any metal for any potential.
just pure laziness and half-stepping! Necks should be smacked with much enthusiasm at Apple to those involved with MagSafe’s design (wallet included)
I thought that was the POINT of the case.do people really care if the case is scratched? 🤦♀️
There is no denying the iphone 12 looks great but I sometimes think they release some accessories as a joke and take bets on how many gullible people they can convince to buy them.