If you really wanted to be green you wouldn't buy an Apple Watch in the first place.Good move. I’m all for saving animals.
If you really wanted to be green you wouldn't buy an Apple Watch in the first place.Good move. I’m all for saving animals.
Billions of (potential iPhone owning) people all over the world avoid cow or pig leather for religious reasons. There’s no point winding up potential customers when you can just outsource any potential reputational risk to third party case manufacturers.Customers in what market exactly are offended by leather?
Not at all the same thing.Future generations will be horrified that primitive humans used the skin of murdered beasts as a fashion accessory.
Nothing says 'dumb' and 'brainwashed' more than people who are horrified by fur - but cool with leather.
They're the exact same thing.
Not sure what a leather watch band has to do with „Billions of (potential iPhone owning) people all over the world“ buying or not buying iPhones.Billions of (potential iPhone owning) people all over the world avoid cow or pig leather for religious reasons. There’s no point winding up potential customers when you can just outsource any potential reputational risk to third party case manufacturers.
Not sure what a leather watch band has to do with „Billions of (potential iPhone owning) people all over the world“ buying or not buying iPhones.
Btw: You don‘t have to buy a leather band or case, plenty of alternative options are already available.
I’m giving this a heart because there’s more truth here than very well likely to be in the PR angle evident around launchThis drives me crazy - I’m a leather technician and if people understood leather is made from taking a byproduct (waste, if you like) of the meat industry, and reusing it as a sustainable, long lasting material. What do we think happens if we don’t use these hides for leather - they go to landfill 🤷♂️ I’m all for apple creating different bands/using different materials, but don’t tell me something synthetic, bound by acrylics, is going to be more sustainable and better for the environment. The move by apple for sure is to appear ‘greener’ to certain consumers, but in reality will come down to cost savings.
I see people commenting that they are all for saving animals - but animals typically used for leather (Bovine) are never killed for the hides - they are killed for the meat.
These animals will be slaughtered if apple makes leather bands or not.
They aren’t.I fail to see how synthetic materials, which needs chemicals and energy to produce, aren't durable, and need thousands of year to be degraded, are better for the environment than animal skin... 🤔
There will be companies offering cases and watch bands made of leather (cheap toxic ones from China, high priced ones from eg Hermes), so customers have a choice.Very sad day. I think it is pathetic if Apple gets rid of their leather watch bands and cases. Let the customers chose what to buy. Don’t make the decision for them.
That's because you probably don't know how leather is made.I fail to see how synthetic materials, which needs chemicals and energy to produce, aren't durable, and need thousands of year to be degraded, are better for the environment than animal skin... 🤔
Do you think Apple is a radical vegan group preaching to you not to use leather?Please let us leather fans alone. Why are there always some radical groups that want to force the decisions of others. Like there is only one right answer. I for example prefer eco friendly tanned leather that is disposable. I fully understand vegans and would never try to change their beliefs or would try to convince them to use natural products. Every vegan I know is like a preacher -.-
Please explain why the skin of one animal is OK to use as clothing/accessory and that of another animal is not?In what world do you think that these are the same thing? It is baffling. Before you start using the words ‘dumb’ & ‘brainwashed’, I strongly urge you to do some research.
No need to end the partnership!
Apple Watch Hermès Edition with new Nylon Bands reimagined 👀 🫠
Credit: Parker Ortolani
Actually, leather is not "naturally occurring", but it is produced from a natural resource (animal skin), mostly using quite toxic chemicals to stop the "earthly product" from decay.because leather requires extra steps to create as it is a naturally occurring, earthly product.
Leather has been produced for 4 millenniaActually, leather is not "naturally occurring", but it is produced from a natural resource (animal skin), mostly using quite toxic chemicals to stop the "earthly product" from decay.
The animals are already being eaten. Might as well use the hide as to not waste. However, if this cuts down waste, then so be it.Not for the animals/environment. Not sure why it’s taken Apple so long to do this across their range to be honest.
It’s literally a professional telling you what happens, and you’re arguing with them. 🤦♂️This argument is absurd. Whether meat is a byproduct of leather or the opposite is just a matter of money and perspective. The companies that produce and kill these animals make a profit off of these abused animals, and the profit comes from different sources: meat, hair, skin, bones, etc...
These all make these industries viable and allow for more animals to be abused and our environment to be destroyed.
To think that cows would not be (or are not) killed solely for their leather is also very naive when you look at what people are doing for fur and other types of leather / skin.