The whole point is to get exposure for it and that's what this is doing. As will many other ad campaigns. That's how it works. If there was a Tag Heuer Monaco on her wrist many people would recognise it but many wouldn't. They might find out though if they like what they see.
Yes, white goes with a lot but she is wearing the sport band. She is clearly in workout or relaxing mode. The face in the watch tells you workout. That's why it's a good picture. The watch adds to the clues. There doesn't need to be 'Apple Watch' splashed over the screen.
Can I remind you of my original comment? "The article might be different - but looking at the cover image, I can't say the design looks any better or worse than any other offerings. It's not unique or any more interesting. Perhaps close up or whatnot. But this image shown (as others have pointed out) makes the watch barely noticeable."
None of your responses really counter that. It's also my opinion - which you're not likely to change. This cover may do amazing things for Apple's image and the Apple Watch. I never said otherwise. I simply said that the design excellence looks any better or worse than other smart watches I've seen.
I never said anything about it needing to have Apple splashed over it, etc.
You're free to voice your opinion, but I can't see how it really warrants a reply to what I wrote...