Cases on a watch look ridiculous, imo
It's still a really good looking watch. Plus, plenty of people must care or they wouldn't spend extra on stainless steel, titanium, ect.Yeah, but, I don’t think the watch owners care about aesthetics when it comes to practicality in terms of actually protecting the watch. We’re talking about a smart watch acting as a ‘wrist computer’, not a high-end mechanical watch like an Omega or Patek.
Cases on a watch look ridiculous, imo
It is if it's a bulky case, what if it's a minimalist one?
My SBTi has held up well. I tend to abuse watches and don’t use a case. The Titanium SB case is still perfect, but somehow I managed to scratch the sapphire screen pretty good. You can feel it with your fingernail.
I actually thought about carrying an Apple Watch around in my pocket without a strap as a way to get out of carrying an iPhone around -- a way to be reachable and have basic access to calendars and stuff without the distraction of a big fat iPhone screen.
But, from what I've heard the battery life just isn't quite there yet.
I’ve read very few cases of scratching the sapphire display, but it certainly is possible as you mentioned. I’m curious to what your display came into contact with that would’ve caused the scratch where you can literally feel it with your finger nail you mentioned. I’ve been fortunate, as I hit mine on the grill, walls, doors, you name it and it’s been flawless on the sapphire display. But then again, your post is definitely an example it’s not impervious to damage.
I've never used a case on my two Apple Watches that I've owned. I don't see the need since it stays attached to your wrist all day.Does anyone else carry their Apple Watch of course without a case ?
I'll put a case on my $400 Apple Watch right after I put one on my $9,000 Rolex and my $2,500 Tag.
I gather your sarcasm, but nobody would ever put a case on a Rolex or Tag Heuer, simply because those watches are aesthetically meant to be ‘shown-off’ for the hardware. Plus, The construction of those watches has substantial weight given the thickness of the steel are using, which why would you need a case on an expensive watch in the first place given the durability. I know I’m stating things that are obvious, but your comparison isn’t even appropriate given an Apple Watch doesn’t have nearly the level of ‘toughness’ that a high-end mechanical would include.
From all reports it seems like the SS SB is almost impossible to damage/scratchNaked. I might definitely be weird but I love how stainless steel gets after some time. Yes, it gets scratched and all but it almost makes it feel that much durable. I understand how people would like to protect something they spent money on but I dunno, I enjoy it. I felt more worried about the aluminum one, honestly. The SS is just much more durable and beautiful, in my opinion. Same thing with iPhone, sure, be careful, maybe slap a minimal case on the phone, but just enjoy it. These things lose value anyway, don't trash it but, go on living your life, you know?
I have the sport series 5 with no case. I think they do more harm than good because they get dirt and sand in them and scratch it up
I have the sport series 5 with no case. I think they do more harm than good because they get dirt and sand in them and scratch it up
I’m saying a case does more harm than having no case. I think dirt and sand gets under a case and scratches it
I’m saying a case does more harm than having no case.