$5,000 Dollars? I Rather buy a Rolex. I can feel confident my Rolex will hold value in say the next 5-10 years,
What do you do with an obsolete $5,000 watch? Sell it for scrap?
$5,000 Dollars? I Rather buy a Rolex. I can feel confident my Rolex will hold value in say the next 5-10 years,
The only reason why I would buy the $4000 watch is that 20 years later it will be a vintage worth 10 times the value.
What do you do with an obsolete $5,000 watch? Sell it for scrap?
It's timeless only because the people in the watch community decide that it be timeless, and the Rolex watch maintains its value insofar that there are people willing to pay for it.
....
Is nobody else not seeing what I'm seeing? The sapphire bottom of theWATCH looks made to come off to easily replace the battery, possibly upgrade the CPU and add new sensors.
Image
Apple must know that the renewal cycle of these watches can't be the same as an iPhone or even a Mac. If you're buying a gold watch, it's got to be good for at least 5 years or maybe much longer. If you can upgrade the fitness sensors and maybe the CPU, Apple can continue to make money annually or bi-annually fromWATCH owners.
I think this is the first time Apple has delved into fashion obscurity. This gold watch is only popular to people with enough money to throw it away after 5 years when Apple stops supporting it. I have a 100 year old pocket watch that is beautiful and keeps time and is worth way more than an Apple watch--because it's still relevant. Jony Ive's research into the merger of technology and hundreds of years of timekeeping is fail--well unless you're only interested in money, which Apple says they are not.
The watch is a necessity that has survived for hundreds of years. Did your first iMac survive?
I think the iWatch is a revelation to people that don't know the value of a watch. One that is passed down from generations. How many people continue to use the first iPhone?
I believe most people will not buy one at all.
Yep. They'll just buy another in a couple years though. At $4k, they can afford it. Plus, there will be some value left in it because of the gold if they choose to sell it.
That 4 grand is up there!
"may" and "could." This is not information.
Anyway... if Apple doesn't have a buyback program, someone else will.
And there will be plenty of 3rd-party bands too.
(Didn't someone calculate that the gold alone would cost over $10,000?)
The problem is not the Apple Watch is too expensive. The problem is you don't make enough money.
it must be... or else the pricing makes no sense. But I would wait for 2.0, as they will learn so much from 1.0
Ouch.
I like this idea very much. However, due to corporate greed I seriously doubt Apple would go to the trouble to make a product more affordable or extend its useful life. They haven't banked billions by enabling consumer efficiency.
The first generation Apple watch will be serious collector items where it will sell at 10x a few years later. Consider it an investment. I'm getting that super bling $4K Apple watch, never open the box and have it pay for my daughter's wedding in a few years.
----------
![]()