Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
What makes you think that's better? Because you like it?

The classic fail argument is saying something that is incredibly successful in reality would be more successful in theory if it only had some arbitrary design/functionality changes suggested by the person making the argument. That's silly.

You literally have no way of knowing how well the image would sell and zero reason to question the strategy for wearables by Apple. They are doing fantastic without your sage advice.
Hey galaxy watches look like that and sell like crap...so clearly how that looks doesn’t get people to switch
 
Don’t some expensive watches need to be sent in for servicing every couple of years? The price of that alone can get you an Apple Watch, so it feels like this would more or less cancel out in the long run.
I’ve seen one very expensive mechanical watch where the price includes a service in 2099. They need to replace one part (because 2100 is the first year in 200 years that is divisible by four but not a leap year).
 
The iWatch is pure garbage because it's a rectangle. Watches are round. Common sense. Putting function over form. Typical garbage Apple.
Not all analog watches are round, and putting function over form is just common sense.

iWatch is another outside the park home run for Tim Apple.

P.S. D to D minus. You gotta step up your troll game; you can do better!
 
  • Like
Reactions: I7guy
Did they factor in those return after 14 days!!??
Yes, some were returned, however all the folks I know having purchased a Apple Watch, none returned them; nor have they considered returning them. You asked a question thus one ? is enough.
 
I love my s5 but the upcoming generations need 64gb option and also way way improved music sync. the way and speed at which current watches sync music is pathetic.
 
I love my s5 but the upcoming generations need 64gb option and also way way improved music sync. the way and speed at which current watches sync music is pathetic.
Compared to the S3, it’s much much better. Technology moves fairly quickly so I wouldn’t doubt syncing continues to improve.
 
I’ve seen one very expensive mechanical watch where the price includes a service in 2099. They need to replace one part (because 2100 is the first year in 200 years that is divisible by four but not a leap year).

Assuming the company is even still around by then, or the owner’s descendants even remember that they have such a watch lying around.
 
Cost and value often don't match. The used price of an Apple Watch reflects the value buyers attribute to it (of course also modulated by the number of used Apple Watches that are available for purchase). Apple's trade-in price is largely set such that Apple can sell it on the used market with a (small) profit. It is thus reflects the value of a used Apple Watch.

Thinking that it (the trade-in price) indicates the production cost of an Apple Watch assumes that Apple would sell new Watches as used/refurbished (and thus sees the trade-in program and their own production chain as two alternative sources for their 'refurbished program'). But I really don't think Apple is feeding new Watches into its refurbished channel in any significant numbers (returns, trade-ins, and surplus stock when new models are released are feeding that channel). Therefore the trade-in price is really about value and not cost.
Clearly the used market deems nicer finishes as fluff as resale for SS and Aluminum are usually fairly close.

Other than Hermès bands and some other rare bands (and maybe the 24k Edition models) though, Watch resale sucks.


In regards to the Watch becoming independant I believe that will end up being like when Apple released the first Windows iPod, aka sales will explode.

PS: Series 0 sales must have been far lower considering how many people have the S5 as their first one!
 
A Rolex is a piece of jewellery which you can hand down from generation to generation. It never goes out of date.

Neither will a rock.

I guess I understand why some people adore luxury watches so much. My mom loves gold jewellery as well, and she rationalises her purchases by pointing out they retain their gold value at the end of the day.

That said, you can’t escape the gathering storm. Fitbit is just the first of many casualties as the Apple Watch gains in both popularity and functionality. And who knows where it will stop.

I am calling it now. As Apple continues to redefine what utility on the wrist entails, the next target will be the Swiss Watch industry. They have painted themselves into a corner by selling the wrist as a place for intangibles, and it’s painfully obvious that they just don’t have a legitimate way of responding to the Apple Watch.

Jony Ive may have alluded to this in jest, but I don’t think any of the Swiss watch manufacturers are laughing. Fossil, Garmin, the fallout will be like watching the titanic heading for the iceberg.

Fight it. Deny it. Try to run from it. Destiny will come for them all the same.
 
  • Like
Reactions: I7guy
Compared to the S3, it’s much much better. Technology moves fairly quickly so I wouldn’t doubt syncing continues to improve.

It doesn't need better tech, it just needs a sensible product manager. Currently I can't do 1:1 sync from the iPhone to the Watch. I can sync single songs, or I can sync playlists, which I can compile by adding songs one by one. Pain in the arse. Especially for me, as I literally don't have any playlists, I just shuffle my 2k+ songs all the time.

Also, if Apple had any innovative minds, they would allow me to put songs on the Watch in Opus encoding, which takes around half the bitrate (read: half the disk space) to sound the same. But they're just too stubborn and proud to push anything besides AAC. I'm yet to find a way to put Opus files even on my iPhone lol. I could copy one file to OneDrive, then download on the phone to "On My iPhone", then navigate there in the Files app, and then it would actually play beautifully... but that's it. It won't appear in the Music app ever. Opus is the best encoder you've never heard of. All current day OSes support it, it just doesn't have much integration. It's a shame.
 
A Rolex is a piece of jewellery which you can hand down from generation to generation. It never goes out of date.
An Apple Watch is a tool you can actually use every day for its multiple function. I can pass down $15 thousand to another generation and still get daily use of an Apple Watch.
 
Since I got a replacement battery life been good. Be better off having a S4 if you don’t use AOD
why ?
Since I passed my Series 4 to my son, I bought a new Series 5.
[automerge]1573408687[/automerge]
AW needs a redesign overhaul and the faux leather band looks embarrassingly cheap. It would have closer to 73% YoY growth if it looked more like this.

6360449_sd.jpg;maxHeight=1000;maxWidth=1000
it would be a nightmare as far as UI is concerned.
Just like any android / Tizen smartwatch.

I don't know what "faux leather band" you are referring. Apple sells genuine leather bands.
[automerge]1573409039[/automerge]
The iWatch is pure garbage because it's a rectangle. Watches are round. Common sense. Putting function over form. Typical garbage Apple.
i don't know what an "iWatch" is.
Maybe some Chinese ripoff ?

By the way, watches may be round (many are not), but we are speaking about SMARTwatches here. And using a square display they are actually putting FUNCTION over form.
Very poor trolling attempt.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: I7guy
that is the first thing I switched off on my series 5.
i tried it for a couple days and then decided it was a waste of battery life.
different tastes.
Okay you do know you can have paired more than one AW to your iPhone? I have both my S4 and my S5 paired to my iPhone 8. Somedays I wear my 4 and somedays I wear my 5 which is set to always on. I also have gold Omegas and an IWC stuck away in a drawer somewhere.....never used.
It's the weather data I find interesting (I have the CARROT app on my AWs)....eg humidity here where I live is 90% while in Sydney where they are expecting "catastrophic" fire conditions on Tuesday the humidity is 0%!!!!
 
Last edited:
Okay you do know you can have paired more than one AW to your iPhone? I have both my S4 and my S5 paired to my iPhone 8. Somedays I wear my 4 and somedays I wear my 5 which is set to always on. I also have gold Omegas and an IWC stuck away in a drawer somewhere.....never used.
It's the weather data I find interesting (I have the CARROT app on my AWs)....eg humidity here where I live is 90% while in Sydney where they are expecting "catastrophic" fire conditions on Tuesday the humidity is 0%!!!!
Yes I know but I think one Apple Watch is enough for me... until the next model.
 
I got the first Apple Watch on launch day in 2015 and I’ve had one ever since. I find it incredibly useful, in some ways almost as useful as my phone. I’ve never forgotten to wear it. I use mine to triage notifications and calls, to set reminders and timers, for Apple Pay, to locate my phone when I can’t find it, as a flashlight, to get quick information via Siri, as a calculator. I also use it for Audio and as a stand-alone device via cellular when I don’t have my phone with me.
 
The iWatch is pure garbage because it's a rectangle. Watches are round. Common sense. Putting function over form. Typical garbage Apple.

Cartier would differ with your assessment. Not one round smartwatch has come even close to the sales numbers of the Apple Watch.
 

Attachments

  • iu-1.jpeg
    iu-1.jpeg
    37.8 KB · Views: 82
  • iu.jpeg
    iu.jpeg
    46.2 KB · Views: 89
  • iu-2.jpeg
    iu-2.jpeg
    103.2 KB · Views: 89
Last edited:
There’s probably a very good reason Apple Watch doesn’t look like that. That reason could be a rectangular screen is better for displaying information, similar to a computer screen.

I really have to ask, “what info” because atleast i feel my apple watch is quite restricted to display the content. A smatwatch doesnt need to mimic a normal watch and use the whole display for huge clock or days or... it should be possible to show info which i need i could see once when checking the display - as it was on my former android smatwatch already on year 2012... if i want my smartwatch showing the same info as a normal watch, i rather get a normal watch then. I wish i could configure my apple watch as i was able to do with my sony smatwatch years ago...
 
I really have to ask, “what info” because atleast i feel my apple watch is quite restricted to display the content. A smatwatch doesnt need to mimic a normal watch and use the whole display for huge clock or days or... it should be possible to show info which i need i could see once when checking the display - as it was on my former android smatwatch already on year 2012... if i want my smartwatch showing the same info as a normal watch, i rather get a normal watch then. I wish i could configure my apple watch as i was able to do with my sony smatwatch years ago...
Cartiers’ watches are square. But I suppose different strokes for different folks.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.