Will that mean Apple won’t roll out promo advertising in Apple wallet for the EU?
Don’t know 🤷♂️. Depends how Apple is enforcing it. Can be devices sold like with the Apple Watch case or geolockedPractical question. Let's say an American with a MacBook Pro and iPhone (recent generations) goes to the E.U., let's say Germany if a specific location matters, for a month. And let's say his MacOS and iOS are up-to-date and have all the features working.
While he's in the E.U., do those features Americans have that the Europeans don't still work for him, or not?
What if he uses a VPN?
Conversely, what happens when a European tourist with a MacBook Pro and iPhone are in the United States?
What happens if a European tourist buys a MacBook Pro in the United States and sets it up here before going home? What happens when he gets home? Do the features quit working?
Personally I would never share my live location data with Google or Meta. But if others see value in this, why should they not be allowed to do it just because Apple says so?Or, they have serious concerns with companies like Google and Meta being able to get a list of literally every place you've ever been so they can sell ads against it. Because if Apple offers a feature, they have to let anyone else offer it too, per the DMA.
So is Apple interpreting the DMA more strictly than intended? Because I feel like that's the case. I just don't get how iPhone mirroring of all things cannot be implemented because of the DMA.An EU official present at the meeting apparently said the regulator and Apple disagree on the reach of the DMA and potential security risks.
Personally I would never share my live location data with Google or Meta. But if others see value in this, why should they not be allowed to do it just because Apple says so?
Apple knows the location of your device. They will disable some of the features that are mandated for EU customers when you stay outside Europe for a couple of weeks. I don't remember the details though. It was reported here on MR, but I can't find the article.What happens if a European tourist buys a MacBook Pro in the United States and sets it up here before going home? What happens when he gets home? Do the features quit working?
Apple for some reason (well not hard to guess) decide to be confrontational on every turn on every issue in democratic rule of law countries.So is Apple interpreting the DMA more strictly than intended? Because that seems to be the case. There's no way they are keeping iPhone mirroring from us because of the DMA. They're doing it to **** on their EU customers.
They (this user) don’t like it when they can’t use a small iOS feature, but surely they love it when they can use the warranty of a purchased good for 3 years since purchase date, 14 days no questions asked returns when online shopping, travel around countries with its national ID and same currency, have free roaming to navigate on those countries, healthcare too, European funds to get discounts for youth or programs for small business to grow… Along thousands of other benefits (like the freedom to modify your device without losing warranty)…C'mon - You can't really believe that.
NO ONE?
If someone sees value in constant location-sharing with Meta or Google, there’s a platform that supports that. But Apple shouldn’t be required to build its system around the preferences of people who fundamentally disagree with its philosophy.Personally I would never share my live location data with Google or Meta. But if others see value in this, why should they not be allowed to do it just because Apple says so?
The reason is if Apple offers a feature like iPhone Mirroring, they have to allow others to offer the same feature. Apple is never going to allow third-parties to completely control your iPhone remotely without the phone being unlocked. It's a serious privacy and security risk. They're just not going to do that.So is Apple interpreting the DMA more strictly than intended? Because I feel like that's the case. I just don't get how iPhone mirroring of all things cannot be implemented because of the DMA.
So you admit that Apple should and is allowed to make decisions for users?If someone sees value in constant location-sharing with Meta or Google, there’s a platform that supports that. But Apple shouldn’t be required to build its system around the preferences of people who fundamentally disagree with its philosophy.
It would work same as right now you can generate random credit card data for a random US address and enter that data into your icloud settings and get all those features working in EU but you will miss all the apps bought with your eu account. So with a legit US credit card credentials you can move around the world and the features will work with all your apps bought with that US credit card etc....reason why the whole Apple vs Eu is a huge bs and it is all about managing peoples data which Eu does not want to give permission to.Practical question. Let's say an American with a MacBook Pro and iPhone (recent generations) goes to the E.U., let's say Germany if a specific location matters, for a month. And let's say his MacOS and iOS are up-to-date and have all the features working.
While he's in the E.U., do those features Americans have that the Europeans don't still work for him, or not?
What if he uses a VPN?
Conversely, what happens when a European tourist with a MacBook Pro and iPhone are in the United States?
What happens if a European tourist buys a MacBook Pro in the United States and sets it up here before going home? What happens when he gets home? Do the features quit working?
My refrigerator manufacturer did not provide an ice cube maker function. The OUTRAGE!So you admit that Apple should and is allowed to make decisions for users?
Quick question:
does that also apply to other companies? Is your car manufacturer allowed to decide where you fill up and who you allow to ride with you? Is your refrigerator manufacturer allowed to decide what products you want to store?
Yes, absolutely. That's part of the deal with selecting Apple. I personally consider that a big advantage to Apple over Android, because it results in additional privacy and security, and fewer things I have to worry about with my parents/wife/kids' devices that I manage.So you admit that Apple should and is allowed to make decisions for users?
If consumers want that, sure.Quick question:
does that also apply to other companies? Is your car manufacturer allowed to decide where you fill up and who you allow to ride with you? Is your refrigerator manufacturer allowed to decide what products you want to store?
That's your opinion. Apple is allowed to have a different one. I personally think their opinion results in a better outcome for the vast majority of Apple's users, even if it is annoying for a smaller subset of Apple's users (who happen to be overrepresented on tech enthusiast forums like MacRumors).Or are you just twisting the facts?
Because Apple doesn't need to build the system around the preferences of people.
That's a lie from the company. They should just give users the choice.
If that's important to you, there is another platform.For example, if some wants to use an alternative browser, they can do so. If they don't want to, they can continue using Safari. Why is this choice a problem on iDevices?
iOS has over 10x the number of users of the Mac, including hundreds of millions of less technically inclined users. iOS was also designed from the ground up to be locked down much more than the Mac is. Phones also have much more personal and private data on them than most computers, and are carried with us everywhere we go. iPhones are significantly more secure than Macs because of these restrictions.Or, in your words: Why isn't Apple interested in its philosophy on the Mac?
Apple isn't Google or Microsoft and we don't want them to be, but the EU is hell set on make them all the same.Yet again, Google and Microsoft need to follow these rules too, yet they are completely fine bringing such features to the EU.
Apple is making issues where there are none.
The thing is very simple, EU is an Union meaning all the countries have same/similar laws and for example you can easily buy smth from other country and have same support as in your local country. So for Apple to be "compatible" with european rulling they would have to support German language on the same level as Estonian or Greek which is hard to do at AI level bc you either need new models with data from that language (impossible) or you need a huge model with no specific language which will work for every language on Earth. And that can be don't maybe by OpenAi but Apple struggles to provide even simple Siri support for English language and very limited closed ecostystem (like the support for all the internal functions of the phone only). For now Apple in EU is seen like (don't want to call it a racist but it is close) brand which says something like: we will support California and New Yourk and Texas but not Nebraska and Montana bc the US government is pushing US to do so, probably you would agree that it sound funny at least.Practical question...if your assertion is accurate, is it really that hard for Apple, with the resources they have, to support other languages? You said other than English and Chinese, okay, those cover huge swaths of humanity, but what about German, French and Spanish? Would it be so impractical for Apple to get those covered?
Apple won't inflict this on the Europeans until it's been thoroughly beta tested by us Yanks. Lucky bastards.🤨
- Apple Intelligence: US 2024 - EU 2025, this one I partially get. They have to provide EU citizens with privacy assurances or face stiff fines for misuse of users' data
👏👏👏 I've never been a fan of bleeding edge. 'tis the second mouse that gets the cheese.😁But I'll rather wait for fully-baked, fully-secured features and services with proper privacy accommodations and data stored locally (both on-device or region-wise) than to have them on day 1.
Well color us suprised that Apple and EU disagree on the reach and security potential for the DMA 😂
Personally I believe that the EU's fines are less about consumer protection and more about generating tax revenue from US tech giants, and potentially hindering their US tech growth to benefit European tech companies.