Remind me again, if people were able to make cell calls and do other things on their phones prior to 2007. If they were, then Stevie invented nothing and I'll admit Timmy invented nothing. Either they both innovated and invented or they didn't.
So then tell me a device like an iPhone which existed prior to 2007 and does everything an iPhone does and has an App Store
Yes. Several flops and on top of that antenna gate and the biggest of all mapgate.
iPhone 4 was when the iPhone really got going and it was the first time Apple had experimented with the metal design. No one had ever designed such a phone before so its obvious some kinks had to be worked out.Now had he copied the competition (by increasing the screen size) and then come up with a gate issue that would be much more embarrassing
Maps was a bad decision and even now Google Maps demolishes it in accuracy and worldwide support but in the grand scheme of things it didn't matter much as Apple is primarily a hardware company. Even now I find iCloud and almost all of Apple's services inferior to their counterparts which is why my iPhone is full of Microsoft and Google apps.Heck Microsoft Wordflow blows the doors of Apple's stock keyboard
So Timmy did invent. Thank you.
Where did I say Timmy invented nothing
Had it not been for the work of many other companies, Apple as a company wouldn't exist.
The behemoth smartphone and tablet industry that we know today wouldn't have existed without Jobs.If Timmy were in charge we would likely be stuck this
Yes I agree, Samsung Pay is almost everywhere, the same that apple pay is almost every everywhere.
Apple Pay is not nearly as supported as Samsung Pay.Easily verified through a Google search
Jobs also hand-picked Timmy for CEO position and since Jobs rarely every made "a bad decision", this was a strategic move as well, acknowledging the person apple needs going forward.
He chose Tim Cook because of his experience running Apple.He does an excellent job at numbers but he does not have a vision to innovate or invent.He did make a slight misstep there
Basically, the airpods is really convenient and easy to use, which in turn makes me naturally use them more compared to other headphones I have owned.
You could say that for any of the AirPods alternatives.There are tons of options for the AirPods on the market.What unique feature does it have apart from W1 which may be rendered obsolete by Bluetooth 5.0
https://www.aboveavalon.com/notes/2016/12/6/milking-the-iphone
Let's see what Apple has accomplished under Tim Cook's leadership.
Does this look like a slump in sales to you?
iPhone sales have consecutively declined for the second quarter in a row. iPad sales continue to drop. Apple's operating margin is at its lowest in 7 years
Higher revenue from services of much higher gross margin products such as games, app downloads and Apple Music haven't been enough to compensate for the erosion of iPhone profitability which is the bottom line.
What are you saying? People have been proclaiming the doom of Apple since time immemorial, even when Steve Jobs were around.
The difference being Steve Jobs actually came up with ways to silence his critics.iPhone,iPad,iPod and Mac.4 solid product lines.All smashing records.Tim Cook has yet to come up with 1.
The most embarrassing part being that Tim's only product line that he can be credited with which is the Apple Watch is projected to earn lesser revenue than the AirPods which is an accessory to the iPhone
Nobody is downplaying Steve Job's contributions here.
I7Guy refuses to acknowledge Steve's contributions and is placing Tim Cook on the same level as Jobs
No man is indispensable. If Tim Cook felt Scott was creating more problems at Apple than he was worth, then he every bit had to go. Remember, he works for Apple, not the other way round.
Often its the people who are the hardest to work with are the ones which are the true assets of the company.Steve Jobs is notorious for being a hard person to work with and yet he was the one who came out with the company's cash cows. We owe the foundation of the current iOS to Forstall. Say what you want about him but from what I read his software releases had far fewer bugs than the iOS we know today
Apple didn't invent the AirPods then?
They did but its just another Bluetooth headphone.The moment Bluetooth 5 headphones come onto the market I don't understand the hype about AirPods.
Saying Apple only improvised on what he invented doesn't make sense. Do you mean they improved?
Yes.They worked out the kinks,made the products nicer and overall better.But the haven't come out with a brand new category which is a smash hit like the iPhone.Steve Jobs brought out iPod in 2001.The iPhone in 2007 and iPad in 2010 and all of these will go down in history as revolutionary.Its been 6 years since Jobs died and we have a Watch for which Apple refuses to disclose sales figures,a battery case,and an improvised iPad which is basically an answer to the Microsoft Surface Pro which they themselves had mocked Microsoft for developing
All the different criticisms of Apple don't add up to a conclusive picture. One argument is Tim Cook cares only about profit - but he allowed a controversial MacBook Pro release and hasn't released a MacBook Air with retina display, which would arguably sell a ton.
He doesn't release or update MacBooks as often as they don't make as much to Apple like the iPad or iPhone.The same amount of enginerring and resources put into the iPad and iPhone will yield much better profits and make financial sense.
Tim Cook prioritises product lines based on profits.The iPad is still stuck on Touch ID 1 from 2014 and still doesn't have 3d touch.The MacBook Air looks like a downright embarassement compared to competing Windows laptops.I have both an XPS 13 and the MBA which Apple currently sells and my MBA feels like a Windows laptop from years ago.The display is still around 900P while my XPS 13 is on 1080P and lasts just as long as the MBA and is also much faster to boot.Apple should just put the Mac line out of its misery .It no longer competes
The only respect in which Apple IS ahead of the competition in some ways is the iPhone.Its a solid well built device and the fastest on the planet and also has the best App Store on the planet
Another criticism is that the current Apple lacks any vision. Yet when Apple execs say, repeatedly "we have a vision for the Mac, and a touch screen is not a part of that vision" the response is "No, you should do what the competition is doing - copy Microsoft."
This is the current status of the Mac AND the only "Buy" you see on this list got the first ever "Don't buy" recommendation from Consumer reports , an independent testing company.Is this part of the vision I keep hearing about.Keep myself plugged to the wall for more time?
We have been hearing about this vision and Tim's product lines for years and when the competition comes out with outstanding computers like the Surface Studio and Razer Blade laptops ,his assurances become harder and harder to believe.I believe this article states a lot about Apple's vision of the Mac as it is inside the company and it makes the Mac look like a mere after thought
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-12-20/how-apple-alienated-mac-loyalists
On a sidenote,you cant even connect the Mac to the iPhone without a dongle and the former still has a headphone jack despite Apple's wireless vision .This is how much Mac iis disconnected from the rest of Apple' lineup
Or better yet, Apple laying out it's vision for headphones: "we believe in a wireless future" - yet people are up in arms saying Apple should have left the headphone jack in so they could have sold more phones. But hold on, I thought Tim Cook chasing sales at the expense of a grand vision for the company was exactly what you didn't want?
Why do people keep bringing up this wireless future excuse. It was perfectly possible to use wireless headphones on a 6S.Now you are forcing me to dump my perfectly usable set of headphones to get the AirPods which weren't even released on time.
The reason he removed the jack was to create another revenue generator I the form of AirPods.The AirPods are expected to generate more revenue than the Apple WatchTim Cook believes the revenue and profits generated from Apple's wireless headphones will more than compensate for the loss in sales due to no jack.And lets be realistic here,this removal is hardly going to dent sales.Apple is a closed garden and its hard to switch to another platform.People will eventually adapt and move on and Apple will make even more short term profits
How about the critics moaning "The iPhone 7 isn't selling nearly as well as well as the iPhone 6" - Wasn't the consensus that the iPhone 6 sold so well because of pent-up demand for an iPhone with a larger screen? Yet wasn't Apple criticised at the time for "copying the competition" and doing something which Steve Jobs would never have done?
Steve Jobs wouldn't have increased the screen size but he would no doubt have come up with another smashing product category to surprise us all.
Do you think something like Apple Music is totally anti-Jobs? I think you need to look back at AllThingsD - there is an interview where Steve says Apple would start a music streaming service if they thought that's what customers wanted and were willing to pay for.
I have nothing against Apple Music but I don't think its ever going to catch up with actual product lines like iPhone in terms of profits.Its just a way to insulate Apple if the other hardware categories start nosediving
Do you think Steve so wanted Apple to be successful after he left that he would create Apple University yet forget to hire "A players" (as he called them) who could invent things on their own?
There is this crazy idea that Steve Jobs' unique role at Apple was what they labeled "CEO" and now he's gone Tim Cook has to be the New Steve Jobs. As was said on DaringFireball's podcast: If you went back to 2008 and told someone who didn't know about Apple what Tim Cook's day to day responsibilities were, and asked them to guess his role, they would have said "he's a CEO". When Steve left, that role was formalised.
[doublepost=1483382078][/doublepost]
Steve Jobs cant transfer his innovative persona to someone else unfortunately so he did the best he could in the circumstances he was in.People like Bill Gates and Steve Jobs are hard to come by . Tim Cook is the Steve Ballmer of Apple.No vision but doing an excellent job at growing the company in the short term but for the long term Apple needs another Jobs to save it and fast
This is my favourite post here! So sick of the Apple haters, it's nice when someone like yourself digs up a buttload of truth to shut them up.
The minor difference being the reports of the iPhone 6s and forward were actually corroborated by declining sales and therefore aren't wrong