because they know they royally ****ed it up and just are too proud to admit it's a probably with the entire line of batteries used
Too little too late. Apple genius denied the iphone 6 (of family member) the 79$ out of warranty battery replacement back in september and suggested a hardware upgrade instead. I hope the lawsuits will hit them hard.
Apple is still slowing down old phone. They didn't learn their lesson.Seems like Apple is getting their stuff together.
Post is not quite 2 hours old here and folks are still whining. You got what you wanted, a battery replacement on request with no diagnostics required. Sheesh.
This thread is a great example of folks feeling entitled.
Apple is still slowing down old phone. They didn't learn their lesson.
In a later post I also pointed out you have to take into account other costs such as building/electricity/water/heating-cooling/management... amongst other costs.
You're right about the ruling in The Netherlands but only if it can't be repaired.
On a related note...
Since our family all upgraded to the iPhone X I do my usual routine of selling our old iPhones. I couldn't sell my daughters due to a malfunctioning Home button (fingerprint reading is wonky). Genius bar wait times were 3-4 days at my local Apple Store, which is common after a new iPhone release and just before Christmas. So I decided to wait. I just tried right now and got an appointment for tomorrow.
So my question is this: If this battery issue is so widespread, then how come the Genius Bars aren't booked fully weeks in advance? Shouldn't there be a wave of millions of customers trying to get their battery replaced? Where are all these people? Hiding?
No one is going to be able to prove the CPU throttling was planned obsolecense. And what is planned obsolecense anyway? Apple doesn’t offer any guarantees on performance. When you buy an iPhone there’s nothing in the fine print that says you will get buttery smooth performance for x number of months/years after device purchase.The french law against practices of planned of obsolescence. Despite the public outrage it is thankfully up to the court to decide if this particular set of performance reductions (cpu, speaker, flash, brightness etc.) is legal. But it is obvious that there was no clear user notification. The vague software license agreement doesn't explicitly describe what Apple has done and they now have to explain to the court their actions in detail. And as a consumer (not a shareholder) i hope they get punished for this, because it let people believe their hardware is at fault when they needed only a simple battery replacement.
The french law against practices of planned of obsolescence. Despite the public outrage it is thankfully up to the court to decide if this particular set of performance reductions (cpu, speaker, flash, brightness etc.) is legal. But it is obvious that there was no clear user notification. The vague software license agreement doesn't explicitly describe what Apple has done and they now have to explain to the court their actions in detail. And as a consumer (not a shareholder) i hope they get punished for this, because it let people believe their hardware is at fault when they needed only a simple battery replacement.
So my question is this: If this battery issue is so widespread, then how come the Genius Bars aren't booked fully weeks in advance? Shouldn't there be a wave of millions of customers trying to get their battery replaced? Where are all these people? Hiding?
Those things are called sunk costs. Apple would be paying for those things regardless if they had 1 customer or 50 getting a battery replacement.
What about outside US, any news on when/if other countries will get the same price? (in my case: Norway)
Exactly. There is no way to prove planned obsolecense unless someone could find an email from Craig Federighi to Phil Schiller admitting that they put in code to slow down old phones to force people to buy new ones. Which of course you’ll never find. The most a lawsuit could maybe uncover is if Apple implemented software changes to cover up for batteries they knew were defective so they didn’t have to replace the battery (or the phone). Good luck proving that.Basically, Apple reserves the right to modify iOS to how it wishes, and that any functionality issues are not covered under the warranty. They need to claim that the issue is software related, not hardware related. The lawsuits will get nowhere because of this. Unless, somehow, they can show that the battery was defective, their warranty and EULA covers against this. Just because YOU want your phone to run how YOU want to, doesn't mean jack squat to how WE want OUR phone to operate.
Gotta law corporate law!
Snip....
If you don’t want to have to worry about your battery expiring, or your phone eventually slowing down a little due to how fast technology is advancing, I hear Nokia has re released their 3315.
sounds like damage control to me