I want to see just how much wattage the new MacBooks can withstand using the 140 W USB-C charger plugged into the USB Type C port with a certified Extended Power Range (EPR) charging cable.
My guess would be providing one more reason to upgrade to the $2499 model, other than the 1TB and 16 core GPU.Still curious as to why Apple did this. I mean personally I’d stick with the slower charger, I’m in no hurry and would prefer the smaller brick. I wonder if any additional battery degradation would occur from the fast charge?
What I’m curious about is the $20 upgrade. It’s hardly big money and what if they misunderstood the market and everyone or no one opts for it? They’d have to produce a lot of one type of charger or the other in a short space of time with global shipping constraints or keep a lot more in the warehouse. There’s minimal profit in it surely? I would have expected it as a $100 upgrade option in classic Apple style or to be only available on the more expensive models.
A $20 on a $2,000 would make anyone not buy it?Or you could look at it the other way. The could have just included the price of the bigger charger in all the 14s and increased the price to accommodate. But now everyone who doesn't need that fast charging speed, and rather is looking to keep the price as low as possible is out of luck. For many the entry price is still to much and those people would probably happily remove some features they won't ever use to get the laptop.
I agree, but I would also rather have it and not need itIt’s pretty rare for me that I would ever need the fast charge capability. It is cool, but would be an unnecessary purchase for me.
It's $20, which probably equates to almost no incremental cost.Or you could look at it the other way. The could have just included the price of the bigger charger in all the 14s and increased the price to accommodate. But now everyone who doesn't need that fast charging speed, and rather is looking to keep the price as low as possible is out of luck. For many the entry price is still to much and those people would probably happily remove some features they won't ever use to get the laptop.
I think you misunderstood the article:
Let me know if I am wrong here.
- standard 67 watt charger with 14-inch MBP: no fast charge
- 96 watt charger with 14-inch MBP: fast charging possible
- 140 watt charger with 14-inch MBP: fast charging possible
I am pretty sure it came with the 16-inch MacBook Pro before the 2019 "redesign."And I have an 87 watt charger, and I can't figure out what it came with. Seems an odd size, and now it's pretty much for the iPad Pro, I guess...
but can you get the $20 charger later or is there something about the computer that wont allow it to work?This is a bit much. You have to upgrade your laptop to get this. Fast charge is a $20 option.
Funny. "Charging sold separately"
Apple's USB-C power adapters are using standard Power Delivery protocols and nothing more. The 96 watt charger for instance is completely unchanged and it's used for the 16 and 14 with Magsafe 3. So they should work just fine with 3rd parties, so long as the power available is sufficient. In addition, they confirmed that the USB ports also allow charging as they did in the last generation.Has anyone seen any confirmation whether third-party PD USB-C chargers will work with the MagSafe 3 cable? I am assuming they will but have not heard a confirmation.
I am glad that Apple retained USB-C/PD charging generally and is supporting fast charging of the 14” model by that port as well as by the MagSafe port.
Will the 140w charger work on airplanes? I seem to remember a 75w limit I also remember the 96w chargers working somehow. Anyone have any experience with this?
Yes, but it will be £79, rather than just the price difference between 67W and 96W chargers.Can i upgrade the charger after I get the machine? lol
He did not mention the TSA. I think he means the capacity of the outlets.TSA doesn't give a F about the wattage on your MacBook charger.
Anyone knows if the charging brick will be smaller on 67W? I'd actually prefer that over fast charging.