I know! Fortunately old doesn‘t mean bad 😉That's what every generation says about their kids' music. When you say it yourself you have gotten old.
I know! Fortunately old doesn‘t mean bad 😉That's what every generation says about their kids' music. When you say it yourself you have gotten old.
We all have different histories. I remember parents hating 70s and 80s music. And their parents not liking 50s and 60s "garbage" that my parents liked.Except I recall parents and kids generally liking & listening to much of the late 70’s, 80’s and early 90’s music together. After all the angst/anger-ridden grunge and gangsta rap that rose in the early/mid 90’s, then things started to really separate.
Let’s see if the music in this commercial is ever heard in stores or on elevators or in waiting rooms after 5-10 years from now...Not that a song becoming Muzak defines a “good“ song...but more, a song staying memorable enough to be heard for decades really says something about its a quality IMHO.
Actually it is music, it’s artistic expression. It’s fine if you don’t like this genre but music doesn’t just exist in one form. If rock, dance, rap, metal et-al didn’t exist then the world would be very boring.this is not music, had to turn it off
Never too old. “Cool” is a construct.Seems I'm officially too old to be cool anymore
Nonsense it’s extremely creative. Could you do better?Well that certainly doesn't live up to the excellent holiday ads of years past. Looks like the creatives took the year off. #2020
You mean the music isn’t to your taste. There I fixed that for you.Beautifully produced, but nonsensical and the music isn't great.
No I don’t think it’s that at all. There’s a common dismissive theme in the forum suggesting it’s not music because it’s different. This is not fine.So we should now like things that we don't like, otherwise we are bigots?
There may be a polite reasons to withhold judgements of appearance in a face-to-face context. To express those opinions on a minor forum when a rich artist is being remunerated is a completely different context.
Your suggestion that we should not be able to form or express our own aesthetic preferences is full-on authoritarian and anti-liberal.
Tupac didn’t pioneer this genre he was a participant, the genre pre-dates him by over a decade.Seeing the comments in this thread gives me hope that the large majority of people here (and by extension elsewhere) are waking up to the nonsense these companies are pushing in order to pander to certain groups and push nonsensical content or “art” in order to ultimately sell products while claiming “virtue”
It’s a terrible ad to most who see it and I think even Tupac Shakur is spinning in his grave to what the genre he pioneered has become and to whom it has been taken over by.
I’m sure that was the case. But let’s see if we hear the song in the Apple ad anywhere in 10 years. See you in 2030.We all have different histories. I remember parents hating 70s and 80s music. And their parents not liking 50s and 60s "garbage" that my parents liked.
Sure... I'd just re-use 2019's holiday ad, or 2018's holiday, etc, etc. The point I'm making, is this year's ad is inferior to past ones. Sure art is subjective, but I think you'll find a difficult battle convincing anyone that this year's ad is as good or better than year's past. But keep up the good fight!Nonsense it’s extremely creative. Could you do better?
The casual racism with post likes these is gross. If you couldn't understand the lyrics, you may just not understand the English language. Also, this isn't a holiday song ... it's a holiday themed commercial, but the song is not a holiday song.I remember the days when you could actually understand the lyrics of a song and holiday songs sounded like holidays. *sigh* those were the times...
So you’d reuse last years ad to be more creative?!? Think about that for a minute.Sure... I'd just re-use 2019's holiday ad, or 2018's holiday, etc, etc. The point I'm making, is this year's ad is inferior to past ones. Sure art is subjective, but I think you'll find a difficult battle convincing anyone that this year's ad is as good or better than year's past. But keep up the good fight!
I’m not sticking up for the terrible advert, but I don’t get people’s problem with the tooth decorations. OK, you don’t like them, but it’s obvious they’re decorative and therefore represent personal taste; surely you don’t expect everyone to have the same taste as you, so what’s with the shock? You’re basically saying “I’m appalled by this demonstration of taste which differs from my own”.I guess I’m not the target demo of that production because I thought it was dreadful. And what, in the name of all that is holy, was going on with that woman's teeth?
"Casual racism" vs. "Premeditated Racism"?The casual racism with post likes these is gross.
The artist is entitled to decorate herself however she sees fit. She is not entitled to universal approval of her decorative choices.I’m not sticking up for the terrible advert, but I don’t get people’s problem with the tooth decorations. OK, you don’t like them, but it’s obvious they’re decorative and therefore represent personal taste; surely you don’t expect everyone to have the same taste as you, so what’s with the shock? You’re basically saying “I’m appalled by this demonstration of taste which differs from my own”.
See Post #152Can anyone tell me what its message is?
Adverts usually have a really simple and obvious message.
For example:
“Our deodorant will make you attractive”
“This phone makes life more fun”
“You can do real work on this iPad”
“Giving this product as a gift indicates real love”
”Macs are for fun people; Windows is for boring nerds”
Obviously they’re usually complete bollocks, but they’re clear. I don’t know what this one’s is.
"I am offended by your opinion, I want to speak to the safe space manager".
It’s a terrible ad to most who see it and I think even Tupac Shakur is spinning in his grave to what the genre he pioneered has become and to whom it has been taken over by.