Its still going to happen, I really don't care really care what you believe. You could be one of those we didn't walk on the moon guys, I mean the other day Eric Schmidt said Android is more secure then iOS he's a senior exec for Google, you think that is a more accurate announcement then Jim saying we will have the ipad event on the 22nd, its from an official guy at Google, must be true right? There are lots of reason for Apple to be using Jim vs an Official announcement from Apple. There are a half dozen of you that everytime Jim posts one of these, thinks Jim might not be right. The only reason Apple can use Jim as an unofficial spokesman is that he is 100% correct, if just once he is not, he becomes useless to Apple in that function.
-Tig
It happening or not happening is not the issue. A lot of rumours turn out to be true and a lot of official statements are utter lies. I am not talking about who is telling the truth and who is not.
I am talking about official confirmed statements vs rumours. And if Apple are using an unofficial mouthpiece to do the talking, the only reason would be to prevent egg on Apple's face if anything said didn't go to plan. Apple would just say "Apple didn't confirm anything." And Apple would be correct in this. As the unofficial mouthpiece can't confirm anything. They are just a very plausible way to generate hype to get the public hyped up and ready to receive the upcoming Apple announcement, whatever that may be.
Your sarcasm is well noted here in what you said. I do not believe that every official statement speaks 100% truth. But it is what that company believes. And that is my point. If someone else says it, then it is what that person (be it an analyst, or this Jim guy or you or I or anyone) believes. The belief could be based on evidence or it could not be. Does not matter.
I have my reasons to want to wait for what the company (Apple + others) believe in their official statements. No people outside the respective companies can officially know or state this.
I realise you don't care what I believe. You stated it in your post here. But for the benefit of you and everyone else reading this I am explaining my point of view on this as you seemed to misunderstand me.
"The only reason Apple can use Jim as an unofficial spokesman is that he is 100% correct, if just once he is not, he becomes useless to Apple in that function."
If he was an unofficial spokesman as you say, then he'd never be wrong as he'd be fed information from Apple. "Just once he is not" would never happen. So if he is an unofficial spokesman what you say does not apply at all.
Mr Jim can be 100% correct. Be it through inside information (from Apple) or other sources, this does not change things. I will acknowledge this and say well done Mr Jim, but I will still wait for Apple's official statement.
"There are a half dozen of you that everytime Jim posts one of these, thinks Jim might not be right." You said this. I am not one of these people. I don't care if he is right or wrong. I take his words for what they are and wait for the Apple statement on the issue. There is nothing like an official statement to put something beyond any shadow of a doubt.