Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Yes and the article clearly states that is because of PRICE and not because of Touch ID/face is or familiarity like you claimed.

Here is the article:


Again this is the article you keep referencing.

Have you even read the article once?
Your still trying to just argue..... Again 75% of the iphone sold did not have FID...fact! That AND price has a lot to do with that. BUT the buying consumers spoke with their wallets........ They purchased older phones ahead of the newest phone. The iphone x only accounted for 17% of iphones sales. The iphone 8 Plus sold better than the X did.

Allot of this has to do with people are slow to adopt new technology and want to hold onto phones with TID more than it has to do with price points imho
[doublepost=1532627288][/doublepost]
You missed the point that the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus were also for sale during this period and quite well still.

HO HO HO!

Doesn't say much for Face ID's popularity. Apparently way more than 55% of people still wanted the Home button after all. All in all, I'd say the huge winner was Touch ID.

Pretty much what I predicted and was laughed at for saying. The Home Button and Touch ID are sound solid tech.

All these new gestures and mistaken touches to me lead to a "bag o' hurt." Too many things to remember. Apple is about simplifying things. Taking the home button away unnecessarily complicates a lot of things in my opinion.

But what do I know? The buyers have spoken. :D

Tim Cook, the bean counter, should have noticed this. What will happen when there is no Home Button iPhone left in the mix? Hmm.
I agree...i think more people like TouchID than they thought would. The iphone X only account for 17% of iphones sales in the article.
 
That wasn’t so hard.
Another example of you just wanting to argue and go off topic. I already said this 40 posts ago on post#132

I think you misunderstood my post. I don't think Apple is in trouble at all. I think the numbers speak for themselves. People are not ready to adopt the new model iphone and prefer the legacy models more. Some of this is price point and some is people and afraid of change and something new. Some prefer TID and not FID....some like the form factor of the older phones.
 
Another example of you just wanting to argue and go off topic. I already said this 40 posts ago on post#132

Its actually only price point.
The rest is opinion you brandishing as fact.

As the article clearly stares.

But you know that.
 
Its actually only price point.
The rest is opinion you brandishing as fact.

As the article clearly stares.

But you know that.
do you have a source for that or is that you stating your opinion as fact?
Because the article displays the numbers and then the authors opinion....like you did.....
 
Whatever the reason is, there seems to be a steady demand for SE, which I have been using for the past year. I really hope to see an updated version of it in near future.
The SE is a good phone, and there are reasons to keep it around. But those who like it for its smaller size are fooling themselves if they think there’s much demand for small iPhones, especially if they’re priced any higher than they are now.

The SE sells for as little as $99 in the US when locked to prepaid carriers, though I’d guess the majority of sales are probably at $349. In any case, a good portion of that 8% market share are due to price.

If Apple can sell a 4.7” iPhone for SE prices and still make their margin, I think the SE is history. The vast majority of people simply want larger phones, particularly in countries where the phone is the only computer the customer owns.
 
All these new gestures and mistaken touches to me lead to a "bag o' hurt." Too many things to remember. Apple is about simplifying things. Taking the home button away unnecessarily complicates a lot of things in my opinion.
.

This is so true. I have been using computers and the internet daily for the past 20+ years and even I have difficulty figuring things around Apple's latest hardware and software. I remember when iMovie first came out, even if you didn't know film editing you could figure it out yourself. It was that simple.

Now you have to jump through hoops
 
You missed the point that the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus were also for sale during this period and quite well still.

HO HO HO!

Doesn't say much for Face ID's popularity. Apparently way more than 55% of people still wanted the Home button after all. All in all, I'd say the huge winner was Touch ID.

Pretty much what I predicted and was laughed at for saying. The Home Button and Touch ID are sound solid tech.

All these new gestures and mistaken touches to me lead to a "bag o' hurt." Too many things to remember. Apple is about simplifying things. Taking the home button away unnecessarily complicates a lot of things in my opinion.

But what do I know? The buyers have spoken. :D

Tim Cook, the bean counter, should have noticed this. What will happen when there is no Home Button iPhone left in the mix? Hmm.
Lol, this chart does nothing but prove there are different cost brackets that people fall into.
 
Not sure why it matters to people if Touch ID or Face ID sold more/less or for whatever reasons. Apple has been pretty clear that Face ID is the future of their platform when it comes to bio-metric security. The options are to adapt or move on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WannaGoMac
It can’t cost more than the entry level iPad that’s the problem. Which means it has to be priced under $300 and Apple aren’t interested in that market.

Any refresh would mean cutting back on current features. They’d remove the laminated screen and probably use one of the thicker designs to keep costs down.
The mini 4 already costs more than the entry level iPad. No reason it can’t continue at the $399 price point.

The easiest and cheapest refresh would be just a CPU/memory bump. Going from A8/2GB to A11/3GB. That would buy them another 3 years if shelf life. But camera upgrades would be likely, what else I’m not sure. I really don’t think it’ll be a small bezel/FaceID mini Pro type of update but I’d love to be surprised!
 
Last edited:
The mini 4 already costs more than the entry level iPad. No reason it can’t continue at the $399 price point.

The easiest and cheapest refresh would be just a CPU/memory bump. Going from A8/2GB to A11/3GB. That would buy them another 3 years if shelf life.
It does and people are already saying it’s over priced.
 
My thinking: buy the expensive new phone that’s untested or buy the third gen product that’s relatively cheaper (still expensive).

I like my iPhone 8, but my 6s was much better...because it had a headphone jack.

Also Apple’s secret weapon isn’t an amazing camera or oled screen. It’s imessage.
 
It does and people are already saying it’s over priced.
People always say Apple products are overpriced, nothing new.

The mini 4—a 2015 model with a 2014 CPU—had an 18% market share at the current price of $399. A refreshed model with up-to-date internals should be able to do at least that well.

No reason to expect a price cut.
 
My thinking: buy the expensive new phone that’s untested or buy the third gen product that’s relatively cheaper (still expensive).

I like my iPhone 8, but my 6s was much better...because it had a headphone jack.

Also Apple’s secret weapon isn’t an amazing camera or oled screen. It’s imessage.
I know two people that said they choose the 8 plus because it was better than the X. They said the X was untested and the technology wasn’t finished. They said the X was like a prototype.
 
do you have a source for that or is that you stating your opinion as fact?
Because the article displays the numbers and then the authors opinion....like you did.....

You don’t seem to grasp the difference between cumulative vs quarterly sales.


Already posted my sources.

I did, did you?

Now do you have any sources to back up your assertions?

Still waiting.

Here some facts.

Q4 2017:
"Stellar" sales for iPhone X in China, best selling phone in the UK”
https://www.phonearena.com/news/iPhone-X-Sales-Q4-2017-results_id101524

Apple iPhone X sales are "stellar" in China and Japan, and it is the best selling phone in the United Kingdom in November, according to research firm Kantar Worldpanel.
The big highlight of this story, however, really is China, the world's biggest phone market, where the iPhone X is performing incredibly well. While switchers to the iPhone X in other markets come from upgraders from earlier iPhones, in China the overwhelming majority of iPhone X buyers come from Android users.


Q1 2018:
“iPhone X beats Galaxy S9 and iPhone 8 to become the best selling phone in Q1”
https://www.indiatoday.in/technolog...e-best-selling-phone-in-q1-1227179-2018-05-05

According to a report by a data analytics firm Strategy Analytics, global smartphone shipment reached 345 million units in the first quarter of 2018 and despite the fear of alienating a lot of users due to its high pricing, Apple's iPhone X became the highest selling smartphone shipping 16 million units across the globe during the quarter.


This quarter:
“Kantar: iPhone makes up 8 out of the 10 best-selling smartphones in Q2 as iOS gains on Android”
https://9to5mac.com/2018/07/24/kantar-iphone-q2-sales/

According to Kantar, iPhone X made up 5.3 percent of all handsets sold in China. This means iPhone X has now been the best-selling smartphone in China every month since its release in November.

So... care to provide some sources for your assertion?
 
Love these surveys that people take as gospel. Fact is no one know how the X is doing except Apple. last time folks reported survey say X isnt selling, Cook replied the X was the larges selling iPhone every week.

Who cares anyway which model sells more or not? Buy the device you like and move on, no need to reinforce your decision knowing the largest herd is in your area.
 
  • Like
Reactions: decafjava
By the same token, the 6s series is hanging tough as well ... might it be because of the 3.5mm analog headphone port?
Nope, the 6s is there because it's the only 4.7" iphone with a physical home button. That's way more important to iphone buyers than a silly little headphone jack that no one uses.

Nah, just kidding. Honestly, I really don't know why anyone would want to buy a 6s today. The SE is a much better phone, except for folks wanting the 4.7" screen.
 
You don’t seem to grasp the difference between cumulative vs quarterly sales.

again....its reading comprehension. Try to actualy READ the article in the thread that you are posting in...
Apple's iPhone 8 Plus Was the Top Selling iPhone in the U.S. During Q2 2018
 
Did anyone notice the *increase* of numbers of iPad Mini 4? This should tell Apple something, don't you think? I just love the form factor. Can't see myself holding any other iPad on my hand while reading on the subway.
 
iPad Mini update is way overdue! Apple wants to increase iPad sales, just add a new A12 and 3 GB of LPDDR4. You do not have even re-design the Mini 3/4 chassis either. Cost Apple nothing to do this since all the component parts are from the September iPhone! Instead of sell it for $400; do it as $600 as the base and top of the line $999.99!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.