So true. For Apple, affordable starts at $700...If they want to offer an affordable option, $499 would sound good.
So true. For Apple, affordable starts at $700...If they want to offer an affordable option, $499 would sound good.
Your still trying to just argue..... Again 75% of the iphone sold did not have FID...fact! That AND price has a lot to do with that. BUT the buying consumers spoke with their wallets........ They purchased older phones ahead of the newest phone. The iphone x only accounted for 17% of iphones sales. The iphone 8 Plus sold better than the X did.Yes and the article clearly states that is because of PRICE and not because of Touch ID/face is or familiarity like you claimed.
Here is the article:
Again this is the article you keep referencing.
Have you even read the article once?
I agree...i think more people like TouchID than they thought would. The iphone X only account for 17% of iphones sales in the article.You missed the point that the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus were also for sale during this period and quite well still.
HO HO HO!
Doesn't say much for Face ID's popularity. Apparently way more than 55% of people still wanted the Home button after all. All in all, I'd say the huge winner was Touch ID.
Pretty much what I predicted and was laughed at for saying. The Home Button and Touch ID are sound solid tech.
All these new gestures and mistaken touches to me lead to a "bag o' hurt." Too many things to remember. Apple is about simplifying things. Taking the home button away unnecessarily complicates a lot of things in my opinion.
But what do I know? The buyers have spoken.
Tim Cook, the bean counter, should have noticed this. What will happen when there is no Home Button iPhone left in the mix? Hmm.
Another example of you just wanting to argue and go off topic. I already said this 40 posts ago on post#132That wasn’t so hard.
I think you misunderstood my post. I don't think Apple is in trouble at all. I think the numbers speak for themselves. People are not ready to adopt the new model iphone and prefer the legacy models more. Some of this is price point and some is people and afraid of change and something new. Some prefer TID and not FID....some like the form factor of the older phones.
Another example of you just wanting to argue and go off topic. I already said this 40 posts ago on post#132
do you have a source for that or is that you stating your opinion as fact?Its actually only price point.
The rest is opinion you brandishing as fact.
As the article clearly stares.
But you know that.
The SE is a good phone, and there are reasons to keep it around. But those who like it for its smaller size are fooling themselves if they think there’s much demand for small iPhones, especially if they’re priced any higher than they are now.Whatever the reason is, there seems to be a steady demand for SE, which I have been using for the past year. I really hope to see an updated version of it in near future.
All these new gestures and mistaken touches to me lead to a "bag o' hurt." Too many things to remember. Apple is about simplifying things. Taking the home button away unnecessarily complicates a lot of things in my opinion.
.
Lol, this chart does nothing but prove there are different cost brackets that people fall into.You missed the point that the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus were also for sale during this period and quite well still.
HO HO HO!
Doesn't say much for Face ID's popularity. Apparently way more than 55% of people still wanted the Home button after all. All in all, I'd say the huge winner was Touch ID.
Pretty much what I predicted and was laughed at for saying. The Home Button and Touch ID are sound solid tech.
All these new gestures and mistaken touches to me lead to a "bag o' hurt." Too many things to remember. Apple is about simplifying things. Taking the home button away unnecessarily complicates a lot of things in my opinion.
But what do I know? The buyers have spoken.
Tim Cook, the bean counter, should have noticed this. What will happen when there is no Home Button iPhone left in the mix? Hmm.
The mini 4 already costs more than the entry level iPad. No reason it can’t continue at the $399 price point.It can’t cost more than the entry level iPad that’s the problem. Which means it has to be priced under $300 and Apple aren’t interested in that market.
Any refresh would mean cutting back on current features. They’d remove the laminated screen and probably use one of the thicker designs to keep costs down.
It does and people are already saying it’s over priced.The mini 4 already costs more than the entry level iPad. No reason it can’t continue at the $399 price point.
The easiest and cheapest refresh would be just a CPU/memory bump. Going from A8/2GB to A11/3GB. That would buy them another 3 years if shelf life.
People always say Apple products are overpriced, nothing new.It does and people are already saying it’s over priced.
I know two people that said they choose the 8 plus because it was better than the X. They said the X was untested and the technology wasn’t finished. They said the X was like a prototype.My thinking: buy the expensive new phone that’s untested or buy the third gen product that’s relatively cheaper (still expensive).
I like my iPhone 8, but my 6s was much better...because it had a headphone jack.
Also Apple’s secret weapon isn’t an amazing camera or oled screen. It’s imessage.
do you have a source for that or is that you stating your opinion as fact?
Because the article displays the numbers and then the authors opinion....like you did.....
I did, did you?
Now do you have any sources to back up your assertions?
Still waiting.
Here some facts.
Q4 2017:
"Stellar" sales for iPhone X in China, best selling phone in the UK”
https://www.phonearena.com/news/iPhone-X-Sales-Q4-2017-results_id101524
Apple iPhone X sales are "stellar" in China and Japan, and it is the best selling phone in the United Kingdom in November, according to research firm Kantar Worldpanel.
The big highlight of this story, however, really is China, the world's biggest phone market, where the iPhone X is performing incredibly well. While switchers to the iPhone X in other markets come from upgraders from earlier iPhones, in China the overwhelming majority of iPhone X buyers come from Android users.
Q1 2018:
“iPhone X beats Galaxy S9 and iPhone 8 to become the best selling phone in Q1”
https://www.indiatoday.in/technolog...e-best-selling-phone-in-q1-1227179-2018-05-05
According to a report by a data analytics firm Strategy Analytics, global smartphone shipment reached 345 million units in the first quarter of 2018 and despite the fear of alienating a lot of users due to its high pricing, Apple's iPhone X became the highest selling smartphone shipping 16 million units across the globe during the quarter.
This quarter:
“Kantar: iPhone makes up 8 out of the 10 best-selling smartphones in Q2 as iOS gains on Android”
https://9to5mac.com/2018/07/24/kantar-iphone-q2-sales/
According to Kantar, iPhone X made up 5.3 percent of all handsets sold in China. This means iPhone X has now been the best-selling smartphone in China every month since its release in November.
So... care to provide some sources for your assertion?
So CIRP surveyed 500 customers for a couple of months and came up with an “opinion”? I trust Apple ceo more than this company when discussing sales of Apple products.You don’t seem to grasp the difference between cumulative vs quarterly sales.
Already posted my sources.
But what do I know? The buyers have spoken.
Tim Cook, the bean counter, should have noticed this. What will happen when there is no Home Button iPhone left in the mix? Hmm.
Nope, the 6s is there because it's the only 4.7" iphone with a physical home button. That's way more important to iphone buyers than a silly little headphone jack that no one uses.By the same token, the 6s series is hanging tough as well ... might it be because of the 3.5mm analog headphone port?
You don’t seem to grasp the difference between cumulative vs quarterly sales.
If it wasn't selling it would be discontinued (just like the MacBook Air and the Mac Mini)