No they don't. Mac sales are down, and most people use Windows 10 anyway even though it's garbage.The facts kind of ruin that argument.
Clearly Tim Cook should immediately cut off 32 bit program access to all Apple iPhones and Macs.
It's a feature that will and has sparked sales. Look at the iPhone XR. And we know, nobody ever wanted to downgrade to IOS 10.
I predict that Tim Cook will ultimately undo all the advantages of the iPhone & Mac that Steve Jobs worked so hard to create. He's a bean counter by nature and that is what they do. He is after all a "Fuqua" Businesses Scholar.
And finally, "economic uncertainty in countries, including the U.S." ??? Are you kidding me? America had the best economy last year in 60 YEARS! And that's simply economic data, not opinion. If people aren't buying, it's because you must be making crappy products or not ones they want.
Yep,making the next macos supported only by maca with t1 and t2 chip will resolve thisThey will solve this by not supporting older machines with the next OSX , give them time and they will force update soon and sales will rise again![]()
I'd like to replace my 10 y.o. MBP but not at these prices. NO!
I guess you don’t understand how insane a $25B MAC business is despite a move to iPad and mobile computing. Look at the iPhone and iPad charts...you are missing the bigger story.
People are buying mobile devices A LOT more than Macs (so Apple still wins) AND YET the MAC is still half the size of the entire Disney company.
I’m not very well practised in Numbers, but I threw this together at the time the last MBPs were released. The prices don’t seem too far different from years past, especially if adjusted for inflation.
so people should be gratful a bad thing is doing well?I guess you don’t understand how insane a $25B MAC business is despite a move to iPad and mobile computing. Look at the iPhone and iPad charts...you are missing the bigger story.
People are buying mobile devices A LOT more than Macs (so Apple still wins) AND YET the MAC is still half the size of the entire Disney company.
Prices are supposed to come down, even adjusted for inflation, year on year, definitely over longer periods like a decade or two.
i just love "serious cat"!We’re in a downward time right now. Radical or advancement in technological updates are slow. This years poducts look a lot like lasts years product. It might be like this for another year.
Because without a visionary like Jobs you cannot tell people what they want / need but you have to listen what people want / need.Remains the question, why is Lenovo successful and Apple not ?
Lenovo didn't drop so why give Apple a pass?Of course sales drops. Apple must start prioritising its desktop line again and provide more frequent updates to iMacs and iMac Pros. I've been waiting for buying a new one, the past year. Still waiting.. That simple.
Your experience fully supports IBM's statement Mac's are cheaper then PC's by $543 dollars a year. In your case a total savings of $5,430. The Total Cost of Ownership or Return On Investment what really counts. In your case, awesome ROI.
Looks like solid sales. The industry declined in general at a larger rate than Macs.
Plus IBM bought Red Hat Linux for $32 billion last year so we know where their "Unix" is going forward (hint: it's not the Mac)Those $543 savings on TCO that IBM published in 2016 were not per year, but over a four year lifespan. Also, it was not $543 per Mac, but between $273 and $543 depending on the model.
That is still quite a bit of money on average, but one should also keep in mind that:
a) they were comparing fairly different types of hardware (e.g. the biggest saving was MBP13 vs Lenovo X1 Yoga - the latter being a 2-in-1, not exactly the same use case),
b) they were extrapolating the Macs' maintenance costs based on one year of deployment and comparing this to the known maintenance costs of old Windows machines,
c) the projected savings included the estimated resale value after four years, and that was with 2015-Macs; will the current glued-up and soldered Macs keep a similar resale value, especially once the keyboard replacement program is over?
d) they included various additional software licensing costs that they had to pay for on the Windows machines only because they refused to use the built-in solutions. There may be good reasons for this, for IBM, but it seems a bit dubious to include that in a general Mac savings estimate - few people have the specific corporate software requirements of IBM.
Overall I find these estimates too vague, with too much potential for fudged numbers, to use them as a guidance for my own purchasing decisions.
Remains the question, why is Lenovo successful and Apple not ?
I know several people who refuse to buy any Apple laptop that has the crappy NuKeyboard / dust condom. Instead, they stick with their 5+ yo MacBook Pros.
The desktop side is also annoying. Being able to easily access and upgrade RAM is a basic design requirement. Periodic component refreshes are another basic requirement Apple consistently fails at.
Sculley 2.0 and Captain Thin aren't the dynamic duo we need to lead the Mac (or Apple) to greatness.
I'd like to replace my 10 y.o. MBP but not at these prices. NO!