Totally disagree, it sounds like that person needs a flip phone, why pay for a smartphone and & 30.00 a month and not take photos, use some apps, take some videos, download some songs because if you do that your almost maxed out of your 16 gb which in reality is not even 16 it's much less when you power up for the first time.
I had a 16 GB for 4 years, and took photos on vacation and special occasions, with a couple videos. It was my main email, calendar, contact and notes device. Regularly communicated with facebook, skype, whatsapp, etc. Good for youtube, online banking, listening to podcasts, streaming radio stations, light web browsing, with tonnes of map and dictionary use, having over 50 apps installed.
Basically, I couldn't imaging going back to a non-smartphone, after just a couple months of use. And really all I had to do to make 16 GB work was not store TV shows or full movies on it, and make music synch'ing choose only a couple days at a time.
I traveled around the world, and managed work, play, and many life necessities from my pocket, with whatever WiFi I could find or pay-as-you-go cellular plan I could get for a week or month at a time, all in under 16 GB.
I know others still on 16 GB iPhones, and yes it takes work, but no, a non-smartphone would not cut it at all for them either.
So when a company designs a product, does some research that shows a certain feature/size is just right for the market at that time and says so, then that company must, in perpetuity, stay with that feature or size? If they don't then they are in your opinion failing in some manner? So when market research shows them that the original feature/size is no longer what fits the market, they are not allowed to change because why, they once said the feature/size was just right? What are you a Republican or something, who runs around screaming "flip flopper" any time an opponent changes their mind? The world is a wiggly place and change is welcome.
Exactly. I found, with my old 3.5" iPhone 4, that really everything was great, except desktop-sized web sites oriented to selling tickets or complex form entry. Most anything else was fine. Until 4" phones became the norm, and apps were changed to make use of the additional space, and added more toolbars, leaving less content area for me on 3.5". Luckily, iOS 7 actually helped with that, as it gave back some noticeable content area, with toolbars and scrollbars getting smaller or disappearing when not in use. Eventually I got the iPhone 6, after making sure it could actually fit in my pockets and hand. It's so much better having a larger screen.
But, it feels much less secure in my hand than others' 4" iPhones. I definitely prefer the feel of the smaller screen, but in the end held out to buy a larger one to see more content.
So, I think all their holding usability studies for 4" were right, it's just that usability turned out to be a lesser factor overall.