Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
This reeks of the posters Apple used to have to help you make a computer buying choice right before Jobs came back. They need to go back to basics. All iPads should be the same equipment with the only difference being size. Done.

I remember when Apple used to sell the 13" MacBook plastic, 13" MacBook aluminum, MacBook Air, 15" MacBook Pro, and 17" MacBook Pro. Somehow customers survived that era.

Same way they later survived the 13" polycarbonate unibody MacBook, the 11" and 13" MacBook Air, and the 13"/15"/17" MacBook Pros on sale all at once.
 
I believe the non-laminated display is due to lower repair costs for the education sector?
 
  • Wow
Reactions: sorgo †
The 9 is still needed as it will be the big focus for education institutes. The new 10 is a great new upgraded unit for normal people. The Air is a bit odd in the new lineup. The Pro makes obvious sense.
 
  • Disagree
  • Like
Reactions: gim and sorgo †
Lol ok. Maybe go back and clarify your post and say “Only a company as large as Apple.” Because saying a “large company” and a “tiny company” is ludicrous in your rationale.

The company I work for has 70,000 employees so I’d say it qualifies as large.

Very well. Revenue is the measure I use.

But if we want to use employee counts, Apple is trying to support more than TWICE as many employees at about 15X,000. Perhaps they need a few more choices in the mix to carry more than TWICE the number of employees?

Yes, I agree: a 70K employee company can certainly meet someone's definition of large. If that's yours, then Apple is Extra-Large.

FWIW: I don't hate the idea of simplified product mixes. I simply believe that while that worked when Apple was relatively tiny, it wouldn't work when Apple is the biggest company in the world. If anything, we should be impressed they can be the biggest with such a smallish number of products in the mix.
 
Last edited:
What is the difference between a laminated and non-laminated displays?
Non-laminated displays have an air gap between the display itself and the device’s front glass, whereas laminated displays do not. This makes laminated displays more accurate for note-taking, drawing, and generally just more pleasing to the eye.
 
Fixed it for you Apple:
which is right.png
 
None of which are worth upgrading to if you bought an iPad in the last 3 years.
Or even earlier - my 1st-gen 12,9" iPad Pro (purchased right after release, late 2015) is still perfectly usable. It just needs to be set up as new after a complete OS restore after major iOS releases to avoid slowdown.

EDIT: Particularly now that I have the 16" 2021, I just don't use / need the iPad for bedtime Web browsing / time killing either.
 
If you thought that iPad Pro 11-inch vs. iPad Air vs. iPad was confusing enough, let me remind you that refurbished iPad Air (4th generation), iPad Pro (A12X, A12Z) are also contenders in that space 🤣
 
I have to say I’m kind of with you here. I love Apple, but when they consistently do weak releases like this it makes this product line difficult to care about anymore.

They are way too concerned with cannabalizing their laptop sales to give us a true replacement device. And honestly, that is fine, but they need to stop with the “The iPad is a replacement for your computer nonsense.” It isn’t and anyone doing more than then email and web browsing will know that 5 minutes into using one.

I guess I’ve just lost interest in this product line because there is ZERO innovation going on here. Even iPadOS 16 is a complete waste. Oh well, maybe next year 😂
What the hell do you expect, a toaster in it? There is only so much new tech to put into the iPad at this point. Most of it will continue to be software based improvements like other technologies. Nobody expects to need to buy a new iPad more than once every 3-5 years.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.