People really can't see the difference between the pic at the top of this discussion and this:
Really?
BINGO.... It's perfect now!
People really can't see the difference between the pic at the top of this discussion and this:
Really?
That attitude is the one which could have prevented for Apple to emerge in the first place as a company, fortunately it didn't.
Please explain to me how spending $6M on a new structure that is marginally different from the previous is somehow going to make Apple a better company?
A waste of money, if you ask me.
MacRumors reader Vincent sent along these photos of the new cube, which utilizes only 15 panes of glass rather than the 90 used in the original cube.
Please explain to me how spending $6M on a new structure that is marginally different from the previous is somehow going to make Apple a better company?
A waste of money, if you ask me.
Please explain to me how spending $6M on a new structure that is marginally different from the previous is somehow going to make Apple a better company?
A waste of money, if you ask me.
Except with far fewer pieces and less of a Rubik's Cube effect. It never was expected to be a vast change. The little things matter. The next update will likely not happen, however, until Kirk and the crew come back in time and Scotty teaches someone to manufacture transparent aluminum. Glass can only handle so much.![]()
I completely agree with Ron Johnson, the old design was way better. The new one is just too boring. Sometimes, Steve got it all wrong.
My feeling exactly when I looked at the new design. It's so transparent that it loses it's stature. Personal opinion, but the old design was better.I completely agree with Ron Johnson, the old design was way better. The new one is just too boring. Sometimes, Steve got it all wrong.
In "Steve Jobs", the biography, there is this paragraph:
- Ron Johnson was not thrilled by the idea (Of changing the store). He thought the eighteen panes actually looked better than four panes would. "The proportions we have today work magically with the colonnade of the GM building", he said. "It glitters like a jewel box. I think if we get the glass too transparent, it will almost go away to a fault". He debated the point with Jobs, but to no avail. "When technology enables something new, he wants to take advantage of that", said Johnson. "Plus, for Steve, less is always more, simpler is always better. Therefore, if you can build a glass box with fewer elements, it's better, it's simpler and it's at the forefront of technology. That's where Steve likes to be, in both his products and his stores."
People really can't see the difference between the pic at the top of this discussion and this:
Really?