Yep. If I were in the market for a 5K display, instant disqualifying factor. I'd rather have the iMac’s giant—but even—bezels any day.How is this better than the previous version?
Also, why is the top bezel thicker than the bottom? Bloody hell
Yep. If I were in the market for a 5K display, instant disqualifying factor. I'd rather have the iMac’s giant—but even—bezels any day.How is this better than the previous version?
Also, why is the top bezel thicker than the bottom? Bloody hell
You won't get much (work) done starring at just a stand.![]()
Many people will buy the 6K monitor as remember it's a reference monitor, so the ones people buy currently for that cost around 40K, and are not as powerful. They are not aimed towards regular consumers. But yes, there is clearly a market for Apple to make a monitor aimed at consumers. Most of us assumed it was coming later this year or early next year along side the new 16in MacBook Pro, but with today's announcement that means perhaps that monitor from Apple is not as imminent. For people in need of a monitor tough to know whether to settle for this one, or way an unknown amount of time for Apple's eventual one.Is Apple incapable of making a nice looking, decent quality display for $1500-$2000? I don’t get it. Almost no one is going to buy those $6,000 displays (with stand), it’s simply a non-starter for the vast majority of people, including non-institutional Mac Pro buyers.
Come on Apple, just release a 5k display with a stand and nano tech. You have the tech on the iMac, just make it stand alone. How difficult that can be.
Yes, I know you are afraid will canabalize Apple XDR display sales.
Well I might as well just stare that ridiculously priced strand than this ugly ducking
You aren't colour grading a movie on such a cheep display.So for those of us not color grading the next Star Wars film, we gotta buy this??? And where’s the HDR?
You aren't colour grading a movie on such a cheep display.
Have to agree here, $999 for a stand is beyond stupidity, I hope they tank hard.
Other than this and the 94W charging bump mentioned earlier, I'm not seeing any difference from the old one. Unless I'm, missing something?Tried to buy the old B variant last week from B&H and told it was discontinued. Now I know why..
Very happy to see USB-C support for stuff like iPads. Probably means they are not using that ridiculous dual DisplayPort connection over 1 Thunderbolt cable. The old monitor's Thunderbolt signal required at least one DisplayPort stream for 4K 60Hz or two DisplayPort streams for 5K. Apple has also been advertising the iPad Pro as doing 5K - I guess it took forever but this is what they had in mind
Basically everybody on here wants those blingy consumer junk monitors, since this thing looks pretty much the same as all other professional desktop monitors:
View attachment 850679
View attachment 850680
https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/lg-ultrafine-5k-owners-thread.2023452/Cool.
But how good are LG products?
I never owned LG products. But it is tempting.
return of an affordable Cinema Display
Apple said it was comparable to those very expensive (30-40k iirc) displays.
In 2005, the 23 inch Cinema HD was $1,499. That's $1965 today. They never were "affordable".
Basically everybody on here wants those blingy consumer junk monitors, since this thing looks pretty much the same as all other professional desktop monitors:
View attachment 850679
View attachment 850680
How is this better than the previous version?
Also, why is the top bezel thicker than the bottom? Bloody hell
How is this better than the previous version?
Also, why is the top bezel thicker than the bottom? Bloody hell