Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Is Apple incapable of making a nice looking, decent quality display for $1500-$2000? I don’t get it. Almost no one is going to buy those $6,000 displays (with stand), it’s simply a non-starter for the vast majority of people, including non-institutional Mac Pro buyers.
Many people will buy the 6K monitor as remember it's a reference monitor, so the ones people buy currently for that cost around 40K, and are not as powerful. They are not aimed towards regular consumers. But yes, there is clearly a market for Apple to make a monitor aimed at consumers. Most of us assumed it was coming later this year or early next year along side the new 16in MacBook Pro, but with today's announcement that means perhaps that monitor from Apple is not as imminent. For people in need of a monitor tough to know whether to settle for this one, or way an unknown amount of time for Apple's eventual one.
 
Basically everybody on here wants those blingy consumer junk monitors, since this thing looks pretty much the same as all other professional desktop monitors:

71ZJavobapL._SL1500_.jpg

dell-monitor-up3017-black-right-usage-hero-504x350-ng.png
 
Come on Apple, just release a 5k display with a stand and nano tech. You have the tech on the iMac, just make it stand alone. How difficult can that be?
Yes, I know you are afraid will canabalize Apple XDR display sales.
 
  • Like
Reactions: carlsson
So for those of us not color grading the next Star Wars film, we gotta buy this??? And where’s the HDR?
 
Come on Apple, just release a 5k display with a stand and nano tech. You have the tech on the iMac, just make it stand alone. How difficult that can be.
Yes, I know you are afraid will canabalize Apple XDR display sales.

These are the iMac 5k displays.
 
Tried to buy the old B variant last week from B&H and told it was discontinued. Now I know why..

Very happy to see USB-C support for stuff like iPads. Probably means they are not using that ridiculous dual DisplayPort connection over 1 Thunderbolt cable. The old monitor's Thunderbolt signal required at least one DisplayPort stream for 4K 60Hz or two DisplayPort streams for 5K. Apple has also been advertising the iPad Pro as doing 5K - I guess it took forever but this is what they had in mind
 
  • Like
Reactions: ImaxGuy
Have to agree here, $999 for a stand is beyond stupidity, I hope they tank hard.

In fact, that must have been the first time in a WWDC announcement ever that even the die-hard audience (finally) did not react with vacuous cheers and adulation but mumbling. And I hope it's only the beginning of more dissent. Apple's pricing hubris is mindboggling and it shows no signs of abating.

https://mashable.com/video/crowd-reaction-mac-pro-monitor-stand-wwdc-2019/?europe=true
 
Tried to buy the old B variant last week from B&H and told it was discontinued. Now I know why..

Very happy to see USB-C support for stuff like iPads. Probably means they are not using that ridiculous dual DisplayPort connection over 1 Thunderbolt cable. The old monitor's Thunderbolt signal required at least one DisplayPort stream for 4K 60Hz or two DisplayPort streams for 5K. Apple has also been advertising the iPad Pro as doing 5K - I guess it took forever but this is what they had in mind
Other than this and the 94W charging bump mentioned earlier, I'm not seeing any difference from the old one. Unless I'm, missing something?

I see they call out the ambient light sensor on this one, and that never worked on the old one, so presumably that is fixed.
 
Cool.
But how good are LG products?
I never owned LG products. But it is tempting.
https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/lg-ultrafine-5k-owners-thread.2023452/

There is a long thread here with feedback from owners of the current model. Fair number of issues reported by users there. Mine has worked pretty well, but sometimes I have to plug and unplug from my 13" MBP a couple times for it to start working.

I do have an LG OLED TV that has been flawless, so who knows.
 
Basically everybody on here wants those blingy consumer junk monitors, since this thing looks pretty much the same as all other professional desktop monitors:

View attachment 850679

View attachment 850680

I either want a bland display with nearly no bezel (similar to HP's) or a good looking display with a bezel (iMac but please a little less bezel).

I hate integrated webcams too! They are useless.
 
How is this better than the previous version?

It supports USB-C DisplayPort mode as well as Thunderbolt - so you can plug an iPad Pro into it.

Now, they don't say (or I haven't found it yet) that it supports 5K when connected to an iPad Pro - if it does then that implies that it supports DisplayPort 1.4 (you can't get 5k down a DP 1.2 link) if it doesn't then they're asking to get a slapped risk from the advertising standards authorities from everywhere outside the US.

Also, why is the top bezel thicker than the bottom? Bloody hell

The old one is the same - I guess its to accommodate the webcam at the top. It could be worse - they could have given it an iPhone Notch.

The good news is that the stand gives far better adjustability than the iMac or the old Apple TB/Cinema displays.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jimthing
Screen Shot 2019-07-30 at 3.25.21 PM.png

LG missed a HUGE opportunity by giving away the part pictured here. They could have gotten an extra $1,000 for it if they knew the market.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tucom
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.