They make little transmitters for cars that do Bluetooth. Your other option is to buy another phone. The good news is most phones will not have a headphone jack from the 1900's soon anyway.So I have fork out for a brand new car as well now?
They make little transmitters for cars that do Bluetooth. Your other option is to buy another phone. The good news is most phones will not have a headphone jack from the 1900's soon anyway.So I have fork out for a brand new car as well now?
Exactly. $20 as seen here last month:They make little transmitters for cars that do Bluetooth. ...
Not the same situation.
When they ditched the disc drive, about 98% of customers were coming from a computer that had one; not too difficult to copy any disc-based files using your old computer and then migrate to the new computer. Music CDs could be ripped into the old computer too before migration. After migration, you could just throw away your old discs, which were no longer convenient or cost-effect as a storage medium when apple got rid of disc drives anyways.
In the current case, you have a product that is in no way obsolete (headphones and earphones) and superior to Apple's proprietary "solution" in most ways : sound quality, universality, price, repairability (a lot easier to fix a broken wire than a broken bluetooth transmitter or battery), usability (the battery time will get lower and lower until you're down to 2-3 hours of playtime per charge after a year or two) and longevity (once the battery life gets crappy enough, you'll have to pay apple $75 to replace the batteries or chuck 'em; meanwhile a good set of wired headphones might last 20-30 years).
Dongles and hubs of any sort are workarounds, and invariably ****** looking and clunky. Making a simple combination of functions like using the phone and charging it at the same time require a dongle is 100%, pure bad design.
Pretending that this is just Apple "pushing innovation forward" is retarded. They could just as easily have released the AirBuds and pushed their wireless Beats products while keeping the headphone jack so as not to **** their audience. Maybe it would have meant no vibrating home button or a phone that was a half mm thicker or something. Big ****ing deal.
Omg thank you for finding that and posting for me. I didn't want to look one up...Exactly. $20 as seen here last month:
Griffin's New iTrip Clip Adapter Makes Wired Headphones Work Wirelessly
![]()
The guy said "headunit" twice.
He's saying replace the headunit, not the entire vehicle.
But, go on...
Well, suggesting people pay $50 to get back what they had before is pretty much asking for that.
No, no. Not BY the ocean. ON the ocean. At Tanagra.
Um, Bluetooth functionality comes from the headunit, not 'the car'.
It's 2016. If your headunit doesn't have Bluetooth, you should probably consider buying a new one. Lots of drivers play music in their car via Bluetooth.
Great solution.
want to listen to audio and charge your iphone in the car?
GET A NEW CAR
Brilliant idea, you are a credit to your species
Yeah, drop $20K so you can use a $600 device.
The stupid, it burns....
Many automakers took a page from the tech world (see Apple) and won't allow customers to install 3rd party head units without losing major functionality to their entertainment systems. Consumer tech has made almost everything non upgradable.
Way to go Apple. Remove the headphone socket, and then charge people for an accessory to get back what you took away.
Welcome to the club!!! People saying Bluetooth audio has lower quality because the specs says so, but their ears are not so sensible to feel difference and they listening to crappie 48bit mp3No seriously I have the Sony MR1BT and puuurfeect, no cable tangles, no issue, I can let,you phone on my desk while going to pee with headphone, just FREEDOM... Only side effect.... 30hours autonomy...(Single charge) Mou hahaha
Way to go Apple. Remove the headphone socket, and then charge people for an accessory to get back what you took away.
So, the accessory that is in the box allows you to charge the phone and listen to music through the headphone socket at the same time? That's a big part of the functionality Apple took away.Huh? That accessory is in the box with the phone and is FREE.
High end Bluetooth headphones sound very good.
Pretty sure being vocal online about it won't change anything either. The way to get change in this situation is to vote with the only thing Apple cares about. Money. So, you know. Buy a different phone. Don't buy the iPhone 7. When asked why, say it's because there wasn't a headphone jack. Then move on with your life. That's the only voice Apple is going to hear.
Actually I thought that too but research shows it varies from airline to airline regardless of FAA guidelines. United considers BT to be 'radio transmitter and receiver' and technically prohibits it though people say enforcement is erratic.Rules? Bluetooth's permitted on a plane. Heck, all the planes have wi-fi internet now.
It's just your cellphone radio that has to be off in flight (not that having it on would do you any good anyway)
Hey, the other guy was talking like his usage was the norm, I was repeating his own wording back to him.
Again, those that desperately need the analog port are a minority of Apple users, most don’t care.
I'm so annoyed at how some people can be mad that Apple doesn't innovate and yet them, as the consumer, resists change so much!!
I know! Doesn't that suck! I mean when they phased out floppy drives you had to buy an external one if you wanted to stay stuck in the past.
Great solution.
want to listen to audio and charge your iphone in the car?
GET A NEW CAR
Brilliant idea, you are a credit to your species