Because they not taken the time to read the information for themselves. They hear the taglines and story lines from media saying Facebook has changed it's name. They've not taken the time for themselves to know that Meta is the parent company for Facebook, Instagram and What's AppWhy is everyone calling FB Meta now. Google is still referred as Google, not Alphabet.
Sorry, I did a quick search and the first website I came to said it did (does not come up in a search now). It must have been mixed up with Instagram.Snapchat is not under Meta/Facebook
That’s a meaningless statistic.
Would you rather have a minority share of the market or a majority share? That seems like a simple question, but it’s really not. If you’re Apple, you’d rather have a minority share, so long as that “minority” share is the top end of the market, where all the money is.
If they wanted pure market share they could do what Dell and Samsung and others do and churn out plasticky garbage devices that cost very little to make and, likewise, earn very little in profit because the margins at the bottom of the market are razor thin.
Apple would rather have the top 20% than the bottom 80%, because there is vastly more money to be made with that arrangement.
Let apple lead the way giving up it’s profits for the good of the world.Now imagine if all those billions went towards people’s social well being instead of being pocketed for profit. And it’s been what, barely a year?
If you want to solve the cost of social programs, benefits, and entitlements, it will be through monetizing personal data not for the benefit of business, but for the benefit of people.
I'm not falling for it. It will always be Facebook to me.Why is everyone calling FB Meta now. Google is still referred as Google, not Alphabet.
Is this not a social media site?This is great news. Social media is a cancer on society.
Maybe it's because nobody has made a recent thread in the proper section of this forum for such a question and debate, that thread being 'Site Feedback' with a thread asking 'Why is Macrumours tracking me?'.I don't get it. People on this post are calling out Facebook. But this very site, Macrumors does the exact same thing and no one is calling them out.
View attachment 1899635
View attachment 1899636
A very large number of folks love FB. They aren’t the ones that post about not liking FB, though. There’s also a very large number of folks that don’t like FB. Admittedly, there MAY be some crossoverIf so many people hate FB, then why is it still around?
That’s not surprising and pretty common knowledge. All app developers are looking for whales, folks that have no problem spending large amounts of money on their game. Whales are NEVER a large number of users, and they don’t HAVE to be. If your game has tens of thousands of users and only 5% are whales, you’re still making a profit over time.70% of Apple's App Store Revenue comes from Game Apps !
Less than 10% of Apple's consumers buy apps OR purchase IAPs !
I agree. If advertisers see a drop in their app store revenue due to Apple's ATT blocking the functions of their ad's, the advertisers will pull out of providing their services to app developers and without these advertisers, a huge chunck of app store dev's would not be able to financially support their app which means the app would eventually be pulled away from the app store. The more apps that get moved off the store will mean it will have a less desirable impact on dev's wanting to build apps for the store.I was actually thinking about this from a different perspective over the weekend.
We had CNBC on in the office all of last week, Earnings week.
Consider this ...
What if Apple had their Privacy features in-place from the Get Go of the App Store, instead of ONLY fairly recently ?
IMO, it's a great exercise to consider the implications.
And really for anyone.
I'll start, I don't think there would be ANY 100% FREE apps, NOT ones of any real value.
I believe the Race to the Bottom "was enabled" by Ads !
I believe Apple benefited significantly from 100% FREE apps.
It may take some time, but I do believe 100% FREE apps will go the way of the Do Do Bird.
And, that Apple will take a hit to its value because of it.
Specifically, Apple consumers who are UN-willing to pay for their apps or the services that those apps provide, will lose their Enthusiasm for Apple's products.
IMO, easy to predict !
70% of Apple's App Store Revenue comes from Game Apps !
Less than 10% of Apple's consumers buy apps OR purchase IAPs !
As such, more than 90% of Apple consumers could lose their Enthusiasm (to some extent) for Apple products !
What Apple has done is very risky to them !
I guarantee you're not seeing less ads; you're seeing less targeted ads which facebook and google make more money from.Exactly. If we, as consumers, want to see fewer ads, we are going to have to be willing to pony up some money to make that happen. Nothing is free. If you're not buying the product, you are the product.
You can hate something and still need to use for various reasons...They use Facebook but hate on it. Weird
Did that in 2014, and I never regreted it since.Great news to start a Monday. I'm planning on retiring from Meta/Book soon anyway.