Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
In a bubble, yes, but if that segment was in the least bit profitable Apple would have never left it. Considering they have already established connections with the panels they get from LG and would not have been starting from scratch, choosing to leave this market is telling on it's profitability.
This means nothing to your average user. I get it — and I'm not disagreeing — but this will not propel its self into sales worth the effort. Corporations will not purchase them in bulk over the cheaper sets they have access to nor will it appeal to those buying the Mac Pro.

You're bending yourself and your arguments into pretzels to support the current Apple stance.

Let's move on and agree to respectfully disagree.
 
It'd be a secondary display for iMacs, iMac Pros, and MacBooks. As well, you have a "headless" system. Two of them. Mac mini, and Mac Pro.

On top of this, I do personally know some PC users who bought even the Apple Cinema Display, as it was a great looking monitor to replace the ugly/plasticky PC monitors. I was one of them a long time ago now as well back when I was on my last "super cool, water-cooled PC adventure" I went on while I still build my own systems.

I think Apple is missing out as well. It's also not pricing iMac's out ... that makes no sense.

Thank you - Precisely.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tarantularock
You can also look at other companies products. How many different motherboard designs does a vendor like Dell crank out every year? Apple is much more profitable and has a lot more money in the bank. There is no reason most of their products can't have a feature update annually or that they couldn't have more options at different price points vs how they just throw more ram or a faster CPU with no other upgrades into the same enclosure year after year.

Very true, and honestly the "sub XDR level" Apple Display need not sell in mega volume, just like ACD 30's of the past were a bit niche also. It can be another "halo product" just down a few rungs.
 
Yeah but @Websnapx2 not everything Apple builds is intended to sell at the same rate as iPhones. Apple used to sell a 24" display.

It may very well be a niche market. But no more niche than some of the other products Apple produces. Again, Apple doesn't need to sell every item as some "massive profit mover" otherwise they wouldn't be selling $700 Mac Pro wheels ;) *hint hint* - the other thing about displays, is they don't need to be re-designed yearly and actually have a pretty solid lifespan.
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbineseaplane
Disagree.

People here want pro, but not too pro or it gets expensive and hurts their feelings. People want consumer but not too consumer or they don’t like the specs and it hurts their feelings. People want prosumer but not too prosumer or it may as well be one or the other, or it’s the wrong spec or form factor.

Who exactly are these “most professionals” you’re talking about? The ones buying the HP 4K reference monitor for $2000 more than the Pro Display XDR? The ones buying the Panasonic HD reference monitor for $4000 more than the Pro Display XDR? The Sony Trimaster for 5 times more than the Pro Display XDR? Who are these people? Mostly?
I am a professional in my job, but, I do not need this Mac nor a fast PC for that, seems like many think here that a professional is a person who's at the top of the ladder, as in, video content creators for big providers, guess what, a dentist is a professional, I in my job am a professional, a part time wedding videographer can be a professional.

Smug comes to my mind, pretty sure most could do with the old cheese grater with upgraded parts, not this machine.
 
a dentist is a professional, I in my job am a professional, a part time wedding videographer can be a professional.

So true - in fact Apple should know pretty well that "iOS developers" are also professionals and firmly in a niche that could use multiple displays, but for whom the XDR is absolute and utter overkill.

...but those people are likely big Apple hardware fans and would love their 2nd or 3rd displays to aesthetically match their main machines.

Just look at all the photos people post of their setups.
People do care how their office computing situations look - no question about it.

I just had a Planar IX2790 here (two of them actually - both returned for bum panels) and the dark, spacey black, iMac Pro look of it was AWESOME in real life (better than in online photos). The thing is made from plastic too!

Even LG, using plastic, could have made the UF 5k look so so much better than they did. Apple could hit a home run doing it themselves, no question about it --- with huge margins too.

(Pics attached - disaster mess desk setup since I'm in between reconfigs - sorry)
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0499.jpeg
    IMG_0499.jpeg
    307.6 KB · Views: 82
  • IMG_0500.jpeg
    IMG_0500.jpeg
    358.6 KB · Views: 76
Different panel & implementation actually. (the QQ1 vs QQ2)
See my earlier posts.

The fused glass they did for the iMacs makes for a considerably superior usage experience.

So, you think the panels are "$200-300 at cost". You think people will spend more for a premium experience.

Let's say it's $300.

Tell me again why, if your panel cost is correct, this mythical display wouldn't be $700 and therefore half the price of the LG Ultrafine (which is already extremely niche), except you somehow think it should cost 150% the price?

No one is buying that. As a 20 year designer who works for a large corporation and is involved in large scale purchasing decisions — I'm telling you that it is a niche market.

Exactly. They get two 4k displays, if even that, and they're done.

Maybe they'll get a specialized display from Eizo or HP.
 
What did I miss, genius? (if you are going to be rude while not making a point I can return in-kind)
[automerge]1590524312[/automerge]

All I said is computers as a whole are a terrible line of business to be in if you want to be vastly profitable, and if being extremely profitable is the goal (30-40% margins), then we should give up on Macs being around long term. Nobody said they should give things away. So yes, learn to read before writing 5 huge paragraphs about nothing. No point arguing with someone who thinks his vast intellect is above everyone else in the forum.
 
So, you think the panels are "$200-300 at cost". You think people will spend more for a premium experience.

Let's say it's $300.

Tell me again why, if your panel cost is correct, this mythical display wouldn't be $700 and therefore half the price of the LG Ultrafine (which is already extremely niche), except you somehow think it should cost 150% the price?



Exactly. They get two 4k displays, if even that, and they're done.

Maybe they'll get a specialized display from Eizo or HP.

LOL ... "you think people will spend more for a premium experience". Dude, you're on a MAC forum aren't you? I have news for you ... ALL Apple products are products that people pay more for, for a premium experience.

Did I misinterpret your response ... or ? LOL I'm making my exit here. I've spent too much time on this thread lol been fun though
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbineseaplane
So true - in fact Apple should know pretty well that "iOS developers" are also professionals and firmly in a niche that could use multiple displays, but for whom the XDR is absolute and utter overkill.

...but those people are likely big Apple hardware fans and would love their 2nd or 3rd displays to aesthetically match their main machines.

iOS developers want their displays to match their main machines??

Quite a few iOS developers don't really want a Mac at all; they need one because that's where the iOS toolchain exists. And of those that do want a Mac, almost nobody cares what the display looks like, because it's a work machine, not a bathroom mirror.

Just look at all the photos people post of their setups.

You think those are representative of the hundreds of thousands of iOS developers?
[automerge]1590525469[/automerge]
LOL ... "you think people will spend more for a premium experience". Dude, you're on a MAC forum aren't you? I have news for you ... ALL Apple products are products that people pay more for, for a premium experience.

Did I misinterpret your response ... or ? LOL

No, you didn't just misinterpret it; you also took it out of context.
 
I bet you're not a very good iOS designer/developer if you don't care what your environment looks like you work out of ;) Just saying ... the true professionals of their craft care as much or more about the tools they use to create the products, as the products themselves. Myself included.
[automerge]1590525881[/automerge]
@turbineseaplane - you're into aviation as well? Nice :) (side note haha)
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbineseaplane
I bet you're not a very good iOS designer/developer if you don't care what your environment looks like you work out of ;) Just saying ... the true professionals of their craft care as much or more about the tools they use to create the products, as the products themselves. Myself included.

Have you tried not making presumptions about other people's job performance?

Oh, oh, I can play that game, too: I bet you're a terrible team player who constantly tells colleagues how they don't care about their craft enough.
 
It's a pretty valid presumption based on psychology. If you don't care about your environment, or the tools you use, you're not as passionate and generally speaking, that translates to not being as good as someone else who does care about those things.

Sorry ... and yeah, that's a good presumption. I'm only a good team player when others I work with care to the same degree I do, about quality. Good call
 
  • Like
Reactions: Detnator
All I said is computers as a whole are a terrible line of business to be in if you want to be vastly profitable, and if being extremely profitable is the goal (30-40% margins), then we should give up on Macs being around long term.
How so, when that exact thinking in that exact market got them exactly where they are? What a weird thought to land on.

Nobody said they should give things away.
I didn't say give things away I said charity — which is exactly what they would be if they entered into markets they cannot dominate when they are almost guaranteed to be on the upper level of cost in that market. To compete even with the LG model (you know, the company that actually makes the panel) they would need to find a price point between that and an entry-level 5K iMac, because honestly if the 5k Monitor was more expensive than 1700, I'd just get the iMac as a second monitor.

So yes, learn to read before writing 5 huge paragraphs about nothing. No point arguing with someone who thinks his vast intellect is above everyone else in the forum.
They weren't "about nothing", they just didn't fit your narrative. You are entitled to your opinion — as am I — mine is just about thinking about the market logically, rather than being upset about what I cannot have.

What you are asking for is too niche of a request for apple to concern its self with — accept it or not. I don't care, but facts are facts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Detnator
How so, when that exact thinking in that exact market got them exactly where they are? What a weird thought to land on.


I didn't say give things away I said charity — which is exactly what they would be if they entered into markets they cannot dominate when they are almost guaranteed to be on the upper level of cost in that market. To compete even with the LG model (you know, the company that actually makes the panel) they would need to find a price point between that and an entry-level 5K iMac, because honestly if the 5k Monitor was more expensive than 1700, I'd just get the iMac as a second monitor.


They weren't "about nothing", they just didn't fit your narrative. You are entitled to your opinion — as am I — mine is just about thinking about the market logically, rather than being upset about what I cannot have.

What you are asking for is too niche of a request for apple to concern its self with — accept it or not. I don't care, but facts are facts.
Give things away, charity, sound the same thing to me.

And while we are on the topic of learn to read. You are apparently arguing with the wrong person, I was never discussing LCDs.

Markets they cannot dominate?
They don't dominate computers, so they should exit?
They don't dominate headphones, should they exit?
They don't dominate set top boxes, should they exit?
They don't dominate against After Effects, should they shut down Motion?
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbineseaplane
Beautiful displays if I do say so myself. Nice work Apple
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1363.jpeg
    IMG_1363.jpeg
    267.7 KB · Views: 72
Different people want and need different things. That's natural. What is unnatural, is Apple trying to satisfy all these different people with very limited set of devices. This is the disadvantage of Apple ecosystem.
Limited set of devices?? That’s new. The usual criticism is that they’re confusing and congesting their lineups with too many products. Which Apple do you mean?
 
Beautiful displays if I do say so myself. Nice work Apple

Nice setup. One of the things I hate most about using TB for docking is that the ports are on the side of the MBP, and no body makes a right angle TB3 cable. I've actually asked dock manufacturers why they can't make a MacBook Pro friendly cable when most of their customers are MBP users...I want my cable to go straight back, not to take up half my desk snaking around. I use a cheap USB-C right angle adapter that isn't certified for TB, thank god it works... but the connection is a bit loose and sometime the dock disconnects if you bump the cable. Grr
 
  • Like
Reactions: eflx
Nice setup. One of the things I hate most about using TB for docking is that the ports are on the side of the MBP, and no body makes a right angle TB3 cable. I've actually asked dock manufacturers why they can't make a MacBook Pro friendly cable when most of their customers are MBP users...I want my cable to go straight back, not to take up half my desk snaking around. I use a cheap USB-C right angle adapter that isn't certified for TB, thank god it works... but the connection is a bit loose and sometime the dock disconnects if you bump the cable. Grr

Thanks!

Yeah, you're right actually. Someone should come out with a right angle cable for MacBooks kind of like the old MagSafe connectors that came out on a right angle.

I'm trying to find a solid 2 meter cable of the same quality Apple provides with the XDR displays, and will probably use a CalDigit dock with my setup. The 2meter cable is just long enough that I can use the full range of height adjustment on my desk I need.

Can only imagine people talking about the price of Thunderbolt cables next lol and how they've priced pro users out of the market :)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.