If an IPAD PRO for Cook is a real computer then next Mini will be the new pro.
Twisted... but I see your logic. IPAD Mini Pro. Now that might have some folk excited.
If an IPAD PRO for Cook is a real computer then next Mini will be the new pro.
Cookie: Coming soon! We just won't tell you how soon, though it's not as soon you want or hope. Muahahaha.Great.
Now do the Mac Mini.
What about the Mac Mini though?
Where did you get that from? You're assumptions are the reason why Apple is not more transparent with customers.
I'm guessing this will include the Mac Mini too. It makes sense to create a Mac that if bare boned can be used as a Mini and built up to a Pro.
Whats grilling me though, is that they've only seen fit since last year to look into workflow as a basis to build on top of, and frankly that is something that they should have been doing for many years ago. It also explains why they have their annoying habit of replacing software with new versions that lack the functionality of older ones -- the most obvious example being FCPX, which is fantastic now, but was released way too early to be a workflow replacement for FCP9 and resulted in the response we all know.
Acknowledging this does leave me at least hopeful for the future of their Pro hardware & software. Particularly so since I haven't been super confident about long term, especially with these recent rumours of future ARM Macs in 2020 and beyond.
why so long????
Hell yeah. But make it smaller...about 1/4 the size of the Cheese Grater.I don't understand what the issue is. Go back to a case design similar to the previous Mac Pro. Throw in a 1000w psu with multiple PCIe cables, use a motherboard that has 2 sockets for the latest Xeon chips, has standard PCIe slots and add as many USB-C TB3 compliant ports as possible. If they did that, they can charge me whatever they want.
This article is about the Mac Pro. Why is everyone asking about the Mac Mini?