Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
What you’re referring to is an entirely different thing.
The article reveals commitments for specific model numbers whereas your screenshot is more general. No one has previously written about these specific model commitments. If they had, you wouldn’t have had digitimes saying Apple will use x60 in the iPhone 12.

Does that really add anything meaningful? Did anybody think Apple was going to use X50 this year? Or still use X55 in 2024?
 
I guess Qualcomm have the best chipset for the next 2-3 years and with this settlement they will probably use them for a while after that also.

I was rooting for Apple to make their own but I guess this will do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MartyvH
My first thought was, "Maybe I should wait till next year." But then, I could say that every year. Eventually we'll have iPhones that last a week on a single charge and pick up transmissions from Mars. But for now I'll settle for the 12.
 
Huawei and Samsung both make 5G smartphone modems and base station chips. Yes, that includes mmWave.

You're gonna have to provide evidence. Not that a Huawei modem would ever be an option for Apple, but Samsung would. Please provide links to 5G smartphones that support mmWave powered by Samsung modems. Thanks in advance.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: freedomlinux
You're gonna have to provide evidence. Not that a Huawei modem would ever be an option for Apple, but Samsung would. Please provide links to 5G smartphones that support mmWave powered by Samsung modems. Thanks in advance.

Samsung S20 uses Exynos 990
Huawei P40 uses Balong 5000

Seriously, you couldn't Google these yourself?
 
You know Qualcomm invented 5G, right? They deserve to get paid for all of that research and development, not to mention the fact that they make the best 5G modems in the world. Intel couldn't even engineer a working modem!

Please look at what a standard essential patent is. Patents that are critically related to 5G are considered as standard essentials patents.

And no, Qualcomm did not invent 5G.
 
You're gonna have to provide evidence. Not that a Huawei modem would ever be an option for Apple, but Samsung would. Please provide links to 5G smartphones that support mmWave powered by Samsung modems. Thanks in advance.
Ericsson is quite big in developing base stations too, not chips for phones as far as I’m aware...

 
Samsung S20 uses Exynos 990
Huawei P40 uses Balong 5000

Seriously, you couldn't Google these yourself?

The Samsung S20 powered by Exynos doesn't support mmWave, though. Only the Qualcomm Snapdragon-powered version with the Qualcomm X55 modem does.
 
Ericsson is quite big in developing base stations too, not chips for phones as far as I’m aware...



Ericsson doesn't make the chips (as you stated). Their base stations are mostly powered by Qualcomm chips
 
It does. Use Google. Exynos Modem 5123.

Try again. https://www.anandtech.com/show/1560...-exynos-snapdragon-review-megalomania-devices

Snapdragon 5G - Snapdragon Modem X55 (Discrete)

(LTE Category 24/22)
DL = 2500 Mbps - 7x20MHz CA, 1024-QAM
UL = 316 Mbps 3x20MHz CA, 256-QAM

(5G NR Sub-6 + mmWave*)
DL = 7000 Mbps
UL = 3000 Mbps

*Depending on region and model
Exynos 5G - Exynos Modem 5123 (Discrete)

(LTE Category 24/22)
DL = 3000 Mbps 8x20MHz CA 1024-QAM
UL = 422 Mbps ?x20MHz CA, 256-QAM

(5G NR Sub-6)
DL = 5100 Mbps
Exynos 4G - Exynos Modem 5213 (Discrete)

(LTE Category 24/22)
DL = 3000 Mbps 8x20MHz CA 1024-QAM
UL = 422 Mbps ?x20MHz CA, 256-QAM
 
Try again. https://www.anandtech.com/show/1560...-exynos-snapdragon-review-megalomania-devices

Snapdragon 5G - Snapdragon Modem X55 (Discrete)

(LTE Category 24/22)
DL = 2500 Mbps - 7x20MHz CA, 1024-QAM
UL = 316 Mbps 3x20MHz CA, 256-QAM

(5G NR Sub-6 + mmWave*)
DL = 7000 Mbps
UL = 3000 Mbps

*Depending on region and model
Exynos 5G - Exynos Modem 5123 (Discrete)

(LTE Category 24/22)
DL = 3000 Mbps 8x20MHz CA 1024-QAM
UL = 422 Mbps ?x20MHz CA, 256-QAM

(5G NR Sub-6)
DL = 5100 Mbps
Exynos 4G - Exynos Modem 5213 (Discrete)

(LTE Category 24/22)
DL = 3000 Mbps 8x20MHz CA 1024-QAM
UL = 422 Mbps ?x20MHz CA, 256-QAM
What are you talking about?? The model is out there... https://www.theverge.com/2020/5/19/...0-uw-ultra-wideband-mmwave-verizon-date-color
 
Not sure this went "under the radar."

The settlement between Qualcomm made it clear Apple was going to use Qualcomm modems for at least the next 6 years.

View attachment 970683
No, the supply agreement was never specified as anything other than multi-year. This new information shows Apple’s intention to use at least the X65 in a launch sometime in 2022-2024.

The real info here is that Apple thought their own 5G modem might be ready for fall 2023 such that no X70 devices would be necessary.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dnywlsh_
It does. Use Google. Exynos Modem 5123.


You aren't wrong. But do you really thing Apple didn't perform due diligence and select the best performing chips for their phones? The last thing they want is another Intel modem fiasco
 
  • Like
Reactions: Homme
Try again. https://www.anandtech.com/show/1560...-exynos-snapdragon-review-megalomania-devices

Snapdragon 5G - Snapdragon Modem X55 (Discrete)

(LTE Category 24/22)
DL = 2500 Mbps - 7x20MHz CA, 1024-QAM
UL = 316 Mbps 3x20MHz CA, 256-QAM

(5G NR Sub-6 + mmWave*)
DL = 7000 Mbps
UL = 3000 Mbps

*Depending on region and model
Exynos 5G - Exynos Modem 5123 (Discrete)

(LTE Category 24/22)
DL = 3000 Mbps 8x20MHz CA 1024-QAM
UL = 422 Mbps ?x20MHz CA, 256-QAM

(5G NR Sub-6)
DL = 5100 Mbps
Exynos 4G - Exynos Modem 5213 (Discrete)

(LTE Category 24/22)
DL = 3000 Mbps 8x20MHz CA 1024-QAM
UL = 422 Mbps ?x20MHz CA, 256-QAM

So you'll ignore Samsung's own specs. And pretend because a device doesn't have an mmWave antenna, the modem doesn't mmWave.

 
So you'll ignore Samsung's own specs. And pretend because a device doesn't have an mmWave antenna, the modem doesn't mmWave.


Again, mmWave is not enabled on their devices. It doesn't exist yet. There is no Exynos-powered smartphone that uses an Exynos modem and supports mmWave. This is not complicated.
 
So you'll ignore Samsung's own specs. And pretend because a device doesn't have an mmWave antenna, the modem doesn't mmWave.



There's more factors to it than data rates. Their is chip reliability, power efficiency, etc..

Why do you think Samsung continues to use snap dragon modems despite exynos performance being about the same? It is about more than just speed.
 
That's the Qualcomm-powered version. You just made the point for me. There is no Exynos version that supports mmWave.
Hmm, this page https://www.samsung.com/semiconduct...3726X1523008X48dafef91febcac9d3b21bccfcd2b02a says otherwise:

Powered by Samsung’s cutting-edge innovations, Exynos Modem 5123 delivers unrivaled performance to unlock the power of ultra-fast connectivity. In 5G, the modem supports mmWave and sub-6GHz spectrums, as well as NSA and SA networks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ramchi
I guess Qualcomm have the best chipset for the next 2-3 years and with this settlement they will probably use them for a while after that also.

I was rooting for Apple to make their own but I guess this will do.
and they still might do their own modem, it might not go into an iPhone at first, who knows?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.