Apple's Search Engine Negotiations With Google Took Months of Near-Daily Meetings

Discussion in 'MacRumors.com News Discussion' started by MacRumors, Jun 10, 2019.

  1. MacRumors macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    Establishing a billion dollar search engine deal with Google took Apple more than four months, according to new details shared today by former Apple lawyer Bruce Sewell.

    Sewell recently did an interview with a Columbia law student, which was noticed this afternoon by CNBC, and in the interview, he shared details on his time at Apple and some of the negotiations he handled for the company.


    According to Sewell, he attended near daily meetings with Google CEO Sundar Pichai and Google lawyer Kent Walker when hammering out a deal, working alongside Tim Cook or Eddy Cue.
    Sewell did not go into detail about the amount of money that Google pays Apple to be the primary search engine on Apple devices, but in the past, Google has been rumored to be paying billions for the privilege.

    Sewell says that in his time at Apple, he had 900 people working under him. 600 of those were in the law group and included lawyers and paralegals.

    In just one of the Samsung lawsuits, Apple had 350 people billing time on that case at any given moment, most of which were outside counsel because it's impossible for Apple to handle cases of that magnitude with an internal team. "And this was just one of them. There were seven of them going on," said Sewell.

    There were seven or eight billion documents to review, and collectively, law firms billed Apple 280,000 hours. Sewell says his budget was "just shy of a billion dollars a year."

    Sewell says that he steered Apple in the wrong direction on its iBooks negotiations, leading to the iBooks snafu with the U.S. government that cost Apple a lot of money because he didn't know about deals publishers made among themselves. Cook, though, was forgiving and said he'd made the right choices.
    During the interview, Sewell also shared a few tidbits about Apple CEO Tim Cook, who he said would send him emails in the very early morning due to Cook's "crazy" work schedule.
    Sewell had other thoughts to share on working as a traditional lawyer vs. working for a major company as legal counsel, and his shift from Intel to Apple, which he likened to going to kindergarten from university given Apple's focus on creativity. The full interview can be watched in the video up above.

    From 2009 to 2017, Bruce Sewell served as Apple's general counsel before retiring at the end of 2017. Sewell has since been replaced by Katherine Adams.

    Article Link: Apple's Search Engine Negotiations With Google Took Months of Near-Daily Meetings
     
  2. autrefois, Jun 10, 2019
    Last edited: Jun 10, 2019

    autrefois macrumors 65816

    autrefois

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2003
    Location:
    Somewhere in the USA
    #2
    $1 billion: the price for Apple to abandon its stated goal of promoting user privacy.

    EDIT: changed “protecting” to “promoting”
     
  3. tennisproha macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2011
    Location:
    Texas
  4. Baymowe335 macrumors 601

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2017
    #4
    This is a nonsense statement.
     
  5. Saipher macrumors demi-god

    Saipher

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2014
    Location:
    CA
    #5
    Hmm, for Sewell’s browser?? :p
     
  6. SBlue1 macrumors 65816

    SBlue1

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    #6
    Legal budget a billion a year. What a waste of money.
     
  7. ugahairydawgs macrumors 68030

    ugahairydawgs

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2010
    #7
    $9b if you believe the estimate done by Goldman.

    This deal Apple has going with Google has often struck me as a little weird these last few years when Apple has been so focused on privacy and the respect of customer data. I use DuckDuckGo and it works good enough for me, but I doubt there are many that jump in there and change the search default preference.
     
  8. realtuner macrumors 6502a

    realtuner

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2019
    Location:
    Canada
    #8
    Privacy intact since Google doesn't get a single bit of identifying information from my iOS devices (that is, if I actually used Google instead of DDG).
     
  9. Mac-lover3 macrumors 6502a

    Mac-lover3

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2014
    Location:
    Belgium
    #9
    I can't blame Apple. Google is still the best search engine available. I'm using DuckDuckGo now most of the time but it still has its short comings.
     
  10. autrefois macrumors 65816

    autrefois

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2003
    Location:
    Somewhere in the USA
    #10
    Changed it to “promoting” privacy. Apple say they care about it, but DuckDuckGo would be a win in that department.
     
  11. JGIGS, Jun 10, 2019
    Last edited: Jun 10, 2019

    JGIGS macrumors 65816

    JGIGS

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2008
    Location:
    CANADA!
    #11
    How is it a nonsense statement when everyone in here complains how Google gives away your data and won't use their services/apps?

    You can't have it both ways. Google can't be evil privacy breakers while Apple uses them as the default browser and are the masters of keeping your info private.
     
  12. Westside guy macrumors 603

    Westside guy

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2003
    Location:
    The soggy side of the Pacific NW
    #12
    Little known fact: Part of Cook's "crazy work schedule" involves overnight baking binges followed by sneaking into senior executives' houses to leave baked goods on the kitchen counter.
     
  13. now i see it macrumors 68040

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2002
    #13
    Google may have paid  a $ billion to be the "default" search engine but I no longer use them for search anymore. There comes a time when enough tracking is enough.
    I reach towards the Google icon out of habit , but always stop myself, remembering what a bad choice that is.
    The fact that they paid a billion to be the default search engine for Apple is reason enough not to use them.
     
  14. realtuner macrumors 6502a

    realtuner

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2019
    Location:
    Canada
    #14
    People still don't get this. Apple is sending ANONYMOUS data to Google. No real name, no AppleID, no e-mail address, no phone number, no IMEI, no DeviceID - nothing that could identify users.
     
  15. Pakaku macrumors 68020

    Pakaku

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2009
    #15
    The fact that Apple still does business with Google is worrisome at best, and completely contradictory to their (supposed) morals in general

    Even if the info is anonymous, they're still giving the false impression that people should be using Google as their default search engine, and indirectly promoting Google in the process where they can spy on you if you end up tempted into trying their other services (Gmail and so forth)
     
  16. Zaft macrumors 68040

    Zaft

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2009
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
  17. goobot macrumors 603

    goobot

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2009
    Location:
    long island NY
    #17
    Realistically the mass majority would choose to use google as their search tool. Why would Apple pass up a billion to give their users what they want anyway? On top of that if they used anything else people would complain how bad the iPhone was a searching for things on the net.
     
  18. Doctor Q Administrator

    Doctor Q

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2002
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    #18
    I find this to be the most interesting comment. A lot of CEOs would have had his head on a stick.
     
  19. macfacts macrumors 68040

    macfacts

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2012
    Location:
    Cybertron
    #19
    It was $1 billion / yr during first Samsung vs apple trial. Now it is $9 billion /yr
     
  20. badatusernames macrumors regular

    badatusernames

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2018
    #20
    I am surprised Tim didn't fire him. I think that's one quality of a good leader (being able to forgive and understanding when needed)
     
  21. macfacts macrumors 68040

    macfacts

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2012
    Location:
    Cybertron
    #21
    But your IP and the search info you typed in is still sent to Google. Your privacy is gone. Most iOS users are not into customizations and will use the default. Apple is in charge of setting that default.
     
  22. I7guy macrumors Core

    I7guy

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2013
    Location:
    Gotta be in it to win it
    #22
    How do you figure that? Should Apple say screw you to net neutrality? Block google from its devices? Does Apple send unsolicited user data to google? Might as well get paid as users will “google” anyway.
    --- Post Merged, Jun 10, 2019 ---
    And there is nothing wrong with choice. One can change these settings if they want. Good for Apple for getting paid for what users would do anyway.
    --- Post Merged, Jun 10, 2019 ---
    In this case you sure can have it both way. Should Apple forget about net neutrality and block google. Does Apple give away your data? iOS for Apple for being paid for what users would do anyway.
     
  23. DocMultimedia macrumors 6502a

    DocMultimedia

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2012
    Location:
    Charlottesville, VA
    #23
    Luckily MacRumors preserves all your privacy as you type comments here. Lol. The only privacy left on the web is not being on the web. I think Apple making money from Google just to keep a default search engine a good deal for Apple. Disclosure: I own Apple stock. :)
     
  24. I7guy macrumors Core

    I7guy

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2013
    Location:
    Gotta be in it to win it
    #24
    People get it, they ignore it. Apple should do what they do and ignore the critics.
     
  25. RudySnow macrumors 6502

    RudySnow

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2016
    Location:
    Tyler, TX
    #25
    No, yours is. Google does absolutely nothing to protect users’ privacy. Apple knows it, and Cook discusses it often. Yet, they’ll take Google’s. Heck like a good little hypocrite. I’m surprised Facebook hasn’t paid Apple to get their app on iOS as a default if the money is that important.
    --- Post Merged, Jun 10, 2019 ---
    Yeah? Check how many cookies Google Analytics downloads into Safari and then tell us otherwise. If Google had no incentive to grab your data, why in the hell would they pay billions for nothing?
     

Share This Page

110 June 10, 2019