Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I have Thunderbolt Display and it's awesome. The LCD is great, though it might not be the best in the current market but the overall package doesn't compare to anything available right now.
 
The aluminium ACD is the pinnacle of  monitor. Standard matte screen finish. Clean lines, capacitive brightness adjustment on the side! 😍

Just recycle the design with a 2021 specced monitor and i/o and i'll be happy haha
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbineseaplane
I've got a 24" model that was a steady workhouse until COVID hit last year. 5K iMac came home from work with me at that time and the Cinema Display was unceremoniously "retired." It is still sitting on the floor under my desk these 15 months later.
 
I'm glad to see so many people want Apple to introduce a new Mac monitor. My guess is that if Apple does build one it will be designed to go with the new iMac for multi-display set-ups. Add me to the list of those who would buy a new Apple branded display on release.
 
I'm glad to see so many people want Apple to introduce a new Mac monitor. My guess is that if Apple does build one it will be designed to go with the new iMac for multi-display set-ups. Add me to the list of those who would buy a new Apple branded display on release.
I think it is the same amount of people in uproar when they discontinued the TBD and released the LG monitors.

As I have a relationship with the business team, I let them know my thoughts on this quite clearly when it happened :)

it is top of my list of things that really frustrate me about Apple. Everything is designed to the nth degree, then the major element on your desk that is looked at the most, is a third party item.

It makes no sense to me whatsoever, and really am hoping they remedy this. In fact it will be an instant purchase if they release a monitor that ís a reasonable price [for a pro who doesnt make movies.....]
 
I have two and still love it. If you had a powerful mac notebook, it was the best of both worlds. Big monitor, portability and a way to get newer notebooks to accept Ethernet or FW.
 
Anyone TB display cable (MagSafe power & TB split) got somewhat busted that connection would intermittently go off?

I bought another TB cable to connect to my mac as a workaround. But I wonder how many of you take it to Apple or Apple Authorized Service Provider to replace the original cable. And what's your experience?

Amazon sells the replacement cable; but I would rather get the genuine cable instead.
 
I love the Thunderbolt!!! Wish Apple would make a consumer display ($500). Having a display with decent speakers, webcam and being able to control volume/brightness with OS X would be tops.
If Apple would literally just take the 5K display from the iMac and sell it for $999 I would take two to put on either side of my 5K iMac. Anyone know how much the display component of the iMac costs Apple? It's a really nice LCD but I feel like it can't be that much since the 5K starts at $1799.
 
What happened from High Sierra to Big Sur? First thing I noticed on my 20” ACD was how crappy the text looked.
High Sierra was the last Mac OS to natively implement subpixel rendering, which made use of the RGB subpixels to significantly increase the resolution in one direction, enabling text to be far sharper. There's a whole thread about it here: https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/the-subpixel-aa-debacle-and-font-rendering.2184484/

It can be reimplemented in Mojave through the command line, but I've found text still isn't as sharp as with HS (perhaps because HS was natively designed to work with subpixel rendering, while Mojave was not).

Incidentally, this isn't the first time Apple made a change to its text rendering that obsoleted older monitors. Snow Leopard was the last OS that looked good with an HD (~100 ppi) monitor. Thus I stuck with SL for many years after its expiration until I was able to upgrade to a 27" 4k, which is ~160 ppi. That worked well until Mojave, which obsoleted non-retina montiors (at least for me).

Apple has traditionally been more concered with preserving the glyph shape of fonts than with readabiliy. Windows (with ClearType), by contrast, has emphasized readability. (It's probably the only thing I prefer about Windows, especially when using lower-grade monitors). Compare text readability with, say, a 24" FHD (1920 x 1080) or 24" WUXGA (1920 x 1200) monitor on Windows 10 vs. Mojave/Catalina/Big Sur. The difference is striking. I own both of those; fortunately, they're secondary monitors, so I can tolerate them in High Sierra.

That is mostly just apple marketing honestly.

I have been using 4K at 27 and 28 inches with various scaling modes for a long while and I enjoy it fine.

I even use scaling that Apple would be aghast about I’m sure because my eyes are getting older and I like things a touch bigger.
I find it varies by individual, and the OS you are using. It depends on how you use your monitor, how sharp your near-field vision is, how sensitive you are to text that isn't crisp, and whether you are using something later than High Sierra. With High Sierra, I'm fine with my 4k/27" monitor (~160 ppi), but that's only because High Sierra natively implements subpixel rendering. With Mojave/Catalina/Big Sur, I need a retina monitor to avoid eyestrain. Since my primary monitor is 4k/27", I'm stuck with High Sierra until I can upgrade to a large retina display.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: patsfan83
I'm of the opinion it is going to replace both the 27 iMac and 27 iMac Pro and they are going to take it more upscale. Thinking 30" and 16GB/512GB standard - so that will increase starting price. I guess they could make a M1 8/256GB version and try to keep a $1799 or $1999 price point.

Even a M2 or whatever it is called could be as low as $1799, but you can clearly see why Apple made the step from Intel to AS, more money to be made.

This is essentially what many expected/hoped the 2021 iMac would be like.
With smaller bezels then.
 


Apple now considers the 27-inch Thunderbolt Display to be a "vintage" product because it has been close to five years since it was last offered for sale.

thunderbolt-display.jpg

The Thunderbolt Display was today added to Apple's list of vintage and obsolete products, which are part of a support document on obtaining service for an Apple product after a warranty expires. Products are considered vintage when it’s between five and seven years since Apple stopped distributing them for sale.

Apple introduced the Thunderbolt Display in 2011, but never shipped updated models. It was discontinued on June 23, 2016, with no successor to follow. Apple in 2017 debuted LG UltraFine displays made in partnership with LG, but for many years, there was no Apple-designed display available.

That changed with the release of the Pro Display XDR, which accompanied the 2019 Mac Pro. At $5,000, the Pro Display XDR is not a replacement for the more affordable $999 Thunderbolt Display, but there are rumors suggesting Apple is developing a lower-priced Apple-branded external monitor.

There is no word on when a new display might be released, and as of January 2021, work on the new display was said to be in the early stages. To cut down on pricing, the rumored display is said to feature a screen geared for consumer use without the top-tier brightness and contrast.

Now that it's on the vintage list, the Thunderbolt Display may not be eligible for repair in some states and countries. Apple previously refused to offer repairs for products on the vintage list entirely, but as of 2019, select vintage products are eligible for service. Repairs are primarily available for vintage iPhones and Macs, however, so it is not clear if the Thunderbolt Display will be eligible.

In addition to adding the Thunderbolt Display to the vintage list, Apple has also included the original iPad Air, which was first released in 2013 and discontinued in 2016, and the 27-inch Apple Cinema Display, discontinued in 2014. The 2013 11 and 13-inch MacBook Pro models were moved from the vintage list to the obsolete list, which means repairs are no longer available.

Article Link: Apple's Thunderbolt Display Classified as 'Vintage' Amid Rumors of a Replacement
I really like the one I have.
 
Vintage means it’s worth more right. Love mine still but I’m looking forward to replacing it with whatever replaces the 27” iMac.
 
I love the Thunderbolt!!! Wish Apple would make a consumer display ($500). Having a display with decent speakers, webcam and being able to control volume/brightness with OS X would be tops.

For what it's worth, the OS X volume and brightness controls work great with the LG Ultrafine 4K/5K Thunderbolt displays.

But yeah, no built-in webcam and the built-in LG speakers are average at best. Otherwise, the LG monitors are excellent. But I'm sure Apple can do better!
 
That is mostly just apple marketing honestly.
I have been using 4K at 27 and 28 inches with various scaling modes for a long while and I enjoy it fine.

It's not Apple marketing, it's what Apple customers want, and buy. It is NOT just a coincidence that all Apple laptop/desktop displays are 220 pixels per inch.

People who want to work at 160PPI and look at the monitor from a metre away, they buy a LG/Huawei/KungFu monitor or even a smaller 4K TV. To be honest, these are monitors for people who either have poor eyesight or don't wear the correct glasses/contacts. Also, some people just aren't bothered by low-res displays, they just don't notice it or don't care for whatever reason. Sophisticated Apple users want 220 DPI because it looks the best when viewed from a normal distance.
 
Like this?

28" 4:3, wireless charging and ports in base - just awesome.
This is what I wish the new iMac had looked like also.

It's actually 3:2 according to the specs.

Not sure I like the ports in the stand. Easy to access, but messy and ugly having to look at them all the time. The iMac/LG port positioning hides everything away more neatly.

Finally, the lack of a built-in webcam means it doesn't solve the main complaint with the LG Ultrafine displays.
 
If Apple would literally just take the 5K display from the iMac and sell it for $999 I would take two to put on either side of my 5K iMac. Anyone know how much the display component of the iMac costs Apple? It's a really nice LCD but I feel like it can't be that much since the 5K starts at $1799.
Well you can buy it for $400-600, so probably costs Apple like $250 ish.

 
I still have one of these that was provided by my employer (I didn't choose it), and it is ok for a glossy 27" 1440p@60Hz. The TB2 dock part isn't great, and I had problems connecting external drives through it, and had to just connect drives directly to my MacBook Pro. I wish it allow input from something other than ThunderBolt; it should have had a DisplayPort input.

It's currently taking up space unused in my WFH office because I can't use it with my PC, and I swap my monitors between Mac and PC. Even if my PC had ThunderBolt, a lot of PC's with TB3 don't work with the TB2-to-TB3 adapter.

I hope Apple doesn't do another Thunderbolt-only monitor.
 
Love my old 27 inch Thunderbolt display. I bring my 16 inch MBP into the office and hook it up via adapter. Had to replace the plug on it just recently, but otherwise it's still going strong and the USB dock on the back even works with my setup. It's gorgeous, even though it's thicc.
 
Last edited:
Writing this comment on my 27" TB display. I'm desperate to upgrade to a new monitor but I think I will wait for the larger M1 iMacs to hit the market, hopefully coming in at 30 inches. This display is still going strong and has never failed me. It baffles me why Apple left the monitor market all those years ago.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.