Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
This is odd. Why do all of the Macs on this page except the Macbook have the Lion desktop image? It probably means nothing but is interesting nonetheless.

http://store.apple.com/us/browse/campaigns/back_to_school

Like I said in my other post, I believe it's being discontinued and the MacBook Air is going to be redubbed "MacBook"- either way, when I follow that link, all of the images EXCEPT the MacBook's display a blue "?" in a box..... perhaps they have taken them down?
 
Hoping for:
storedown.jpg
 
I don't know if anyone mentioned it yet (I don't have time to read the entire thread), but DisplayPort natively supports daisy-chaining multiple monitors together, go read the spec if you don't believe me (I read it a while back, it's very technical). What the real question should be is "Why did Apple not support this a long time ago?".

To be clear, Thunderbolt is not required to daisy-chain monitors, only having DisplayPort monitors that support it and drivers that do as well. There is no reason Apple can't ship monitors that support daisy-chaining that work on pre-Thunderbolt macs (that have DisplayPort). Apple being Apple though they could of course put on this arbitrary restriction (to make you buy a new Mac), but there is no technical reason for it.

Are you telling me a MDP macbook pro can run 2 of the current 27" MDP displays? or would the current 27" MDP displays need a MDP on the actual monitor?
 
Sigh... I read through all 9 pages and I'm the only one who wishes for a smaller monitor. I guess that explains why there isn't one. But man I really wish I could buy a 21.5" apple monitor, I love the mag safe/usb part of the monitor but 27" is just too big for some work setups. And 3rd party solutions all suck currently.
 
@djsukebe

You can't run two MDP 27" monitors off of a MBP right now because the MDP doesn't have the right ports to do it. If Apple had just put two MDP or DP ports on it it would have been possible (with proper drivers supplied by Apple), but they went with their current cable design instead.
 
The prices have changed the Cinema Display. $ 999 to € 1,099 ?(Germany)? and it comes an "Oops! An error has occurred during your session. Please return to the Store Menu to continue shopping." if you click on the box in the store.

All Stores.... So you can´t currently buy a Cinema Display!
 
Are you telling me a MDP macbook pro can run 2 of the current 27" MDP displays? or would the current 27" MDP displays need a MDP on the actual monitor?

It would appear from his description that you would either need a MDP hub of some kind or for one of the displays to have a MDP on it to connect to the second monitor. If this is true, it is possible (but extremely unlikely) that these new displays may support this on MDP Macs.
 
It seems apple has removed the lion based mac images from the site again. The Dutch site doesn't feature the images either, so guess it wasn't meant to be shown yet!
 
As I believe someone else has already pointed out. It is currently impossible to buy an Apple Cinema Display. It just displays an error message as shown.
 

Attachments

  • Screen shot 2011-07-16 at 00.38.53.png
    Screen shot 2011-07-16 at 00.38.53.png
    349.1 KB · Views: 1,219
As I believe someone else has already pointed out. It is currently impossible to buy an Apple Cinema Display. It just displays an error message as shown.

Haha yeah, i'm doing a chat with a apple store online worker, he's like "I'm not sure whats wrong, hang on. Let me look into this."
 
This is a bit off-topic, but I thought I'd throw this in for those contemplating dual ext. monitors w/ a MBP. You certainly don't have to wait for new laptops, Lion or Thunderbolt.

I've been using my 2006 MBP (15", 2ghz Duo, 2GB RAM) with dual monitors for over two years now.

The ATI 1600 w/256MB in my old laptop is more than enough to run the 1400x900 native display + two 1920x1080 22" Samsung monitors. I use a Matrox DualHead2Go to connect them. The driver essentially "fools" the GPU into thinking that there is just one big 3840x1080 monitor and then the Matrox breakout box divides the signal between the two monitors. Sure, I have to deal with the bezels, but I paid less than $500 for the whole rig two years ago for the ability to have my laptop drive a a three-screen 5,443,200 pixel workspace/desktop. For sake of comparison, that's more real estate than a MBP + a 27" Cinema display, or even a MBP + a 30" Cinema. Not as cool, but just as productive and 3x less than I would have paid for a big Apple display at the time I set it up. Ergonomically I think it's even better: I prefer the panorama of three horizontally aligned monitors vs, craning my neck up and down on one huge screen. My vertebrae swivel better than they flex!

I don't use my system for gaming or anything challenging for the GPU. I use it mostly for audio production in Logic, using one external monitor to arrange/edit the samples in a timeline and the other montior for displaying a 50+ channel mixer, leaving my laptop monitor for plug-ins, email & web.

If I were a gamer or pro graphic designer I wouldn't have done it this way, but for my application the system has been dynamite. YMMV, of course.
But you are also forgetting that the apple displays come with an isight built in, a usb and other port hub, and a 49 watt sound system. Getting all that stuff separately from your displays can cost the difference between your display and the Apple Cinema Display.
 
Wait this says the dual monitors will only be supported on the 15 and 17 inch macbook pros. Why not the 13 inch? The HD3000 can handles dual monitors.
 
Haha yeah, i'm doing a chat with a apple store online worker, he's like "I'm not sure whats wrong, hang on. Let me look into this."

Good luck with that. My experience of the online chat workers is that they know nothing more than you can see on the website and it takes them half an hour to find the correct page.

Sounds like fun though. ;)
 
Wait this says the dual monitors will only be supported on the 15 and 17 inch macbook pros. Why not the 13 inch? The HD3000 can handles dual monitors.

The HD 3000 can handle dual monitors, which means 1 external display and the internal display. It will not handle (as far as I know), three displays which is what you are talking about.
 
They have to do something with the macbook. No way it can go through another major round of redesigns and not have anything done.
They could have a crippled price and feature Snow Leopard machine. The other crippled C2D machines they have had are evidence. That said, there is a need for any polycarbonate portable Apple has the inclination to offer, so why not make it i5? Or A5?

Rocketman
 
Wait this says the dual monitors will only be supported on the 15 and 17 inch macbook pros. Why not the 13 inch? The HD3000 can handles dual monitors.

The HD3000 is worthless. Apple just acknowledged it in this "MBP 15 and 17 only" restriction.

Question is, why did Apple bother putting a TB port on a machine that can't really make use of it? If it's just to plug in external drives, Firewire 800 took care of that already.
 
For the purposes of a display, what's the need for a Thuderbolt port vs a Mini DisplayPort? It's the same connector right? What's the point? Would it have any advantages at all?

It will eleviate the need for a usb cable as data and video can be transferred at the same time.
 
It will eleviate the need for a usb cable as data and video can be transferred at the same time.

Makes sense but the picture shows a MacBook Pro connected to the Cinema Display with two connections to the MacBook Pro, just like the current model.

I think the problem with the website is they posted the images showing Lion on the display a week in advance. I doubt there is a new Cinema Display at all and there will be a new MacBook as originally predicted.
 
Makes sense but the picture shows a MacBook Pro connected to the Cinema Display with two connections to the MacBook Pro, just like the current model.

I think the problem with the website is they posted the images showing Lion on the display a week in advance. I doubt there is a new Cinema Display at all and there will be a new MacBook as originally predicted.

We COULD assume that the Second ACD Display is simply mirroring the first ACD display thus the Macbook Pro would still only be running two monitors, with the second just a mirror of the first ACD
 
But you are also forgetting that the apple displays come with an isight built in, a usb and other port hub, and a 49 watt sound system. Getting all that stuff separately from your displays can cost the difference between your display and the Apple Cinema Display.

How many iSights do I need? My MBP has one. And 49w sound systems? Won't be mixing anything on those, I can assure you. I highly doubt that a usb hub, cheap speakers and a web cam would come anywhere near the cash I saved doing it the way I did.

If you wanted to talk about color accuracy, brightness, viewing angle, and related specs, you'd have a better argument regarding value. But for my specific application, the pluses far, far outweighed the minuses. Easier on my neck and far easier on my wallet.

I only mentioned it because running multiple monitors off of a MBP has been a reality for years already, albeit not as easily and cleanly implemented as the TB/MDP configs will be from now on.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.