Claim all you want but these two pharses do not exactly the same in connotation.
"start and stop"
versus
"stop and start "
...
You have produced page after page of astoundingly unconvincing text, while making it clear that you have little understanding of contract law or FTC rules and regulations. Cut your losses and just stop; you're making yourself look foolish as you argue with people who fully understand this situation, including at least on attorney.
Apple's advertisements touted a "breakthrough deal" that they entered into with AT&T to provide a limited $15 tier and an unlimited $30 tier. Those ads said that the iPad purchasers could freely change between those two specific tiers at those specific prices, or opt to go without 3G service for some period of time. This was one of the major inducements to buy the iPad. There was nothing stating that "this is a limited time offer." AT&T has a right to raise prices or change levels of service and, if Apple failed, in negotiating their "breakthrough deal," to lock in the terms and rates of the AT&T service for existing customers, then it's Apple's responsibility to make those customers whole.
The law takes the 'reasonable man' view in cases like this: What would a reasonable man expect having read the Apple advertisements? The reasonable men, including me, expected that Apple had secured that pricing and service level (in their "breakthrough deal") for the iPad and that, were there some future degradation of the terms, that those of us with earlier iPads would be grandfathered in under the old terms (free to switch between plans, and cancel service, with the ability to restart the $30 unlimited service at any time. I did believe that it was "in perpetuity" and that future changes were likely to result in lower prices and/or fewer restrictions. Because that's been the history of the broadband Internet sector. I have been paying a grandfathered rate for my unlimited business Internet broadband service and have watched speeds go up by an order of magnitude during that time. Yes, they raised speeds, did not impose any service caps, and did not change the price to existing customers.
From an ftc.gov publication:
The Federal Trade Commission Act allows the FTC to act in the interest of all consumers to prevent deceptive and unfair acts or practices. In interpreting Section 5 of the Act, the Commission has determined that a representation, omission or practice is deceptive if it is likely to:
● mislead consumers and
● affect consumers' behavior or decisions about the product or service.
Were many consumers mislead by Apple's ads? Yes.
Did it affect their decisions about whether to purchase the iPad? Yes.
I don't know why you are finding this so hard to grasp.
And lest you try to paint those who disagree with you as lacking experience, savvy, or expertise, consider the fact that major newspapers, magazines, and commercial tech bloggers have published scathing articles which closely parallel what most of us have written here.