How much is your unpredictable 3G access vary from in a month? IE do one month you have no idea you use 1 gig and the next month you have no idea you use 50 gigs?
I still don't understand how you could not develop a reasonable idea of how much data you use.
Having a "reasonable idea" is what determines whether I would have signed up for the unlimited plan or the $15 plan or no plan. If I were going on travel where I would have relied heavily on 3G, I would have signed up for the unlimited plan until I returned.
Even if you didn't why don't you want to pay for the data you use?
$29.99 is paying for the data I use! That was the price advertised by Apple as part of their "breakthrough deal" that they supposedly made with AT&T for iPad customers.
Are you just upset because they took away a plan that made data a lot cheaper for you and made it more expensive?
Not simply made it more expensive, made it economically unfeasible to use the $870 device (including tax) as I had planned given the terms they advertised.
Would you be upset if, next month, AT&T changed to a $20 plan capped at 100 kilobytes? What if they kept the 2GB cap and raised the price to $100? By your logic, AT&T should be able to do those things and you, as an iPad purchaser should have no recourse. Seriously, do you work for AT&T or Apple, because you seem to be arguing that they should be able to whatever they want, regardless of ads, statements, and promises made to you before the sale.
If so that means you don't think AT&T is allowed to raise their prices for you?
No, they are not allowed to raise the price for the service for existing iPad customers. Apple advertised that they had negotiated a "breakthrough deal" with AT&T for this two-tiered, fixed price service that would allow customers to change between limited and unlimited service and suspend service. I got my iPad on June 1. On that day, I signed up for the unlimited service. Now, explain how I can switch to the $15 tier for July and then and then return to the unlimited tier in August.
The price was to remain at $29.99 for 30 days of uncapped 3G service for existing iPad customers. That's why Apple's ads didn't have fine print that said "limited time offer" or "offer good through June 7, 2010" or "pricing subject to change" or any of the other language that is FTC-mandated in cases like these.
And here comes the almost narcissistic self-centeredness from your other posts. I *don't* care if someone gets a better deal than me. I *do* care if I have to pay for it.
No one ever asked you to pay for anyone else's service! Your bill would still have been $29.99, regardless of how much data anyone else used. Stop pretending it was some variable amount based on how much data other people used.
My compliments to your editor, then. Too bad he or she doesn't edit your posts.
My writings have been published almost word-for-word and I was even asked to write an editorial for a magazine because my letter to the editor was written so well. I have even been praised for my writings in this very thread, so stop with your childish insults and personal attacks.
I know what an analogy is, but thank you for your research.
I'm glad that you know what one is now, but I really don't consider cutting and pasting a dictionary definition to be research.
I also know what a *bad* analogy is. And you made a bad analogy. A very bad analogy. A completely idiotic analogy, in fact. The voluntary act of, say, streaming Netflix, has almost nothing to do with the involuntary act of, say, contracting ovarian cancer. Even if you can draw some sort of strained connection between an insurance risk pool and AT&T's data plan.
It was a brilliant analogy because it showed the ugly, self-centered side of your position by interposing your "logic" on a more dire circumstance. Your argument has been, all along, that it's fine for Apple/AT&T to reneg on the advertised terms and pricing as long as your bill goes down -- even by $5. You don't care how much it costs others, how it limits their use of the iPads they paid for, or how it impacts them, as long as you pay less.
Here you go again with the personal attacks because you can't make your own argument.
Your posts have been a series of personal attacks (e.g., your comment about my "editors" shown above). I've made my argument convincingly while you've resorted to demonizing those who are simply demanding the service and pricing that they were repeatedly promised in Apple's media events, web sites, and print advertisements.
I certainly do not believe that "anything" which benefits me monetarily at the expense of some other group is good. In fact, the only thing I've written about in my posts is my unwillingness to subsidize *your* (in the general sense) use of your 3G plan. It's fine with me if you stream Netflix all day on 3G. Just don't ask me to pay for it.
Stop making false claims. Repeating a false claim over and over won't make it true. Apple quoted two tiers of service: $14.99/250MB and $29.99/unlimited. Those prices were fixed. Your bill was not going to go up if I used more data one month.
Here is a helpful tool for those of you don't know how much your $29.99 plan would cost you based on data usage by others:
iPad $29.99 unlimited plan
Gigs Used by Me / Monthly Price you pay
2 $29.99
3 $29.99
4 $29.99
5 $29.99
6 $29.99
7 $29.99
8 $29.99
9 $29.99
10 $29.99
11 $29.99
12 $29.99
13 $29.99
14 $29.99
15 $29.99
16 $29.99
17 $29.99
18 $29.99
19 $29.99
20 $29.99
21 $29.99
22 $29.99
23 $29.99
24 $29.99
25 $29.99
26 $29.99
27 $29.99
28 $29.99
29 $29.99
30 $29.99
31 $29.99
32 $29.99
33 $29.99
34 $29.99
35 $29.99
36 $29.99
37 $29.99
38 $29.99
39 $29.99
40 $29.99
41 $29.99
42 $29.99
43 $29.99
44 $29.99
45 $29.99
46 $29.99
47 $29.99
48 $29.99
49 $29.99
And, seriously, you should get over the entitlement mentality and recognize that you are whining precisely because the new plan no longer benefits *you* monetarily at the expense of others.
I'm not "whining" and I am sick of your constant barrage of personal attacks and insults. The $29.99 plan probably doesn't benefit me monetarily. I would probably end up paying less if I switched to the plans now offered, bouncing between them. But it's worth $5 to me on heavy usage periods to not have to monitor my data usage and limit what I do on the net out of concerns about hitting some 2GB cap (prior to having to put another $10 into the AT&T Internet meter).
Basically, yes, when those others are people who want me to pay their iPhone/iPad bills. Again, you are basically making the argument that, somehow, I'm selfish because I don't want to pay other people's phone bills, but they are somehow *not* selfish for insisting that I do.
I'm tired of you repeating, over and over, these false claims. The plan pricing was set at $14.99 and $29.99 for the 250mb and unlimited plans respectively. It was not a variable amount based on how much data some other person moved.
I find it interesting how you seem to keep trying to bolster your argument with extrinsic factors, such as having being published in national magazines or being otherwise somehow demonstrably smart. I'm sure you know that the argument from authority is a logical fallacy, but you still insist on doing it.
I'm so sorry. When you insulted my intelligence and writing skills, I certainly had no right to defend myself. Please accept my apologies.
By the way, "argument from authority" refers to a claim that something must be true because the person making the claim has expertise in that subject area, not that the person making the claim is intelligent or a published author.
Feel free to provide better numbers; these are AT&T's smartphone numbers.
I don't have better numbers, but that doesn't mean that I can't recognize flawed statistical analysis.
Although I'm not really sure why iPhones and iPads should be treated differently from other smartphones (maybe there is a reason); they are all using the same bandwidth.
Cox Communications provides data, voice, and television services. It would ludicrous to take the data usage of 98 telephone customers and two cable television customers and say that only 2% of the customers are using 90% of the bandwidth, so they are "data hogs."
(I may be wrong, but I don't think that AT&T offers a Nokia smartphone).
Just one of several examples they have offered in recent years.
Dude, you are wrong. The provisions of the plan that let you start and stop in the future ARE NOT AVAILABLE. Therefore as of tonight, they are committing false advertising by stating that it IS available.
Unless of course, you think that being able to start and stop a MONTHLY plan as much as you want over the next DAY is valid.
You can't make it any clearer than that, yet I am betting that they will continue to maintain their indefensible positions. I think that we're wasting our time arguing with them. They don't care about business ethics, truth in advertising, fairness, or even legality. It's all about $4.99/month savings to them.