Wow, so an extra $19 a month for 9 mos ($175 early term fee divided by 9 months) isn't enough to get you into a new iPhone.
Sounds worth it to me, although my current contract end-date is October 2009 (15 months or an extra $11.66 pro-rated)
Apple users are used to paying more for a higher grade of hardware & the vertical integration that comes with it. I'm not understanding what the hubub is about. Especially since next time the $175 early term fee declines by $5 for every month of the contract that passes by - ergo, if a new iPhone comes in July 2009 you're only on the hook for $115
For some people (myself included) its not about the price. Its losing your number. Whenever you cancel your contract, you lose your number (unless you already switched it to a NEW carrier). By canceling your contract and signing a new one, you lose your number. ATT doest allow you to transfer your number from one contract to another when canceling. Ive tried. For me, its too much of a hassle to get a new number out to everyone that is used to my current number. You have to think about that when you cancel your service just for a new phone.
Perhaps, but we'll end up with twice as many problems with many more companies and this time the government will be one of them.
At least you'll have your iPhone while you're walking to work.
*sigh* Guess we'll all have to WAIT to find out the DETAILS from AT&T regarding what the pricing will be for CURRENT AT&T customers who do NOT have an iPhone.
Everything else looks pretty clear to me.
Don't know why folks sold their 1st gen iPhones in the first place - how's life without your iPhone been so far?
I got my iPhone day one, 2 year contract, voice $39.95 and data 20 bucks, including 200 SMS texts. EDGE coverage is fine where I live, and I'm on Wi-Fi a lot anyway. The next gen iPhone (3G) doesn't appeal to me enough to want to ditch what I have, pay 2 or 300 bucks for, nor up my data plan from 20 bucks to 30 bucks + 5 bucks more for those formally "free" 200 SMS texts. I'd be out of pocket 300 bucks plus 15 bucks more a month for 2 years. Why bother?
iPhone 2.0 update will rock, and it's free. So I'm not missing out on anything except 3G and GPS - I have GPS in the car, so I don't care.
Sure, I'll be FORCED into this switch next year at this time when my current, cheaper contract expires - but by then, Apple would have come out with iPhone 3G ver.2, and I would expect it would be WAY worth the wait.
This 3G phone isn't so much iPhone ver. 2 - rather, it's iPhone 3G ver. 1.0 Think about iPhone 3G ver. 2.0 - THAT'S what I'd rather wait for.
(And I know all this only speaks to current iPhone owners who have been in their contracts for a while already - which is more than a few of us, I'd surmise.)
Lol. I can't get an iphone until April 2009. Bloody hell with 2-year contracts.
That would suck, but I doubt that is the case. You will neeed to fulfil your financial obligations of your old contract (pay termination fee) but I am sure they will manage to let you keep your number.
I bought an iPhone on day 1 (6-29-07), and my contract expires in April 09 also. Why do we have to wait???![]()
People are complaining on all sides of this thing. I want to pinpoint why, exactly, people are upset over the new price situation.
People aren't stupid. People understand how phone pricing schemes work, with subsidizing, fancy T&Cs, upgrade eligibility, contracts, etc. They are not complaining because the new iPhone should, a priori, be different.
Instead, they are complaining because the iPhone has, since its inception, gone out of its way to be different. I'm not a fanboy to say that the iPhone is different than other phones. Just look at every piece of Apple's bloody marketing! Since the 1st gen iPhone was announced, Apple has stressed its uniqueness, both in terms of software, hardware, and, crucially, delivery to the consumer. With the 1st gen phone, we didn't have to deal with subsidies, in-store activation requirements, etc. It was very simple: buy the iPhone like any other Apple product, iPod, iMac, etc.. You just need to buy cell phone service to use it, and you can do that in the comfort of your home.
Now the 3G comes along. I completely understand that the new pricing structure is reasonable, and matches every other phone. But when Apple's web site (and Steve) announced "half the price" without saying ANYTHING about the new pricing/upgrade/subsidy situation, people's very reasonable assumption was that things would work as before. Apple is a unique company, they do things differently, etc. The fact that it's still being sold in Apple Stores on its own reiterates that. When you walk into the Apple Store, do you expect to need upgrade eligible to buy the new iPod or iMac, or the first iPhone? It's not unreasonable, it's just incredibly misleading.
In other words, as I understand it, people aren't upset that Apple is selling the new phone just like every other phone. People are upset because Apple does so while STILL hiding under the pretension of uniqueness. It would have been very easy to Steve (or Apple's website!) to mention that although the price is lower, it is now part of the usual pricing/upgrade/subsidy rules. That would have been clear. They didn't say that. Because they want people to think they're still doing it differently. But they're not. That's annoying.
People are complaining on all sides of this thing. I want to pinpoint why, exactly, people are upset over the new price situation.
People aren't stupid. People understand how phone pricing schemes work, with subsidizing, fancy T&Cs, upgrade eligibility, contracts, etc. They are not complaining because the new iPhone should, a priori, be different.
Instead, they are complaining because the iPhone has, since its inception, gone out of its way to be different. I'm not a fanboy to say that the iPhone is different than other phones. Just look at every piece of Apple's bloody marketing! Since the 1st gen iPhone was announced, Apple has stressed its uniqueness, both in terms of software, hardware, and, crucially, delivery to the consumer. With the 1st gen phone, we didn't have to deal with subsidies, in-store activation requirements, etc. It was very simple: buy the iPhone like any other Apple product, iPod, iMac, etc.. You just need to buy cell phone service to use it, and you can do that in the comfort of your home.
Now the 3G comes along. I completely understand that the new pricing structure is reasonable, and matches every other phone. But when Apple's web site (and Steve) announced "half the price" without saying ANYTHING about the new pricing/upgrade/subsidy situation, people's very reasonable assumption was that things would work as before. Apple is a unique company, they do things differently, etc. The fact that it's still being sold in Apple Stores on its own reiterates that. When you walk into the Apple Store, do you expect to need upgrade eligible to buy the new iPod or iMac, or the first iPhone? It's not unreasonable, it's just incredibly misleading.
In other words, as I understand it, people aren't upset that Apple is selling the new phone just like every other phone. People are upset because Apple does so while STILL hiding under the pretension of uniqueness. It would have been very easy to Steve (or Apple's website!) to mention that although the price is lower, it is now part of the usual pricing/upgrade/subsidy rules. That would have been clear. They didn't say that. Because they want people to think they're still doing it differently. But they're not. That's annoying.
After having followed this post I must say that I am amazed that many people do not seem understand the simple (and fair) principles behind this.
So many people should not, not be able to understand thus my conclusion is that these people DO NOT WANT to understand. If you're one of them, move on to the next post, but it you truly WANT TO UNDERSTAND, stay with me for a while and I will explain.
Basic concepts we need to be able to understand and distinguish between:
Now the deal (no one in the US will get a worse deal than this, this deal is for EVERYONE):
- Phone: In this case the new or old iPhone or another phone such as a Samsung phone or Motorola
- Contract: An agreement with your provider, which might be AT&T, t-mobile or other. If you have a current contract, you also need to make a distinction between your old and new contract.
If you sign up for a new AT&T 2-year contract, you will be allowed to buy the iPhone for $199.
Let's be clear about that this deal is for EVERYONE including "non-customers", "other provider customers" and "AT&T customers".
Everyone that signs up for a new AT&T 2-year contract will be allowed to buy the iPhone for $199.
Buying the iPhone will give you a new phone (for $199) and a new contract but it will not change that you have other prior agreements in your life including maybe:
Even if you would like to get out of these agrements, sadly buying an iPhone will not solve your problems. However, if you are an existing AT&T customer, AT&T might give you a deal that no one else gets.
- Car loans
- Unfavorable subprime loans
- Subscriptions on magazines that you have signed up for a fixed term (maybe they gave you something if you promised to stay with them for a year)
- Prior committments with other phone providers (maybe they gave you something if you promised to stay with them for 2 years)
- Prior committments with AT&T (maybe they gave you something if you promised to stay with them for 2 years)
The sweet deal for existing AT&T customers:
If you are a good AT&T customer, AT&T will relieve you from one of your prior contracts namely the "old AT&T contract". You will keep what they gave you (maybe a free/cheap phone) without you having to keep your agreements. We call this the "free upgrade".
This deal is sadly not valid for other committments so
Conclusion:
- You can't keep your t-mobile-subsidized phone while AT&T releases you from your t-mobile contract
- You can't keep your house while AT&T pays off your debts
- Everyone that signs up for a new AT&T 2-year contract will be allowed to buy the iPhone for $199.
- This does not make AT&T bad (if they did not trick one to get into a contract which seems to be not the case)
- This does not make Apple bad
- Everyone is eligebale to get a subsidized phone with the same agreement
- People will need to figure out what to do with their old contracts if AT&T will not offer them a free way out
ps. When SJ in the keynote said that everyone would get to buy the iPhone for $199 he was referring to the global release of the iPhone. Even so, it still holds true since:
Everyone that signs up for a new AT&T 2-year contract will be allowed to buy the iPhone for $199.
Where are you getting your information? If what you say is true, there wouldn't be 16 pages of complaints on this thread. The AT&T spokesman clearly stated that there would be a different price (i.e. NOT 199/299) for existing AT&T customers that weren't "upgrade eligible". That is why people on this thread are upset. If you have some different information that is from a reliable source (NOT some AT&T rep on the phone or in a store) then I'd love to believe you.
Yes, there would be.Where are you getting your information? If what you say is true, there wouldn't be 16 pages of complaints on this thread.
Sure. You can cancel your current contract and pay the ETF. Presumably, the "different price" you speak of will allow you to avoid cancelling your outstanding obligations, and thus keep your current plan (which might not be offered any more, and which you might prefer to the 39.99 plan that is the default selection).The AT&T spokesman clearly stated that there would be a different price (i.e. NOT 199/299) for existing AT&T customers that weren't "upgrade eligible". That is why people on this thread are upset.
I'll say it again. ATT DOES NOT ALLOW CUSTOMERS WHO CURRENTLY HAVE A CONTRACT TO CANCEL THEIR CURRENT ONE (EVEN WHEN PAYING THE EARLY TERMINATION FEE) AND SENDING THEIR NUMBER TO A NEW ATT PLAN.
I would imagine they do that to avoid people doing this very thing to take advantage of a deal. I have spoken to several reps and store managers and they all said the same thing.
that's your answer right there. Numerous statements released by AT&T have mentioned that current iPhone owners are going to be allowed to upgrade at those prices. It's the current customer, non-iPhone owners that MIGHT be getting screwed.Currently I am an iphone costumer
that's your answer right there. Numerous statements released by AT&T have mentioned that current iPhone owners are going to be allowed to upgrade at those prices. It's the current customer, non-iPhone owners that MIGHT be getting screwed.
AFAIK each line.Does anyone know if AT&T's ETF applies to ALL the lines on an account? I have a family plan with 2 lines, and I'm wondering if the ETF applies to EACH of those lines or if I'd just have to pay the $175 once.
Well something weird to report....
When the fist official news about the3g iphone came out, I called up ATT and asked them would I be eligible for the 199/299 deal. The rep checked it out and said no, since you are not eligible for an upgrade until 04-09. Today when I went to check out my upgrade status it changed This line is eligible for equipment discount pricing when you sign up for a 2-year service agreement. You can also take advantage of our no-commitment pricing option. I have no idea why this changed, my only explanation is allowing all current iphone costumers to upgrade to the 3g iphone at the 199-299 price.
Currently I am an iphone costumer and do plan on purchasing the 3g on July 11.
In regard to AT&T's specialized credit qualification system as posted by BestBuy, among other iPhone articles:
"Customer has had a standard calling plan plus data services costing $99 a month or more, and who has been in contract (and not upgraded) in the last 12 months. "
This line, specifically, seems rather confusing and convoluted. I switched to AT&T in March in light of the much-rumored upcoming iPhone 3g release. I bought a refurb Blackberry with the intention of buying the iPhone in a few months. Also, my plan totaled ~$115 for the months of Mar, Apr, and May.. however, I downgraded my plan a bit in June so that it now totals ~$95/month.
Thus, I've had a plan costing $99+ a month or more. I have not upgraded since I've been in my contract. And I've been in the contract w/ this $99+ price point (at some point) in the last 12 months.
The wording seems very unusual.. I haven't been in a contract FOR the last 12 months, but I have been in a contract @ $99+ IN the last 12 months... and I've HAD a plan costing $99+ w/o upgrading.
Am I eligible..... ?![]()
You bought the phone right out, right? If so, it doesn't matter. You didn't get a subsidy so you'll get it now.