so noone knows who supplies at&t's network hardware?
where is this 18 billion going to? besides buyouts. i know PWAV supplies sprint & vzw..
Qualcomm
so noone knows who supplies at&t's network hardware?
where is this 18 billion going to? besides buyouts. i know PWAV supplies sprint & vzw..
How will its not the question here. rdowns has neatly sumed up what I was about to say. iPhone users are more demanding.
Simple, beautiful interface everyone wants to use. Just like data before the iPhone. No one used it. Today, not many people with iPhones can go a day or two without having to use the web or check email.
I HATE Verizon. Locked up the ass firmware with the same damn menu on every phone they sell. No sim support and I can't have multiple phones BS. Dammit I hate them.![]()
You still fail to prove your point. The MMS experience will not be any better on the iPhone then other smartphones. I still highly doubt the MMS traffic will be greater then other smartphones. Only time will prove who is right. And quoting articles about how iPhone customers use 10x more data (which is currently mostly internet data) is not proving they will use 10x more MMS traffic.
You fail...LOL.
So yeah, you fail.
You still fail to understand my point.
You still fail to understand my point.
What you are saying is what everyone said about the mobile internet on the iPhone. No one will use it. And yet 2 years later we have a 300% traffic increase. AT&T is preparing for that. If that doesn't happen, then AT&T has solified its network. If it does happen, then AT&T can handle it without a problem because they prepared.
Now, if problems do arise, then I plan to complain because AT&T gave the "we are preparing excuse".
So Apple and AT&T have nothing "locked up the ass" on the iPhone?
Tethering?
Come on AT&T?!?!?! What's the problem!!!!
When you market, what is basically an apology that you suck, that can't be good. Sorry, not good enough. You provide a service, it better deliver or else you're done. AT&T has consistently proven to me through HORRIBLE signal experience that they don't know whats going on. To pander to their customers with a 'poor us, but we'll do better next time' attitude is just not good enough..
What ? Why are you trying to compare it to what people said about mobile internet. Mobile Internet was a very poor experience a few years ago. That is why people didn't use it. Almost all phones MMS. MMS is already very popular. Unlike what mobile internet was a few years ago. I'm not saying MMS will not be popular on the iPhone too. But the iPhone does not MMS any better then other phones. Unlike the Internet experience. And I'm saying MMS will not be anymore popular then other phones.
I'm even tired of reading this. It's not better. No one is saying the iPhone has better MMS. They're saying that once the iPhone can MMS the *****'s gonna hit the roof with THAT MUCH MORE DATA. Some 18 million people will be able to send pics.
Nothing is blocked on my Verizon Windows phone. So I guess Verizon Smartphones, the current ones anyway, are more open than the iPhone. People seem to have a hard time believing that.By comparison, less so than Verizon. All phone company's suck, finding the one that sucks the least is the trick.
You still fail to prove your point. The MMS experience will not be any better on the iPhone then other smartphones. I still highly doubt the MMS traffic will much greater then other smartphones. Only time will prove who is right. And quoting articles about how iPhone customers use 10x more data (which is currently mostly internet data) is not proving they will use 10x more MMS data. Do iPhone customers SMS more then other smartphone users ? I highly doubt it.