And there's a reason some are leaving T-Mobile as well.
I made the jump from AT&T to T-Mobile.
Worst decision ever. Minimal (2G/3G) coverage in rural areas, spotty coverage on the highway between AZ and California (I travel to LA and SD a lot), and poor building penetration. Band 12 is still not deployed in most of AZ and my 6 Plus doesn't support it anyway.
Yeah their LTE was fast, when you could get a good signal. I had the Cell Spot in my house, without it, I barely got 4G.
WiFi calling dropped more calls than I could count during hand off.
So after a little over a year with T-Mobile, I went back to AT&T.
AT&T's LTE is not as fast as T-Mobile's, but I can get an LTE signal pretty much everywhere I go. Even on I-10 between PHX and LA.
Thanks, very good info.
I just want to add T-mo LTE not as fast as it was this summer. 100 percent agree with LTE 12 deployment, it is fully deployed only on JL's twitter
T-mo has a tiny 5mHz of low band than Att has 10MHz. In addition Att has GSM 850 which will be converted since January 2017 and a strong HSDPA 4G.
I expect Att will spend as much as they need and to get another 10-20 MHz national wide 600 MHz. T-mobile is so inconsitent with the info on how much they are going to spend on 600 MHz. It was 10B, then they don't need 10B, they need 2-3, now is 9B. DT is even going to sell Neverland T-mo to get some money to buy some more 600MHz.
Binge ON is another marketing trick, to de-congest their (official info 8 percent of t-mo sites are congested) network.
The only thing t-mo has is a great international roaming.
ATT, PLEASE low your international roaming!!!!!!!!