Yes, he did. I'm sure he intended to transform the phone market just like Apple did with the music market. With the phone market, Apple wanted to emphasize the hardware and minimize the service (i.e. carriers). I think AT&T went a long with it figuring they earn a lot of subscribers out of the deal. While the iPhone was certainly innovative and will change the market on that front. I don't think they are moving as many units as Apple had hoped.![]()
Didn't Jobs introduce the iPhone 1.0 by telling everyone it was a new model for cell phone sales? No subsidy/no lock in and so forth?
iPhones are still a very small segment of the mobile phone industry and I think Apple was forced to give in on quite a few points to try to maintain traction in the market. I think most other markets that Apple is trying to grow into have learned a lot from how Apple dominated the music market and are much more cautious. It seems the carriers have won this round - standard activation practices, standard plans and rates, no portion of the service fees going to Apple. AT&T was definitely able to exert much more influence in this round of their deal.
My guess would be that Apple is shifting gears in the mobile phone market, no longer focusing on hardware profits, as they have always done in the computer market and extended into the music market. This time they seem to be focusing on creating the largest install/user-base that they can with the iPhone and they seem to be leveraging the new AppStore to provide additional revenue - 30% of all iPhone software sales isn't all that bad, especially if you can get a huge user-base on the iPhone. They want to own the platform - sounds reminiscent of a company Apple fans typically dislike.