Most professional software is broken by macOS updates, and it’s common practice to not only avoid betas, but wait well beyond release for the software manufacturer to issue a green light. Like Abelton, serato, OBX, etc.Not sure when this arrived, but if it was present in betas... Did these Audiovisual artists not try out betas?
We already get the Station ID plastered all over the place. I find that more intrusive than this.This year for Christmas I will ask Santa to make a luminous orange dot appear on your televisions every time you watch a movie.
Let me know when it gets delivered. ?
You act like everyone is trying the betas. I certainly would never trust a beta in a production environment. I doubt the number of Audiovisual artists that also actively try beta software is a very very small number.Not sure when this arrived, but if it was present in betas... Did these Audiovisual artists not try out betas?
"In their infinite wisdom, Apple has..."
A great conversation starter, to insult the company whose help you need in order to get the matter resolved...
I thought you knew by now that if it has not personally happened to a MR member then it's a made up story because they have not personally experienced it.I am baffled that we have 5 pages consisting of comments from people that don't understand that this is a real problem for other peple.
Talk about narrow minded. No wonder we don't have peace on earth.![]()
Ok, I can agree with that. Maybe in fullscreen mode on external display (when external display is acting as 2nd monitor) the dot can go away. But when external display is mirroring internal/main display, then orange dot needs to stay.The dot is fine in the menu bar… but in fullscreen mode on an external display it's terrible. Apple should make a way to hide the dot in fullscreen.
Did you read the article?
“In our particular case, this means that this orange dot appears on the stage output, which is totally unacceptable for anyone using macOS as a professional video tool that sends video output to a video projector”
It's not either/or. If Apple purports to be a professional tool it must allow professionals to control it at a deeper level than a consumer product. They need only create an acceptable (and secure) process where pros can override this feature.My security vs. your aesthetics. let me think....
Isadora and other live-performance apps use audio input to create visual feedback for immersive theater and other live performance events. There are two problems with this situation: One, it injects a bright orange dot on the image or video that developers and artists have carefully crafted; Two, and more troubling is it shows Apple injecting a forced security feature without considering how it may impact some pro users. As a company that lost a chunk of creators in the past decade by neglecting that channel and some serious hardware/software missteps, this is not how a "professional partner" acts.Wow, the amount of hostility in this thread is tangible :-(. I read this thread seeing if someone would explain why this is a big deal? Nobody here, not even the original article explains *why* this is a problem? Folks say its terrible and wrong, and should be changed, but nobody explains *why*? It's like you are expected to just know, and if you don't you are an idiot and several people dislike or reply with abusive comments? I am NOT saying it isn't a problem, I just don't understand why it is a problem. Is this dot part of the video stream, meaning that if you are recording the screen, it shows up on the recorded video too? I would understand why that would be an issue, as it would be similar to your camera capturing interface elements when you take a picture. Nobody wants to see that, and that is problem that everyone should be upset about. If it is just overlaid over the top of the video stream, how is it any different than a camcorder or video camera having a "record" light lit when it is recording? To me, that would be an indicator of a "live" performance.
So you wouldn't mind an orange dot always appearing on your expensive TV?I don’t get it. Can someone please explain how this negatively impacts their live performance?
A lot of the time it isn’t your machine. It’s the venue’s. You just plug in an external drive with your data on it.You don't have to try it in a live environment. If it is that darned important, you have a second string computer that you try these things out on - including connecting to big screens.
When I was doing (much lower-level) presentations, I'd try them out on multiple machines. And I'd avoid updates before an important event.
People who have very strict color branding of their professional video/entertainment/recording appearance would make their own work seem less professional and serious. This is not good. And I will explain why.That’s what I’m trying hard to understand. Why is it “totally unacceptable”?
This is similar to spending $10k on new HD TV with a dead pixel on it. Except instead of 1 dead pixel, it's a cluster of pixels that are colored orange so they are always visible unless it happens to be displaying something orange at the top. And now you're inviting people over to watch content and all they can notice is that stupid orange dot because it's so out of place and annoying. Oh and on top of all that, you are charging them for privilege of being annoyed by an orange dot. Do you see a problem yet?What exactly are they complaining about? A tiny orange dot in the upper right side of the screen? Right… right… because when people watch a live performance, their focus is on some coloured dot in a corner and not the actual performance! I get it…!
For people still not understanding, imagine this:View attachment 1932399