Why not both? Leave this behavior as the default, but allow it to be turned off on external monitors by those of us that need it to be able to do our jobs.My security vs. your aesthetics. let me think....
Why not both? Leave this behavior as the default, but allow it to be turned off on external monitors by those of us that need it to be able to do our jobs.My security vs. your aesthetics. let me think....
It doesn’t need to be able to be fully disabled. The dot can remain on any screen with a menu bar. Most projectionists and the like turn the menu bar off on external displays.So just an observation but if Apple does provide a way for the dot to be disabled that to me means that functionality could be used to disable the dot when it shouldn't be. So I guess the question here really is why would it be acceptable for my privacy to suffer for you? It seems like you are willing to say that is ok.
There should be some solution but it should not involve an easy to use disable feature.
This exactly.For anyone here who doesn’t get it, this is a huge deal.
I have a live-streaming video studio. Last week I finished a show for an association that involved online presenters and advertisements for several large corporations. Each of them paid a LOT of money for their ads to be seen by the audience and if there was an orange dot overlaid on their ad or the live segment of their CEO answering questions, I’d have been in big trouble.
(Big trouble = I lose that job next year)
My studio has 3 permanent Macs installed in it and there are 2 others that sometimes get plugged in. All of their leases are ending soon and if there’s not an answer to this by then I will be forced to switch to PC.
I do not want to do that but my business will absolutely suffer next year if my clients start seeing weird dots on their online productions.
For everyone with a stupid joke comment here - cool - but Apple’s going to lose a lot of high-end clients if they don’t fix this.
This all over.Good lord. Inability to read, inability to comprehend, inability to see any needs other than their own. This item is a perfect example of why large sections of the general public should never be asked their opinion, or be allowed onto the internet in general.
So just an observation but if Apple does provide a way for the dot to be disabled that to me means that functionality could be used to disable the dot when it shouldn't be. So I guess the question here really is why would it be acceptable for my privacy to suffer for you? It seems like you are willing to say that is ok.
There should be some solution but it should not involve an easy to use disable feature.
That'd work brilliantly... until then people think there's a load of dead pixels for the missing bit... ?Really?
Exactly where would you apply the electric tape?
On the projector lens?
Great solution, projector owner will be delighted.
Another genius idea could be to cut a hole in the screen at the exact orange-dot position, right?
Does it need to be on both screens ? Just on the primary display is enoughMy security vs. your aesthetics. let me think....
If you are getting paid for Visuals or backdrops at an event YES, it's a pretty MASSIVE deal.Is it really though? Like let's be completely honest here, this isn't as big an issue as apps using your mic without telling you.
Thats a Workaround for some setup's, not a solution.There is a hardware solution to this software problem: If your projection system supports it (and I think most do) adjusting the overscan could at least mask the problem, in a pinch.
Let's say you're at a concert and your favorite band is playing. There are 3 LED walls that show psychedelic graphics that move in sync to the music. That LED wall is driven by a Mac and software that responds to the audio in real time by using the microphone. Well now there's an orange dot in each LED wall's corner because the software uses the microphone.I don’t get it. Can someone please explain how this negatively impacts their live performance?
There is a hardware solution to this software problem: If your projection system supports it (and I think most do) adjusting the overscan could at least mask the problem, in a pinch.
... Thats a Workaround for some setup's, not a solution.
I bet most of them didn’t. If someone’s work/livelihood depends on a particular setup—like the rig for a live performance—they’re probably some of the LEAST likely people to try “beta” anything on their production machines. Too risky.Not sure when this arrived, but if it was present in betas... Did these Audiovisual artists not try out betas?
Is it really though? Like let's be completely honest here, this isn't as big an issue as apps using your mic without telling you.
If the dot is not presented on an external screen used for live shows by default you're affected exactly zero.My security vs. your aesthetics. let me think....
Professional artists need a clean interface which means no small orange dot. I hope Apple could accommodate their needs.Pretty small and innocuous, I can’t believe that is a huge issue with anyone. I hid the menu bar and could barely see it on the top right. Very small on a 4k display, as in really small and not very bright at all
Well there is a provide feedback option, if it is a real issue to people, there is probably a solution
See: Today at 19:00I understand that this dot is a problem for some users.
But the discussion about ‚just make it configurable in a secure way‘ sounds like US Senators that want ‚just make a secure system that only the FBI can snoop on‘…
If a user can switch it off, so can a bad actor (no pun intended on the performance AV people). Kinda defeats the purpose…
I wasn‘t referring to your kind of solution, but to user-selectability. Yours might work, I agree.
Good thing NO ONE is asking for it to be turned off COMPLETELY. The ask is simply, have it hidden when the menu bar is hidden on EXTERNAL displays. It can remain visible on the main display.I understand that this dot is a problem for some users.
But the discussion about ‚just make it configurable in a secure way‘ sounds like US Senators that want ‚just make a secure system that only the FBI can snoop on‘…
If a user can switch it off, so can a bad actor (no pun intended on the performance AV people). Kinda defeats the purpose…
Because nobody in their right minds plays games on macOS.I haven't seen anyone complaining about this in relation to fullscreen multiplayer games. Isn't there a fullscreen mode which would disable it?
That should only be an issue if you were only using an external screen with the menu turned off, but that would be a difficult way to use a Mac. I doubt Apple would turn it off on the menu.So just an observation but if Apple does provide a way for the dot to be disabled that to me means that functionality could be used to disable the dot when it shouldn't be. So I guess the question here really is why would it be acceptable for my privacy to suffer for you? It seems like you are willing to say that is ok.
There should be some solution but it should not involve an easy to use disable feature.
I wasn'tIn no way does your comment actually conflict with my original statement... unless of course you're just trying to be a grammar nazi.
They are probably testing it still.Given the number of kernel panics I’ve had on Monterey (mostly the fault of VirtualBox admittedly) I’m surprised someone doing a live performance or critical presentation would update to the latest release so soon. I’d think it would be better to use something like an Apple TV for the video presentation aspects and route the sound to a mixing desk where a microphone can be mixed in. That way you’re not reliant on an OS that will reboot the whole machine if it crashes badly enough.
Good lord. Inability to read, inability to comprehend, inability to see any needs other than their own. This item is a perfect example of why large sections of the general public should never be asked their opinion, or be allowed onto the internet in general.