That is why you adhere to title/action safe areas. All relevant footage will be more towards the center of the content.
Respectfully, that's not correct.
Title safe/action safe come from the days of things like CRT screens where there was a real risk of the edges of the image being cropped off by the viewers display. Or 16:9 content being shown on legacy 4:3 displays.
These days, they're much less relevent.
Telling other video professionals that they should be using title safe/action safe because you, as a video professional adhere to them, is not cool.
There are a great many instances in the video production world where this is irrelevant, and live visuals (IMAG, VJing, art installations, digital signage, outdoor advertising is now of them. Why? Firstly because the content is often designed to be edge-to-edge to fill the entire available space, and secondly because in most instances with that sort of work the screen size is known )often a bespoke size) and content is custom created specifically for that display... so title safe/action safe are not important.
Implying that adhering to title safe/action safe is the solution here, is to also imply that those working in these environments will always have to crop and zoom-in their content... or have black borders around their content. Both of which are, frankly, laughable ideas.