Is this really this much of a big deal? I don't have an iPad so I don't know if it would bother me, but is it so much of a deal that you don't want to play on it or that you would rather have not bought the iPad in the first place? If the answer is yes then I think that you guys are all wimps and don't have anything better to do than make fun of the iPad (by the way if you don't want your iPad I'll be glad to take it off your hands), but if the answer is no, then why are you even reading this in the first place?
I think given how costly these devices are it's not unreasonable to demand utmost quality. It's obviously up to you whether you care, though. I ended up finding the other (what I would call) screen defects even more annoying than bleed.
Is this really this much of a big deal? I don't have an iPad so I don't know if it would bother me, but is it so much of a deal that you don't want to play on it or that you would rather have not bought the iPad in the first place? If the answer is yes then I think that you guys are all wimps and don't have anything better to do than make fun of the iPad (by the way if you don't want your iPad I'll be glad to take it off your hands), but if the answer is no, then why are you even reading this in the first place?
It's certainly NOT a big deal and the light bleed on 90 % of all iPads can NEVER be seen in normal usage (unless you specifically look for it). It's a bit annoying when a thread like this has made one aware of it, though. But again: you have to look for it to find it. Or use weird brightness settings in the dark.
Again, there are different cases. Some of the ones posting in the previous pages are probably bordering what I call the OCD-cases (no offense meant, really, I can be like that myself) in that they can't accept even the slightest bleed. Getting ANY LCD with this technology without any bleed is quite difficult, I would say.
The more normal case, and mine is like that, is that the bleed is visible in the dark at maybe >40 % brightness, and clearly visible at > 60 %. This is more annoying, but again, personally I am about 95 % confident that I would NEVER have noticed it, had I not read these threads. Of course it depends on how you use it. If you often watch movies, with black bars at the top and bottom, in the dark and on a somewhat bright screen, then you would notice it. EVEN in that case it can still be argued that it shouldn't really matter, but oh well. Personally, I don't watch movies on it (I have a perfectly fine 46" TV for that(which by the way also has significant light bleeding)).
Hm, sometimes I don't quite understand what people mean with the iPads being that costly. I am from Denmark, but a quick currency conversion tells me that you can get one for about 700$? That's NOT expensive. As someone else have mentioned, don't use the most expensive iPad model as an example because what you pay for is 3G and extra storage. The most expensive one has the exact same screen as the cheapest one.
So bottom line: there IS an issue, but it has become an obsession for some to find a perfect iPad, and in normal usage, by FAR the most people would NEVER notice any problems.
You're free to have different standards, but don't confuse those standards as a categorical imperative.
Is there any methodology to the serial list? I don't understand the point if both good and bad screens are coming from the same factory and same week. I mean what does that that tell us? Seems like the desire of the tech to align and assemble the unit properly is the only thing that matters...
You can see it at various edges around the screen just like mine. Uneven lighting around the edges. I'm telling you, some backlight bleeding is the nature of the beast.
I still maintain that the "you can't see it in normal usage" argument is largely fallacious and fundamentally misunderstands the point. The market price of this device is set with a tacit assumption that it is defect-free. Backlight bleed is not an advertised feature and on the most generous of possible interpretations it would at best be considered an 'acceptable' deviation from design parameters by Apple. As a consumer, you aren't obligated to accept such deviations as there is no differential pricing in place and you have a reasonable expectation that, should you so desire, the product matches the tacitly assumed form and function.
Thus, the bickering about whether or not it is visible or would be reasonably noticeable during ordinary use is your value judgment masquerading as a universal premise of rational consumer choice. You're free to have different standards, but don't confuse those standards as a categorical imperative. I probably wouldn't have even bothered to say more about this, but I honestly think people who hassle consumers for demanding quality don't help anyone in the end as they aren't going to make people who have defective products feel better about them, and they help lower accountability on companies that ship defective products. If you don't care about defects, that's fine, but don't bother with frivolous claims that other people are being unreasonable.
As a side note, the cost of a 64GB 3G is $829, which if you factor in tax in many locales is around $890-930 total. It's largely irrelevant that the screen is the same as the lower models. You pay a total, integrated price and you're still out ~$900 on a defective product.
You can see it at various edges around the screen just like mine. Uneven lighting around the edges. I'm telling you, some backlight bleeding is the nature of the beast.
If you expect LCD technology on any level to be 'perfect', then your expectations are not reasonable. Virtually every LCD panel has some imperfection to it. Manufacturers would be out of business if they only allowed the 'perfect' ones through, as they are few and far between. You regard it as a flaw, but if every LCD device has this 'flaw' to a certain degree, then it is no longer considered a flaw but an inherent characteristic of the panel. You either accept it or go buy something else, but to sit around, exchange a couple hundred times only to be back where you were initially, or worse, it ridiculous.
I agree--some people on here need to just return their iPads. They have gotten trapped in this vicious cycle and are never going to be happy.
Interesting, I got a bleed / defect free one and I'm very happy with it. 5 returns.
DN6FQ bad bleed, dead pixel, this is my 4th iPad and that's it I'm done.
Its off back for a refund.
![]()
I am curious how bad yours is and where ours stands across the same model # although having a hard time understanding the compiled list, were there any of this model that were marked OK?
Lastly how can you check for dead pixels and can you please post a picture?
I know mine has some bleed along the left edge but I'd say it's decent and am thinking of keeping it. I will make a follow up post with some pics for your guys judgement.
Interesting, I got a bleed / defect free one and I'm very happy with it. 5 returns.