Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
1. My only Apple computer is a late 2012 Mac Mini which I like very much.
2. All my other computers run Windows 8.1, XP, Ubuntu. 3 laptops, 1 tablet, 1 desktop, apart from the tablet, they can all have their drives replaced. The tablet has an microSD card which can be replaced, but the OS drive is built in and not replacable. I bought the tablet for almost 200 euros a couple of years ago. It still works though I don't use it daily.

The way I see it, the problem with going for all soldered, not replacable, having to rely to the company for even the smallest of service, component replacing, is longevity most of all.
Everything breaks down. Given enough usage and/or time.

If I buy a laptop that I can't replace the drive or memory, two components which from my experience have a pretty damn good chance of needing replacement after time, then what I am buying is a computer which has an expiration date. Not based on if I can use it online any more (say 15 years from now), or use the latest software, but simply the ram can go bad, or the drive stop working. Everything else can be fine, but that machine is now useless. Not even good as a museum piece. That is a waste of technology. That is a waste of resources. Not very green.

Apple (in this case) is not going to provide repairs for them 15+ years from now. More likely not even 10 years from now. You bought this computer and you want to use it, if nothing else, for sentimental reasons. But the drive/RAM is bust. Nothing you can do about it. Any other computer, even decades from when it was new, you can still find and replace these two very important (and prone to failure) components. Not with these new laptops.

For me this is unacceptable. Not because I might want to upgrade them, but because I might (will?) need to replace ram/drive and it won't be possible.

I do hope Apple reverses this strategy in the future, at least for the desktop systems. I refuse to use Windows 10, I want to use macOS for my future needs, but, I will not buy a computer which has such a (for me) serious design flaw.

Well you are boned then because OS X is only available in a reliable way on Apple products. So you either accept apples design philosophy and use the OS you love or you don't. That's your choice it's not going to change and neither is apples design philosophy, I've got a fair idea of whose going to win this impasse...
 
Well you are boned then because OS X is only available in a reliable way on Apple products. So you either accept apples design philosophy and use the OS you love or you don't. That's your choice it's not going to change and neither is apples design philosophy, I've got a fair idea of whose going to win this impasse...
You do? ok. That makes one of us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: protoxx
There are still some like the "bezel-less" Dell XPS 15 that has ram slots/ssd slots, etc., with Skylake quad cores. Thinkpads/Elitebooks are all 100% repairable, down to the screens etc, those are more "pro" in my book, but I get what you are saying.

The high end consumer show models like MBP and Surface Book are less and less repairable every year.
[doublepost=1479513187][/doublepost]

So spend over $3000 on a machine that you need another machine to backup....that's genius right there. Glad I don't hate money as much as some people.


In my business we have 35K to 100K machines we bring backups for on site and run them redundant ....just depends on the importance of not being able to accomplish the job when needed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Queen6
I strongly doubt that any future Apple laptops will allow users to open them up and start replacing pieces. It is just not in the company's DNA. My original 1984 Mac has been upgraded by a dealer to get a "programmer switch" (restart button, 10 cent piece of plastic). Apple deliberately made the case difficult to open so users would not mess with things.
 
I strongly doubt that any future Apple laptops will allow users to open them up and start replacing pieces. It is just not in the company's DNA. My original 1984 Mac has been upgraded by a dealer to get a "programmer switch" (restart button, 10 cent piece of plastic). Apple deliberately made the case difficult to open so users would not mess with things.
My performa had a slew of plastic clips in addition to a bunch of screws. I had to replace the internal speaker one time.
 
The last thing you need is to have a drive fail in the middle of a job and have to fork over a pile of cash just to get rolling again. If a drive fails, you need to be able to swap a drive and be up and running again 20 minutes later.
That would require you to also be a skilled sysadmin (there are far more things that go wrong with computers!) ;) A real pro makes sure he has quick access to one and a backup machine and focuses on his business instead.

They're great prosumer machines, but a true pro machine would allow drives to be swapped, RAM to be upgraded, batteries to be replaced and so on.
And a true pro wouldn't complain like this nor would the swappableness of the RAM and drive be his primary worry. No, a true pro wouldn't buy this thing because it doesn't come with a Xeon processor, ECC memory, enterprise SSD (with SLC preferably) and of course an ISV certified GPU. None of these are in the notebooks these so called "pros" here are requesting or buying. The real question is: are they really pro because they sure as hell aren't requesting pro hardware?! </sarcasm>

As stated before, there are many different kinds of professionals with most focusing on their business and not on stuff they have little to no knowledge about. Actual professionals outsource those kind of jobs because it is cheaper (in money and in time). As is custom in businesses they go to an IT company and sign a support/service contract with them. These kind of contracts allow them to be up & running in no time again no matter what the problem is. This is a very different approach than yours. Yours is approaching a very specific issue, professionals approach it differently where the issue doesn't matter only the fact that the machine doesn't work as it should. This is how most IT companies keep alive.

So you are saying we should buy a back up computer in case our $3000 to $4000 laptop takes a dive? Professionally speaking that is...
No, I'm saying that you need to have access to a backup machine; doesn't have to be a secondary version of your brand spanking new one.

What about having 2 identical computers that can ALSO swap parts between each other? Professionals have known to keep a backup machine since the dawn of time, the only difference Apple makes is to make each individual machine less serviceable by the user.
You are overestimating the knowledge of most users/professionals here not to mention that you are overestimating the amount of time they are willing to spent on these kind of issues. Most professionals would very much like to focus on what they do best and let others do what they do best so they'll outsource these things. You are talking about the enthusiast that have a bit of IT knowledge.
 
That is fair but bashing a great product because of your own preferences seems a little pointless especially when you have this unusually balanced opinion.

The "bashing", not particularly just from me but also the others, is a reaction as a result of Apple taking away choices. Apple is in a way forcing an established user base who grew into the ecosphere to switch, out of necessity. Limiting the customer's options is as much as limiting the company's reach (as far as the "pro" monika infers...)

You are overestimating the knowledge of most users/professionals here not to mention that you are overestimating the amount of time they are willing to spent on these kind of issues. Most professionals would very much like to focus on what they do best and let others do what they do best so they'll outsource these things. You are talking about the enthusiast that have a bit of IT knowledge.

To the average user, the 2012 pre-retina unibody MBP at its time was just as sleek in its form as the current gen MBP, but it didn’t keep the machine from having user serviceable SATA drives and SODIMM RAMs. The point here is again, choice (or lack thereof).

On related note, I think all these 2016 batch of SSD that is soldered on board will suffer in longevity as you can never upgrade / fix a broken drive cheaply after the 3rd Apple Care year.
 
You don't have to explain that to me, I perfectly understand it. The problem here is you not understanding your own point, it is utterly and completely moot. You can keep repeating it until the end of days but that is not going to do anything about the fact that this only applies to a minority and it still requires technical knowledge, skill, tools and willingness to do it. All of those things the average user and professional do NOT have; they turn to us IT professionals. The point here is that your point only applies to less than 10% of the users, the remaining 90% doesn't care or sees it as a negative.

There is little point in joining the discussion if you can't grasp such a simple concept. You may disagree but try to comprehend what someone is saying. Again, I understand your point but you completely fail to understand that I'm saying it is a completely moot point.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ixxx69
You don't have to explain that to me, I perfectly understand it. The problem here is you not understanding your own point, it is utterly and completely moot. You can keep repeating it until the end of days but that is not going to do anything about the fact that this only applies to a minority and it still requires technical knowledge, skill, tools and willingness to do it. All of those things the average user and professional do NOT have; they turn to use IT professionals. The point here is that your point only applies to less than 10% of the users, the remaining 90% doesn't care or sees it as a negative.

There is little point in joining the discussion if you can't grasp such a simple concept. You may disagree but try to comprehend what someone is saying. Again, I understand your point but you completely fail to understand that I'm saying it is a completely moot point.

Hey Dyn, where did you get all of your accurate stats of 10% vs 90%? Just curious if there's a good source somewhere, or reference.

Also if you are talking to the 10% of users you claim, I think you are missing the point that they don't care they are the 10%, they still want what they want :).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nathe
That would require you to also be a skilled sysadmin (there are far more things that go wrong with computers!) ;) A real pro makes sure he has quick access to one and a backup machine and focuses on his business instead.


And a true pro wouldn't complain like this nor would the swappableness of the RAM and drive be his primary worry. No, a true pro wouldn't buy this thing because it doesn't come with a Xeon processor, ECC memory, enterprise SSD (with SLC preferably) and of course an ISV certified GPU. None of these are in the notebooks these so called "pros" here are requesting or buying. The real question is: are they really pro because they sure as hell aren't requesting pro hardware?! </sarcasm>

As stated before, there are many different kinds of professionals with most focusing on their business and not on stuff they have little to no knowledge about. Actual professionals outsource those kind of jobs because it is cheaper (in money and in time). As is custom in businesses they go to an IT company and sign a support/service contract with them. These kind of contracts allow them to be up & running in no time again no matter what the problem is. This is a very different approach than yours. Yours is approaching a very specific issue, professionals approach it differently where the issue doesn't matter only the fact that the machine doesn't work as it should. This is how most IT companies keep alive.


No, I'm saying that you need to have access to a backup machine; doesn't have to be a secondary version of your brand spanking new one.


You are overestimating the knowledge of most users/professionals here not to mention that you are overestimating the amount of time they are willing to spent on these kind of issues. Most professionals would very much like to focus on what they do best and let others do what they do best so they'll outsource these things. You are talking about the enthusiast that have a bit of IT knowledge.

I'd spend some time replying to all of this, but I feel like you're living in some kind of alternate reality. Nobody I know who uses their Macs to make money behaves the way you insist that they would if they were real pros.
 
Hey Dyn, where did you get all of your accurate stats of 10% vs 90%? Just curious if there's a good source somewhere, or reference.
In this case my big fat thumb as it is merely an example.

Also if you are talking to the 10% of users you claim, I think you are missing the point that they don't care they are the 10%, they still want what they want :).
I'm not missing that, those guys are extremely vocal and also extremely unreasonable about it as can be seen in this topic and the like.

I'd spend some time replying to all of this, but I feel like you're living in some kind of alternate reality. Nobody I know who uses their Macs to make money behaves the way you insist that they would if they were real pros.
That's because you simply didn't understand what I wrote. There is such a thing called a workstation and those are equipped with Xeon proc and ECC memory and they are heavily used by businesses/pros. The reason for that is to reduce errors; they have a very high reliability. This is one of the things an actual pro who has high demands would demand. The point was that nobody here on the forums has done so which is a big hint that one needs to question if they really are who they say and/or think they are....or if they are simply being unrealistic and unreasonable here.

There are many different kinds of pros who don't have any issue with using ordinary consumer hardware such as a Mac for their professional work. The difference here is that they are not complaining about the MBP not being pro or some piece of hardware not being pro and so on. IRL I haven't seen anyone with a Mac behaving the way people do here to be honest and then we are talking people doing different kinds of calculations, modelling and running simulations on something like a MBA.

How many people here have asked whether the GPU in the 15" is ISV certified (something that is required by 3D CAD software like Solidworks)? I haven't seen any pro asking questions like that here.

TL;DR: the following topic title pretty much sums it up: The whining is getting ridiculous now.
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.