Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Maybe a proper analogy would be someone wearing a beard or mustache, but only on one side so that it's an incomplete, mismatched look. Or, keeping with yours, it's not a mainstream beard or mustache -- it's one of those really long curly Boris staches. Or a Devil's pointy beard, but in all white.

It's a real visual problem. AirPods look like giant earrings or cyborg stems -- unnatural either way. Plus they are white so they stick out and scream "look at me." Most headphones blend in or compliment -- even big lime green Beats. Not a fan of those but they work with some people. AirPods don't look good on anyone. It's truly function over form on this one.

Honestly, if AirPods were made so that the stem went up rather than down it would blend in and wouldn't be an issue. Don't know if they would be as technically great that way but wouldn't look so goofy. And they do look goofy -- on me and everyone else who wears them. I recognize this, some AirPod owners are just delusional like those who think they look hip in their Ed Hardy T-shirt. I try to avoid the mirror when I'm wearing my AirPods so I don't feel self conscience. It's a really tussle between my vanity and comfort/convenience.
[doublepost=1495025329][/doublepost]

Well, the wireless part. The most important part of any headphone/ear bud should be sound. If AirPods sounded crappy the W1 chip would be a moot feature.

The stem pointing up? did you give that even the tiniest thought before you came up with that idea? The stem is the microphone.
 
AirPod comparisons are moot for me; Apples ear pieces don't isolate the outside world at all and as a result, I need to keep the volume at dangerous levels to hear anything while commuting.

These promise 20-30db insulation, so let's see. Looks promising but I wanna see reviews first.
 
AirPod comparisons are moot for me; Apples ear pieces don't isolate the outside world at all and as a result, I need to keep the volume at dangerous levels to hear anything while commuting.

These promise 20-30db insulation, so let's see. Looks promising but I wanna see reviews first.

Airpod volumes don't even approach anything remotely dangerous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: otternonsense
And people say Apple stuff is overpriced. They're just starting to catch up to the AirPods for more than twice the price? Hah!
 
The features of AirPods are nice, but I am one of the many who can't stand the fit of Apple's headphones. They start hurting my ears after about ten minutes. Never had that experience with any other brands.

Airpods don't even seal the ears let alone hurting. Unless you have tiny ear I have a hard time believing your claim. And yes I do have Airpods, they never hurt my ears, I can hardly notice I'm wearing earphones with Airpods.
 
Airpod volumes don't even approach anything remotely dangerous.

Comments from people that don't even own Airpods are hilarious. You're right 100% volume is not even that loud, this was one of my issues with Airpods they're not loud enough. Even in quiet room I listen with 70% volume.
 
I'm in the market for these.
I could never wear Apple's since they insistently fall out... it's extremely annoying. Also, Bragi look much better than the 2 white sticks popping out of ones ear.
 
Last edited:
Comments from people that don't even own Airpods are hilarious. You're right 100% volume is not even that loud, this was one of my issues with Airpods they're not loud enough. Even in quiet room I listen with 70% volume.

I own Airpods. As the majority of people have said the audio quality doesn't exceed the normal ones Apple bundles in. If you think they are dangerous sound wise you would risk an electric shock making toast.
 
Can you expand on that? I thought music was tailored to the artist's ears.

I would venture a guess that the headphones would be tailored to every individuals own hearing thresholds and various frequencies all the way up to 14 or 16k. With that said, Bill Austin, the head of Starkey is a first class *******.
 
Too expensive. The Airpods are half the price.
with half the features.
"The Dash Pro tailored by Starkey, with personally-tailored fitting and more nuanced audio-boosting features at 5,000 audiologists throughout the United States and Canada. The Dash Pro tailored by Starkey is set to benefit users by allowing them to use "Fourth Platform" contextual computing interfaces that enhance their ability to interpret audio while enabling UI interactions through The Dash's motion sensing."

What? What does any of those sentences mean?

If you ever have paid for custom in-ear-monitors, you go to an audiologist to get fitted. They take impressions of your ears and build the earpiece to conform to your ear canal. It provides a more comfortable, optimal seal. I had this done for ear plugs because I'm at a lot of loud events.

The only features that appeal to me personally with the pro are the moulded fit and that it's waterproof. If this things had a W1 it'd be a much more compelling product. I use too many devices to want to deal with the inconvenience of having to re-pair every time I switch.

It's too expensive for me and I'm waiting for Bluetooth 5 to become ubiquotous before I spring for another set of bluetooth earbuds. The waterproof and custom ear moulding sounds awesome, but these or going to be obsolete really soon.
 
significant to mention the Bragi Dash Pro sales skit initially posted above says some sort of custom ear molding available to making the ear buds exactly customized to the user's ear canal.

In the past I had a wired custom ear bud pair and they were always very comfortable, stayed in the ear and better than expected sound.

Apple's W1 chip and lower costing are significant but if the Bragi custom molding process works this alone could sway me away form apple.
 
If Apple could improve one thing it would be a better seal between the AirPods and your ears. I couldn't believe how obnoxiously loud my gym was when I wore AirPods for the first time instead of my $16 bluetooth earbuds. The latter fit into the ear canal and in that regard were superior. Looks like Bragi has that going for them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlueTide
Woot, Dash Pro tailored by Starkey, once you had custom fit you never go back, shame they are not available in the UK
 
Please enlighten me. What does "more nuanced audio-boosting features at 5,000 audiologists throughout the United States and Canada" mean?

The rest, I get what they are "trying" to say, but the buzzwords they shoehorn in are annoying at best and misleading at worst.

I agree, the sentence is very poorly written.
 
You do know that the Dash came first, though, right? You do know they come with more functions, right?
Yes I do know that. Do you know what the word phrase "catching up" means? Just because you're first doesn't mean you're the best. Apple usually waits to enter markets until they have a solution that is better. Bragi couldn't even get the basics right. With crappy wireless connection and poor battery life, they're just now catching up to what the AirPods already do for less than half the price.

As for the features of the device itself, I see two big problems: Nobody is going to be slinging their head around trying to control their music. People will like like they have tourettes or are stroking out. That's just dumb and expensive. Second, they are baking in these processors for speech recognition and translation processing. That's also dumb and expensive. Why? Because your earbuds are always going to be connected to a smart device. With their system, you need two users of Bragi Dash Pro earbuds for it to work. What are the chances of that ever happening randomly when you're visiting a foreign country and need to ask someone directions, order food, etc? It's stupid. Leave all the translation processing on the smart device. That's where it belongs and it doesn't add any cost to the headphones. That's fine if they want to develop tech for real-time translations. But this is about as forward-thinking as building a computer into a mouse to use with your computer. Earbuds don't need to be this intelligent for them to be really useful. There is zero chance this takes off. Set a reminder for a few years and we'll chat then.
 
The stem pointing up? did you give that even the tiniest thought before you came up with that idea? The stem is the microphone.

Did you give what I wrote the tiniest thought before you thought to press "reply" to castigate me?

In my post, after I proffered the idea I wrote: "Don't know if they would be as technically great that way but wouldn't look so goofy."

So, yes, I understand the technical part. I was putting out the idea that they would have looked better if Apple engineered them to go up rather than down. And also in my post I noted I own another pair of BT buds, the Freedom F5. Those have a mic that is even father away from the mouth than if the AirPod stem pointed up.
 
I'm lost. What do you mean?
Maybe you missed my link. It was to a great set of wired headphones, which for obvious reasons will not work with iPhone 7/7+ and most likely any future iPhones. This is a different link, but the thing is, that "old" 3.5 mm sound port has been around a long time, and the sound technology behind it has matured. You get fine padded earphones ventilated for comfort, sound isolation, and with the right sound interface - like multi-channel DACs - an unbeatable music machine which requires no batteries to recharge, other than the device to which the earphones are attached. Another example:

http://www.techradar.com/reviews/audio-visual/hi-fi-and-audio/headphones/oppo-pm-3-1299128/review
 
Yes I do know that. Do you know what the word phrase "catching up" means? Just because you're first doesn't mean you're the best. Apple usually waits to enter markets until they have a solution that is better. Bragi couldn't even get the basics right. With crappy wireless connection and poor battery life, they're just now catching up to what the AirPods already do for less than half the price.

As for the features of the device itself, I see two big problems: Nobody is going to be slinging their head around trying to control their music. People will like like they have tourettes or are stroking out. That's just dumb and expensive. Second, they are baking in these processors for speech recognition and translation processing. That's also dumb and expensive. Why? Because your earbuds are always going to be connected to a smart device. With their system, you need two users of Bragi Dash Pro earbuds for it to work. What are the chances of that ever happening randomly when you're visiting a foreign country and need to ask someone directions, order food, etc? It's stupid. Leave all the translation processing on the smart device. That's where it belongs and it doesn't add any cost to the headphones. That's fine if they want to develop tech for real-time translations. But this is about as forward-thinking as building a computer into a mouse to use with your computer. Earbuds don't need to be this intelligent for them to be really useful. There is zero chance this takes off. Set a reminder for a few years and we'll chat then.

I know what the term "catching up" means. Yet, I do not think the AirPods are anywhere close to being superior to the Dash. Granted, the original Dash may have had Bluetooth issues, but they fixed that with the Headphone and this new Dash version.

Features...so the AirPods are waterproof for swimming? So the AirPods work standalone with internal memory? So the AirPods have a better fit (I wouldn't wanna jump up and down with the AirPods, I can't even make my Apple EarPods stay in may ears while normal walking)? So you can control the AirPods/your phone without Siri?

I'm not talking about head gestures, I'm talking about actual things that actually improve the primary application of the Dash: workout.

The Bragi Headphone, which essentially has the same functionality as the AirPods minus the W1 chip, have the same price.

You just sound like a fanboy, sorry.
 
The chip (W1) has sailed.

Apple has already matched the portability with design, battery life and AAC sound quality.

Being able to offer custom ear molds is a pretty big deal and something Apple can't offer. People don't really care what chip is in their device so long as it works.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nnoble and Ankaa
Being able to offer custom ear molds is a pretty big deal and something Apple can't offer. People don't really care what chip is in their device so long as it works.

How many people actually bother to get their ears molded in order to customise their earphones?
 
I would venture a guess that the headphones would be tailored to every individuals own hearing thresholds and various frequencies all the way up to 14 or 16k. With that said, Bill Austin, the head of Starkey is a first class *******.

So... I wouldn't hear it the way the artist intended, but rather the way that someone else thinks the artists heard it?
 
So... I wouldn't hear it the way the artist intended, but rather the way that someone else thinks the artists heard it?

Well to be honest unless your hearing is identical to that of the artist, you never will. In this case the headphones are personalized to your hearing levels.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.