Completely unimpressed with this video capability, but I have been using a Sony RX100 most recently. The first thing I noticed was the venue with nothing but windows to let in light. It as probably chosen for this reason.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Burberry Releases Full Fashion Show Shot with iPhone 5s
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
One of the quickest ways to spot a professional is the lack of effects... and those that are used are so subtle most people miss them. The (over) use of effects is the mark of a novice... and if you notice it at all, the effect has failed.
Not a photographer, are you?
Overall, at youtube resolution, this doesn't look bad. But this is nothing that really could not be done with any other camera phone. At a usable resolution, and if you compared side-by-side with a real camera, the differences would be astronomical.
Part of the reason this looks so good was the time spent lighting and controlling the cameras/phones. Note the sky-lights are gelled so you don't get high lights blowing out. Don't expect these results at home unless you know what you are doing, and spend a few bucks. Oh, and use a tripod.
Good luck. Looks like you'll need it.
http://9to5mac.com/2013/09/17/iphon...nch-as-apple-preps-app-to-check-availability/
Jony Ive and the Chief Creative Officer of Burberry got together and decided to do it. No other reason than there was good timing and they are mates.
Why not?
I would be interested in what they used for camera stabilization, but otherwise, yeah, it looks like a smartphone. Until I see the 1080P version, perhaps as a free download from the iTunes Store, I don't find a need to comment on the quality.
I thought this video of the fashion show did a better job showing the abilities of the iPhone 5S camera because it had had more varied content (including close ups) and revealed some of the equipment used for tracking shots.
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=a-1mP-2vzqg
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=a-1mP-2vzqg
But surly this video is to promote the iPhone 5S video features too?
A bit of slo-mo would have been welcome.
this was really a testament to youtube's mediocre quality more than the iPhone 5s' good quality. you can see detail both inside and outside (ceiling windows) that would be blown out by many phone cams. you can also see it dynamically adjusting shutter speed and exposure fairly smoothly.
i downloaded the video and watched it at 720p in quicktime. youtube heavily compresses everything so we're never seeing anything close to what the clean original looked like. in the end, it's hard to tell if the artifacting was from camera or compression.
Soon. Soon enough my iPhone will be able to be more powerful than a $10,000 4k camera. sooooonnnnn
If you guys really want to see what this phone can do checkout this shorter video http://youtu.be/a-1mP-2vzqg that slowmo video just looks so good, well done apple.
Edit: Nevermind it was pasted already
Edit: Nevermind it was pasted already
should be more of it!The analogy still holds. As has been pointed out above, most of the audience for a show like Burberry's consists of industry professionals -- buyers from department stores, buyers from NYC/Chicago/LA boutiques, magazine editors, designers of peripheral accessories, etc. Their interest is in using Burberry's products to further their own businesses. Burberry's interest is in promoting their platform over those of other, competing design houses. Both WWDC and fashion shows have plenty of spectators -- members of the public who are quite interested in what they are doing -- but both types of shows are designed primarily to further their respective product lines and associated businesses.
Vettel works with Infiniti (performance advisor?). I wouldn't call this a Smart Car, but it's also far from a F1 car: http://www.caranddriver.com/news/infiniti-fx-sebastian-vettel-version-news
The link to the Burberry video that I posted (above) had some slow motion in it.
It was a much better example to show off the abilities of the iPhone 5S camera imo.
Well I'm an Apple fan and I definitely hope they do well. I've had and Android phone and I NEVER want to experience that again.
Apple might not come out with exactly what I want all the time, but in my opinion they are a better brand.
Promos like this don't sell me on the phone, but maybe I'm not the intended target.
Apple might not come out with exactly what I want all the time, but in my opinion they are a better brand.
Promos like this don't sell me on the phone, but maybe I'm not the intended target.
either way that's a better video.
You can see lots of post here though (not a criticism).
The "jello effect" is due to the shutter, more specifically the rolling shutter these cameras use. Most modern cameras use this type of shutter and it is an issue on all of them, though not nearly as much.
He was talking about the rolling shutter issues having to do with video.
At $500+ I would say that it is an expensive full HD camcorder.
It is expected and they should have known - and not shot anything that would have illustrated that effect. It's called "rolling shutter." In a film camera, images get shot onto individual pieces of film, 24-30 per second and you perceive motion. In the digital world, the sensor is read one direction, row by row of pixels, left to right, let's say, so it's kind of like vertical blinds. If whatever you are filming is moving quickly, or you are moving too quickly, the "read" of the sensor is too slow to keep up with the motion, and you see the result as something warped or angled. Try taking a photo in your car as you drive by a nearby light pole and you'll see it. There are also numerous really cool pictures taking advantage of this effect of things like airplane propellers.
As for the quality of the 5s camera, I don't think this proves anything. These photos and video could have been taken by any small camera or phone. There's really nothing particularly outstanding in these shots. I'm anxious for some good iPhone photographers to get their hands on the 5s and take it for a spin. But I still don't think it's going to be *quite* as earth-shattering as it was made out to be. The lens is a quarter stop better, the sensor is 15% bigger. These don't add up to massive upgrades, save for the bigger pixels on that sensor. 120fps is neat, though.
Peace said:
Shaun said:
kobalap said:
I never really understood why runway shows seem to offend some people. I see comments like that all the time whenever fashion related news is posted on a non-fashion board.firstapple said:
