Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
So what IS your threshold for holding Apple accountable? Worker beatings? Child labor? Slave labor? Or could Apple's suppliers be doing ALL of these, and you STILL wouldn't want Apple to intervene?
I don't know about that guy, but I'm waiting for YOU to intervene. You obviously support these conditions, you buy electronics.
 
So true. And these Chinese factory jobs are apparently in high demand. This issue will never be satisfied for these watchdog groups until Apple is somehow irrelevant and then they'll move on from Apple's carcass and target someone else.



So they DO NOT care.
All they want is publicity?

Shame.
 
I can

"Apple has continually failed to compel supplier factories to conform to Apple’s code of conduct and local labor laws before giving these suppliers Apple production orders"

I just don't see how people can try and make it seem like it's Apple's fault... Surely this is the fault of the factory and the responsibility of the contracted company and the local government to rectify this.

Certainly Apple can try and make a show that they're trying to do the right thing, but trying to blame it on Apple... That Apple is failing... It seems wrong.

I can blame Apple for lots, but not really for this one.

Let's say you go to pick up dry cleaning once a week and as you enter a bell rings and the owner's dog barks. The owner then kicks the dog. How many time will you go there before looking for a new dry cleaner?
 
Ever see the lines when Foxconn or one of the other large manufacturers in China puts the word out that they're hiring? Thousands upon thousands of people stand in line for days to get one of these horrible jobs. Because it's still better than the alternative.

If they don't like the working conditions, they should stop working. Foxconn would be forced to raise prices to Apple, and Apple to us. Problem solved. But it's not gonna happen, because ultimately somebody is willing to work under these conditions, some company is willing to let them, and we're almost all NOT willing to pay more for our gadgets.

What bothers me is that this storyline has the word Apple in it simply to gain page views. All the sites that report on this like to blame Apple, or at least slant the article to make it appear that Apple actually has some control over the problem. These companies make things for Samsung, Dell, Moto, HP, and virtually every other high-tech hardware company - yet you never see their names in the article.
 
Are you expecting an apology from all of the people suffering from corporate wage suppression?

No one can be suppressed, because no one else can think for you, which means no one else can vibrate for you, which means no one else can create reality for you. It's all you. Only you.
 
So what IS your threshold for holding Apple accountable? Worker beatings? Child labor? Slave labor? Or could Apple's suppliers be doing ALL of these, and you STILL wouldn't want Apple to intervene?

I'm not saying Apple can't intervene, however this article writes as if it's Apples fault. Is not the point of contracting out work so that you have to do less? It seems lately that Apple gets targeted as if they were there running the factories themselves.
 
Apple... the richest company in the world thanks to modern slavery :rolleyes:

This is NOT the reason they are the richest company in the world, if indeed they actually are...:rolleyes:

REALITY CHECK: Hundreds of companies are blamed for this, yet there's always one common denominator--China. Where do you think the REAL problem is?

I know it's not just China. Like Solent Green, it's people.

Somebody, somewhere is trying to make a buck at the expense of those of us who do the work. It's been that way for 1000's of years, and I don't foresee any changes any time soon--they don't care about your opinion, or mine.
 
I'm not saying Apple can't intervene, however this article writes as if it's Apples fault. Is not the point of contracting out work so that you have to do less? It seems lately that Apple gets targeted as if they were there running the factories themselves.

Of course Apple will intervene as they do not want bad press like that.

Some of the posters here need to take a business 101 class in a hurry.

Money drives everything and people who say they'd pay more if xyz happened are full of it. Nobody does.

As for contract work controls when an audit is imminent everybody knows and they put everything in the best shape possible.

Once the auditors leave it's business as usual.

Putting Western morals and viewpoints onto the Chinese way of doing business
doesn't work.

The article is trying to get Apple to do something that the Chinese government should take care of.

If they were making stuff for Walmart it would be the same and why don't they ever name the other brands and products made in the same factories?

Apple's name just pulls best!
 
I am sick of these reports. Really. I am not saying it is a good thing these people are being abused. But the fact is that Apple is just a buyer to these suppliers. They have an agreement to provide a product to apple, just as if we are buying from apple.

Might as well accuse all of us apple product owners for the violations. It's the local government's job to force these corporations to uphold a standard (which the Chinese government don't even have one) or allow the set up a union; just like how all emerging civilization does it over time. Don't blame it on the consumer. I am pretty sure 90%+ corps / factories in china is doing something that is not to our standard.

Like the US economy down turn. I have seen people being treated SOOOO horribly at their place of employment, why aren't anything being done? or at least, why aren't the media saying more about it? Instead...ooooohhhh apple bought from a supplier who violates the laborer in China which Apple have no jurisdiction over besides paying more and more money to these factories which will continue to do the same thing.
 
Let's say you go to pick up dry cleaning once a week and as you enter a bell rings and the owner's dog barks. The owner then kicks the dog. How many time will you go there before looking for a new dry cleaner?

When Apple is visiting though, I'm sure everything looks rather nice. The dog would even get the day off. Once Apple reps are gone... business as usual.

Plus your example doesn't really compare well, maybe where you live not many dry cleaners kick their dogs... Here in China pretty much all factories are like this. Apple can do a lot, but it can't change a culture.

To really prevent this Apple would have to open their own factories with their own supervisors.
 
I (personally) really don't care anymore.

Exactly. Because you can't get sick enough to make sick people get better, and you can't get poor enough to make poor people get rich. You can't vibrate for anyone else.
 
Of course Apple will intervene as they do not want bad press like that.

Some of the posters here need to take a business 101 class in a hurry.

Money drives everything and people who say they'd pay more if xyz happened are full of it. Nobody does.

As for contract work controls when an audit is imminent everybody knows and they put everything in the best shape possible.

Once the auditors leave it's business as usual.

Putting Western morals and viewpoints onto the Chinese way of doing business
doesn't work.

The article is trying to get Apple to do something that the Chinese government should take care of.

If they were making stuff for Walmart it would be the same and why don't they ever name the other brands and products made in the same factories?

Apple's name just pulls best!

Exactly.

And all the factories here are like this, if you're not, you're not competitive. Apple can't change an entire culture.

The only real way Apple could prevent it is to open and supervise their own factories here.
 
"Apple has continually failed to compel supplier factories to conform to Apple’s code of conduct and local labor laws before giving these suppliers Apple production orders"

I just don't see how people can try and make it seem like it's Apple's fault... Surely this is the fault of the factory and the responsibility of the contracted company and the local government to rectify this.

Certainly Apple can try and make a show that they're trying to do the right thing, but trying to blame it on Apple... That Apple is failing... It seems wrong.

I can blame Apple for lots, but not really for this one.

True, it seems like of like "blame by association".

On the other hand, Apple - in the past at least - has been very aggressive in their dealings with partners. It may be (we're not privy to the details) that Jabil Circuit's margins are being squeezed so they have to in turn put greater pressure on employees.

All I can say is - China does seem to have very work & workplace ethics to many Western nations; can't say I would like to live & work there.
 
I'm sure Apple would prefer that this not happen. Either way if this catches steam it could taint the iPhone 5C launch.
 
Does this supplier do work for companies other than Apple? You won't know if you read this report. Interesting how its always Apple alone inheriting responsibility for all the misdeeds of their suppliers.

I'm sure Apple will continue working on this issue, but making it Apple's sole responsibility to reform a countries work culture may be asking a bit much.
 
Let's say you go to pick up dry cleaning once a week and as you enter a bell rings and the owner's dog barks. The owner then kicks the dog. How many time will you go there before looking for a new dry cleaner?

Using your example, you should require your dry cleaner to allow you to camp out in his store to monitor his behavior or you should at least make frequent unannounced visits to inspect his operation. This is the same standard you are apparently expecting Apple to take. I'm sure if Apple witnessed something (or had credible complaints) they would take action, but to expect a customer to take responsibility for anything the vendor does is completely ridiculous.

In fact, by those standards, you should immediately refuse to purchase any more Apple products since customers are responsible for the actions of their vendors.

While these watchdog groups likely have good intentions, there is a huge political element here, and they are not above using Apple (as in knowingly painting them as negligent, regardless of the facts) to further their goals. They know their ability to directly coerce the Chinese authorities is minimal due to the political & cultural environment, so they aim to use companies like Apple (with the potential threat of pulling production) to do what the Chinese government will not. I appreciate the original intent of improving worker conditions, but the means being used is, itself, unethical. Apple probably does more than any other large corporation in these areas, yet these groups and the press routinely rewards that by blaming them even more.
 
There is that too. China has a tight hold in a large rare earth metal cache and if you want the metals the components have to be made there as the raw materials are illegal to export. It's part of how China pulled in jobs back in the day and how they keep them there

Rare earths are not rare.

Rare earths are very expensive to turn into usable products if you try to avoid massive damage to the environment, and cheap if you don't care about the pollution. The western countries could easily produce all the rare earth metals they want if they didn't care about the massive pollution involved.
 
Why is this Apple's problem? Shouldn't this be an issue for the Chinese government? Don't THEY regulate and enforce labor laws? I don't see the Chinese government holding the mfgs responsible for violating the laws. Heck, China probably doesn't even have labor laws pertaining to minimum wage, overtime limitations, meal period break requirements, etc. If they do, the laws are probably minimal and rarely enforced as can be seen by the widespread violations that go unpunished.
 
Amazing how these labor groups throw out allegations and immediately everyone takes them for the gospel truth without even giving Apple the opportunity to respond. Also curious that this "news" comes out a few days before a major product launch. :rolleyes:

For everyone complaining in this thread, if it bothers you so much quit buying Apple products. Limit your purchase to companies that don't employee Chinese labor and pay workers what you consider a fair wage.
 
It is interesting to me that Apple has "failed to compel supplier factories to conform to Apple's code of conduct and local labor laws before giving these suppliers Apple production orders." So why not find a supplier who does? Is there actually a shortage of suppliers?

All the suppliers are doing the same thing. This is a China law and working person issue, not an Apple issue.
 
On the other hand, Apple - in the past at least - has been very aggressive in their dealings with partners. It may be (we're not privy to the details) that Jabil Circuit's margins are being squeezed so they have to in turn put greater pressure on employees.

Apple has cancelled contracts with companies found to intentionally hire underage workers. Apple has forced companies to return these workers back to school and pay for their education. Apple has forced companies to repay money to workers who paid exorbitant fees to agencies. And if there is evidence that workers working on Apple products were not paid for overtime (which, if you look carefully, they are not claiming), you can be sure they will be paid.


Strange is, Microsoft, DELL, etc … get RICH the same way, but noOne did care about those exploited Asians.

Remember the news: "Workers at Apple factory threaten suicide". Why? "They are afraid of losing their jobs because Microsoft is cutting Xbox production".
 
When Apple is visiting though, I'm sure everything looks rather nice. The dog would even get the day off. Once Apple reps are gone... business as usual.

Plus your example doesn't really compare well, maybe where you live not many dry cleaners kick their dogs... Here in China pretty much all factories are like this. Apple can do a lot, but it can't change a culture.

To really prevent this Apple would have to open their own factories with their own supervisors.

This. I was in a Jabil factory in Huangpu earlier this year. Honestly I thought things looked pretty good, clean, workers seemed reasonably pleased with their work.

A few times I was able to freely travel between buildings, which surprised me. All that said these are the allegations you really can't see while there and they definitely put on a bit of a show for visitors.
 
Amazing how these labor groups throw out allegations and immediately everyone takes them for the gospel truth without even giving Apple the opportunity to respond. Also curious that this "news" comes out a few days before a major product launch. :rolleyes:

For everyone complaining in this thread, if it bothers you so much quit buying Apple products. Limit your purchase to companies that don't employee Chinese labor and pay workers what you consider a fair wage.


It would be very interesting to find out who's funding CLW. There's a definite fragrance to the timing of many of these reports.
Forbes, not exactly a friend of Apple and a source for many anti-Apple junk pieces, even had this to say recently:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2013/07/29/china-labor-watch-shouts-nonsense-at-apple-again/
 
Last edited:
Why am I not surprised by another story of labour irregularities by a Chinese supplier doing work for Apple. Apple should be hiring people to oversee these companies so they stay in compliance with Apple's conduct demands.

I agree. With Apples coffers overflowing with billions, they look awfully crass & insincere about improving conditions. Especially since they promised to address this during the "Photo OP" trip of months ago. Taking a page out of the politicians book of deceptive practices, it's obvious they're adept at saying one thing, but doing nothing to follow up.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.