Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Are there enough wannabe hipsters to make iWatch a success? Paying celebs to wear iWatch makes me think Apple has serious doubts.

Wannabe hipsters? WTF do fashion models have to do with hipsters? She'll probably end up being in an Apple commercial for the Watch in China, where I imagine it will be a huge seller since from what I understand the Chinese who have money like to flaunt it in visible ways.
 
No one who's into tech is excited about it, because it's not an exciting tech product.

You go to Paris Fashion Week and to fashion models and you try to make this ugly thing into a must have fashion accessory for desperate Vogue readers who buy fake Armani hand bags.

But that is exactly what they should do. People who are into fashion frequently wear watches. It isn't a stretch to get someone who already wears a watch to get an apple watch. People who wear watches because they are fashionable, might already own several watches. What is one more?

I haven't worn a watch since fourth grade. I am sure they would like me to buy one, but I don't think middle age, fat, plaid-wearing, non-exercising couch potatoes are their main target... yet.

I am not interested in one (yet - its all about the apps), but I don't have a problem with the product or the price.
 
Last edited:
So lame.

But it's the only way to sell this thing. No one who's into tech is excited about it, because it's not an exciting tech product.

That is your personal opinion. I'm personally excited for it. Granted I'm also poor so I'll have to wait a while but I do want one eventually.
 
Just curious, for those who aren't interested in the Apple Watch, could you tell me why? Were you ever interested in it? Did you not like the approach apple took? The design? What else would you realistically like to see from the Apple Watch that would make you excited? Lower price etc...anything.
 
So apple realised tech wise its no big deal so they try and market it as fashion.

Yeah bulky watch with huge knob, of course they have enough cash to get a lot of famous people to get it to wear & show .
 
Odd. For "slaves" people sure seem to work in those factories willingly. But of course, if you rode in there on your white horse, perhaps you can liberate them from those awful jobs so that they can go back to near-starvation working the fields so that you can feel better about yourself, despite what those employees want. :rolleyes:

That would be an issue for their government, nor American people!
 
Just curious, for those who aren't interested in the Apple Watch, could you tell me why?

1. The user interface is a confusing mess and it has to be controlled by constantly switching between 5 different input methods! Touchscreen, press touchscreen, a button, a little scroll wheel, clicking on the scroll wheel... this is insane!

2. It is nothing on its own. Has to have a constant connection to an iPhone that does everything the watch does but better AND faster.

3. Battery life is terrible.

4. Not water proof.

5. Way to fat. You can't even get it under a shirt sleeve.

6. The marketing campaign targeted at wannabe fashion victims at Paris Fashion Week is a real turn off too.
 
Just curious, for those who aren't interested in the Apple Watch, could you tell me why? Were you ever interested in it? Did you not like the approach apple took? The design? What else would you realistically like to see from the Apple Watch that would make you excited? Lower price etc...anything.

Lower price tag, yes.
Wearable tech has been tainted by goofy Google glass.
It’s technology that sits between you and other people… it feels to me that it’s too impersonal.
Although :apple:Watch is nowhere near aw impersonal as google glass.

Oh, and Segays!
segway-glass.jpg
 
Last edited:
Are there enough wannabe hipsters to make iWatch a success? Paying celebs to wear iWatch makes me think Apple has serious doubts.

Its a fashion accessory and a computer.

Models are used to sell fashion all the time. Maybe you live on another planet.

Apple, or anyone tech firm really, has never sold anything in the high end fashion sphere, so that's why you see new ways of selling things.

----------

1. The user interface is a confusing mess and it has to be controlled by constantly switching between 5 different input methods! Touchscreen, press touchscreen, a button, a little scroll wheel, clicking on the scroll wheel... this is insane!

2. It is nothing on its own. Has to have a constant connection to an iPhone that does everything the watch does but better AND faster.

3. Battery life is terrible.

4. Not water proof.

5. Way to fat. You can't even get it under a shirt sleeve.

6. The marketing campaign targeted at wannabe fashion victims at Paris Fashion Week is a real turn off too.


You haven't seen it, or used it yet you talk. That says everything.

----------

So apple realised tech wise its no big deal so they try and market it as fashion.

Yeah bulky watch with huge knob, of course they have enough cash to get a lot of famous people to get it to wear & show .

Less bulky that the 360 and has much higher specs, design and fit.

BTW, why not sell it as tech and fashion? Nothing precludes it. That's basically how high end cars are sold.
 
regular folks, every day people from different cultures and countries and stop thinking that people are going to buy things because a super model is attached to it.

Because people buy things based on celebrity and influence.

People do not buy things based one "regular folks".

thanks.
 
So lame.

But it's the only way to sell this thing. No one who's into tech is excited about it, because it's not an exciting tech product.

So what do you do?

You go to Paris Fashion Week and to fashion models and you try to make this ugly thing into a must have fashion accessory for desperate Vogue readers who buy fake Armani hand bags.

Right... No one. It has a custom SOC that nobody has, the best build, a new OS, two new input methods, a method of charging nobody else has, the best screen, etc. And that's only the things we know about. Man, nothing tech or new about this thing AT ALL.
 
Are there enough wannabe hipsters to make iWatch a success? Paying celebs to wear iWatch makes me think Apple has serious doubts.

Right now smart watches have a "nerd" vibe to them.

Nobody is going to buy them if they're seen as for nerds. Nerds are seen as undesirable and unattractive to most people.

The genre needs a fresh fashion approach if it wants to be taken seriously.
 
Sadly because you humans (;)) fall for the trick of believing that owning something owned by a "star" will make you like him or her. The product itself become secondary.

Star-power is not what this was about; otherwise, Apple easily could have gone to Hollywood stars, as they sometimes have in pitching other products. Ms. Wen is known for one thing: being a model, because she possesses the precise type of beauty sought after in the fashion marketing world.
 
I haven't worn a watch in over 20 years and could care less about making a fashion statement. So what will this watch do that an IPhone 6 won't ?

Just can't see the value of this for the masses.
 
1. The user interface is a confusing mess and it has to be controlled by constantly switching between 5 different input methods! Touchscreen, press touchscreen, a button, a little scroll wheel, clicking on the scroll wheel... this is insane!
1. How is it a confusing mess? Would you have rather had only a touch-based interface in which you fingers obstruct what's on the screen? BTW, apart from the digital crown, the :apple:Watch has less physical buttons than the iPhone, which has a fingerprint reader on top of a button, a power button, two volume buttons, and a switch.

2. It is nothing on its own. Has to have a constant connection to an iPhone that does everything the watch does but better AND faster.
2. The :apple:Watch was never meant to replace the smartphone/tablet that you constantly carry around and stare at all day. The watch is meant to be complementary and out of the way.

3. Battery life is terrible.
3. You make it sound like if there's other smart watches with better battery life.

4. Not water proof.
4. Ugh, really? How often were you planning to bathe with a watch on.

5. Way to fat. You can't even get it under a shirt sleeve.
5. Clearly you're just spewing what you've heard from others, since I'm sure you physically haven't tested that out.

6. The marketing campaign targeted at wannabe fashion victims at Paris Fashion Week is a real turn off too.
6. Fashion Week in Paris is about art and culture, which seems to me what Apple is trying to converge with technology. What's wrong with that.
 
I haven't worn a watch in over 20 years and could care less about making a fashion statement. So what will this watch do that an IPhone 6 won't ?

Just can't see the value of this for the masses.

With all due respect, why should the masses care about if you have or haven't worn a watch for any span? Also, why should they care what your priorities are for the watch? And who really anointed you as a tastemaker in the first place?
 
That :apple:Watch didn't look bulky at all on her. That's why I always wait to review products for myself. Of course I'll be checking out reviews before I purchase for more information. But I will never pre order a new product without seeing it for myself.

With that said. I can't wait to find out what apple is going to put into this :apple:Watch. Although battery life will be my deciding factor. Also, I may just buy one just to have collected the original. I think it will be worth some good money. But I've never collected anything ever. Funny that my first will be a tech gadget.
 
Last edited:
So lame.

But it's the only way to sell this thing. No one who's into tech is excited about it, because it's not an exciting tech product.

So what do you do?

You go to Paris Fashion Week and to fashion models and you try to make this ugly thing into a must have fashion accessory for desperate Vogue readers who buy fake Armani hand bags.

1. These watches are not ugly. If you think they are, you need an eye examination. 2. Vogue readers don't buy _fake_ Armani hand bags. They are not exactly expensive. 3. You are "into tech"? If you are "into tech" instead of "into technology" then _you_ are the desperate one. 4. If you are "into tech", Samsung has a watch for you. Apple will outsell them ten to one.

----------

A high end watch mage in china using slave labor! Now what will the Swiss and other high-end watch makers think?

Are you trying to be funny or insulting? I'd say you failed at both.
 
With all due respect, why should the masses care about if you have or haven't worn a watch for any span? Also, why should they care what your priorities are for the watch? And who really anointed you as a tastemaker in the first place?
I could care less what the masses think about my choices and am no means a "taste master".
Just wondering why anyone who is not "fashion orientated " would need to purchase an I watch if they already own an IP6 type phone.

Of course if Apple is looking to open an entirely new market it is understandable I just can't see the majority of current customers like me buying a technology that I already own with my IP6.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.