In the end, the lawyers win.
Someone already did the math and calculated it was cheaper to lose customers and the class action lawsuit than it would be to recall the laptops or cover repairs.
If you cover repairs after warranty expiration - then you're admitting fault.
Rule number 1: Maximize profit...
Rule number 2: follow rule number 1.
What about the 2012 non-retina MacBook Pros. Mine is a 2.6GHz 15.4" model with a 1440x900 display. The very last "non-retina" 15-inch MacBook Apple produced. I believe it is a 2012 model and not a 2011.
My 17" Mid-2009 MBP is also dead (NVIDIA 9600M GT, black screen after ≈ 2 years).
Yet, that's what they did to the 2008 and 2010 models. They set up a repair program to repair those affected models, why couldn't they do that for the 2011 model?
I had that problem, and Apple repaired it for free, out of warranty.
When the lead-free solder cracks it degrades the data flow between the GPU and the logic board.
Do you?
I've been in a few class action lawsuits - which neither makes me a lawyer or an expert on CALs, but I pay attention... Micron ram price fixing, Apple monitor size false advertising, iTunes book sale price fixing, and a few others...
Every time I've seen a pittance of a refund that accounts for a single percentage point of the amount of money I was wronged. But the lawyers get 40-50 million - which accounted for about 40% of the CAL.
And the defendant lawyers get paid, too.
So I stand by my "parroted myth" - the lawyers win.
I took it to the Apple Store and the genius said it was a problem with the display itself since the problem didn't occur on my external displays -- just on the MBP display. That didn't make sense to me. It definitely looked to me like it was a graphics card/logic board issue.
He said since my machine was five months out of the extended AppleCare warranty, it was going to cost several hundred dollars to have a new display installed. I wasn't going to do that since I was almost certain the problem was not related to the LCD itself but rather to the internals of the laptop.
In the end, the lawyers win.
Someone already did the math and calculated it was cheaper to lose customers and the class action lawsuit than it would be to recall the laptops or cover repairs.
If you cover repairs after warranty expiration - then you're admitting fault.
Rule number 1: Maximize profit...
Rule number 2: follow rule number 1.
Lawsuit? Quit whining and bake your logic board. Works wonders.
I'm curious why you'd respond to a topic that you clearly know nothing about?
Yet, that's what they did to the 2008 and 2010 models. They set up a repair program to repair those affected models, why couldn't they do that for the 2011 model?