definitely makes sense in a “computer”.... of any kind, than a phone. The masks have made me go back on the Touch ID bandwagon for phones.
I'm really surprised Apple hasn't done this yet since it's so obvious and would be such a cool "magic-like" feature, which we know Apple tends to be fond of.
I'm not disappointed. I'm really, really pissed off.I'm surprised and disappointed it wasn't included on my 16" 2019 MBP. After buying an iPad Pro and using it there, I'm now a believer compared to using Touch ID.
"Windows Hello" is the name of the biometric system Windows uses.I love faceID (or whatever windows calls it) on my HP Spectre x360 and the bezels isn't that big at all.
IMO, way overdue on the MacBook pro.
Edit: Here's a pic
View attachment 937091
FaceID would be amazing for an iMac used by multiple people.
Imagine sitting down in front of your iMac and it automatically unlocks YOUR session (or logs in if you haven't yet). You don't even have to tell it who you are. When you get up, it locks the screen after a few seconds. It would be seamless.
I'm really surprised Apple hasn't done this yet since it's so obvious and would be such a cool "magic-like" feature, which we know Apple tends to be fond of.
Huh, so that mockup looks a little different from what I was imagining, but it's still okay I guess.
View attachment 937078
It does make sense to start out with the iMac though, given that MacBooks already have built-in keyboards.
It's analogous to the iPhone lineup: TouchID for home button phones, FaceID for buttonless.
It does make sense to start out with the iMac though, given that MacBooks already have built-in keyboards.
i’ve never wholly bought that reasoning: I suspect that the true reason is that the Mac never had the Neural Engine before, which is necessary for Face ID
How will this work with desktop Macs or when a MacBook is docked?
I love faceID (or whatever windows calls it) on my HP Spectre x360 and the bezels isn't that big at all.
IMO, way overdue on the MacBook pro.
Edit: Here's a pic
View attachment 937091
Face ID makes much more sense than Touch ID for the Mac.
That means it'll come with MUCH better webcams. Bout time. Don't understand why they're stuck in the 2012s with their 720p FaceTime HD camera, even on their MacBook Pros.
Long passwords (16 characters or longer with letters numbers special characters etc) is still way secure than any biometric authentication methods to date, It’s just people don’t want to remember a long password, but willing to look at the computer to unlock.Do you think Apple will eventually stop requiring users to come up with passwords and use biometric authentication from start to finish? I assume the bad user passwords are a vulnerability. Is there something preventing the elimination of typed passwords or good reasons to keep using them forever?
But... but people say Windows hello can be fooled by a picture of you. Idk if it is real cause I still type password to authenticate.Not before @&@! time. My brand new $4,000 Macbook Pro doesn't have FaceID... but you can buy Windows PCs for as little as $500 that do. WTF?
![]()
Ten Windows 10 PCs that unlock Windows Hello
Today, we’re rounding up ten Windows 10 PCs from our partners across a variety of price points and form factors that unlock Windows Hello*.blogs.windows.com
I thought it would be coming to the iMac, but the prevailing argument was always that the MacBook lid is too thin to allow an improved webcam or a FaceID module.
My Dell laptop has "FaceID" and it's wonderful.Quite the opposite, in iPhones it makes sense while in Macs it doesn't make any sense at all, only when you wanna login your session. I want to actively "confirm" I'm making a bank/payment or whatever by using my fingerprint, and when I don't want to I just won't be doing it. But having a camera pointing at your face all day long just makes any confirmation de facto. And if to avoid that de facto confirmation they make you click somewhere/do something else, it basically takes away all that "comfyness" that FaceID would give you over touchID, which by the way is at the reach of your hand as any other key.
It seems to me that this "everything faster, more instant, easier!" spiral world is getting into doesn't have any end. Next thing will be Elon's Neuralink be like "using your hands? Eww, why would you make the effort when you just can control your computer with your thoughts!?"
Because people pays more for things they benefit from, and you perceive any direct benefit from letting others see you better. So people doesn't give a sh*t about computer's webcam quality, as they won't be taking selfies with it (they have their phone for that). Since Apple knows that and no one pressures them to improve those, they slap a dirt cheap 720p which cuts costs and gives them even more margins.
As someone who clamshells my MBP, like iMac users, I have to use an external keyboard. Be nice if they added Touch ID to there keyboards too.
Long passwords (16 characters or longer with letters numbers special characters etc) is still way secure than any biometric authentication methods to date, It’s just people don’t want to remember a long password, but willing to look at the computer to unlock.
[automerge]1595643570[/automerge]
But... but people say Windows hello can be fooled by a picture of you. Idk if it is real cause I still type password to authenticate.
Did anyone think FaceID wasn't coming to Macs?
It's too thick for MacBook Pro touchbar models. The display at the camera location is only about 1.8 mm thick if you take away the glass and metal casing.FaceID would be amazing for an iMac used by multiple people.
Imagine sitting down in front of your iMac and it automatically unlocks YOUR session (or logs in if you haven't yet). You don't even have to tell it who you are. When you get up, it locks the screen after a few seconds. It would be seamless.
I'm really surprised Apple hasn't done this yet since it's so obvious and would be such a cool "magic-like" feature, which we know Apple tends to be fond of.