I have to say those look really nice, now I'm not one for those airpods but the color does make them look sharp, not sharp willing to spend that much, but nice looking nonetheless.
Very, enough to see right through the thin air numbers you listed, see I can detect that stuff and not just blindly believe you
Right, that's why one never sees high-end automobiles in custom colours, in matte, with custom-coloured rims, custom neon, ....I doubt those people waste money on vanity colors let alone ugly air pods , they'll have common sense and smarts make that wage.
You mean in the inner cities or tijuana?Right, that's why one never sees high-end automobiles in custom colours, in matte, with custom-coloured rims, custom neon, ....
You don't have to believe me or the number.
Poor Timmy was asleep at the wheel focusing on more watch band colors when he missed this opportunity.
Putting on my psychologist hat I would deduce that people who protest so wildly about overpriced coloured airpods are negatively criticising them to make themselves feel better about not being able to afford them. For some reason they feel bitter about not being able to stump up the cost. Someone who could, would not feel the need to critique as harshly. It's like they're jealous of a neighbours new car.
Companies place premiums on coloured differentiations all the time. Cars. Furniture. Clothes Etc. It's an extension of personality. If there's a market. And people are willing. Why not. If it makes them happy.
Apple should offer more options that just plain white.
Didn't read the article? This is ColorWare's product, not Apple's.The insanity continues. The value to price ratio of Apple's products continue to diminish.
$289 - $159 = $130 for the colour...300 bucks... for a colour? The sad thing is, there are some people dumb enough to pay that.
Oops. I wasn't the first to notice that if you study hard and do well at maths, you can afford the nice things...No. It's $130 "for a color". The $289 price includes the AirPods. Ironic that you call other people dumb.
$289 - $159 = $130 for the colour...
But don't let that stop you from questioning other people's intelligence...
Some cars have different premiums placed on colour options particularly if vehicles are customised to a clients unique specification. Purchasers tend to base choice on colour not grade of paint. Maybe you haven't been privy to high end car purchases. But you sound like a trained used car salesman so you're probably rightWhere are you shopping? Unless its after market like these airpods most things don't have a markup based on colour. Yes new cars sometimes have an extra charge for certain coloured paints but it's usually the grade of paint not the colour itself. Example flat vs. metallic and its certainly not an 81% markup to the total cost of the car. I believe that's the main reason for the negativity. I think a lot of people in a mac forum can afford $300 but logically It doesn't make sense to pay an extra 81% for them to be a colour other than white. But you sound like a trained psychologist so you're probably right.
Didn't read the article? This is ColorWare's product, not Apple's.
Apple should offer more options that just plain white.
300 bucks... for a colour? The sad thing is, there are some people dumb enough to pay that.