Although I won't ge getting a new phone this year, that black chunk bitten out of the screen aptly referred to as "the notch" is atrocious. I would never be able to ignore it's hideousness. What a bad design choice. Horrible.
Is it just me or does the 8 plus look better?
I am 100% sure a real Dark Mode and some other fixes are coming in whatever iOS 11.x.x version will be there on release day of X. The whole point of OLED is much black to save energy.
But the question is, will it be on other iPhones too that support 11...
Wonder why in the left landscape comparison the X screen fills all the way to the right, yet in the other (Macrumours) it doesn't?Here is the iPhone 8 compared to the iPhone X. On this comparison the iPhone X wins.
Wonder why in the left landscape comparison the X screen fills all the way to the right, yet in the other (Macrumours) it doesn't?
It should always fill all the way to the right when in landscape.
On second glance, maybe it doesn't fill the right edge in the Macrumours comparison either?...![]()
The iPhone X offers the exact same width as the 4.7” model. You won’t be gaining anything.
here's a guide showing this in detail:
https://www.paintcodeapp.com/news/ultimate-guide-to-iphone-resolutions
Because the X is noticeably thinner.The X is much smaller than the plus, but the real estate is comparable. The X is basically the same size as the 8, but it has much more real estate. From a screen perspective I don't understand how there is even a conversation. Bring price into the equation and I get it. The X is more expensive. Yes people have a problem with the notch. That mystifies me, but differences in opinion are interesting. The plus remains a HUGE phone. But I have to acknowledge that so many people don't seem to mind. My son doesn't understand why I value the smallest possible form factor. Maybe it's because I remember being blown away by the StarTac phone. I am in the camp that would prefer an SE sized phone with X design. That would be perfection (for me).
But, screen real estate relative to device size... the X clearly has the advantage.
The X is much smaller than the plus, but the real estate is comparable. The X is basically the same size as the 8, but it has much more real estate. From a screen perspective I don't understand how there is even a conversation. Bring price into the equation and I get it. The X is more expensive. Yes people have a problem with the notch. That mystifies me, but differences in opinion are interesting. The plus remains a HUGE phone. But I have to acknowledge that so many people don't seem to mind. My son doesn't understand why I value the smallest possible form factor. Maybe it's because I remember being blown away by the StarTac phone. I am in the camp that would prefer an SE sized phone with X design. That would be perfection (for me).
But, screen real estate relative to device size... the X clearly has the advantage.
When you suggest that screen real estate of the X is comparable to the 8 Plus, I am curious, did you look at the screenshots in the very beginning of this thread? It is not comparable at all. The X is relatively an elongated 4.7" device that has ears at the top surrounding the notch. It is not nearly as wide as the 8 Plus. I totally understand the desire for an overall smaller device. I was craving the X to come out until I saw what the viewing experience will be. In landscape, because of the screen ratio, videos by default will be letter-boxed on a wider, and much less heightened screen. On the plus, that video will fill the entire 5.5" screen. If you choose to zoom on the X, you are now watching video that is hidden behind that notch and potentially cropped. I imagine most don't use safari in landscape, but have you seen how the each side of the content is letter-boxed with white wasted space? And how the home bar in instances actually blocks out text? The home bar is also capable of doing that in portrait use as well.
I imagine if someone is coming from an SE or a 4.7" phone, these things won't matter as much. But to suggest the real estate is comparable to the Plus model simply would not be accurate. The proof is in the screen shots (not the ones where the X is compared to the regular 8).
When you suggest that screen real estate of the X is comparable to the 8 Plus, I am curious, did you look at the screenshots in the very beginning of this thread? It is not comparable at all. The X is relatively an elongated 4.7" device that has ears at the top surrounding the notch. It is not nearly as wide as the 8 Plus. I totally understand the desire for an overall smaller device. I was craving the X to come out until I saw what the viewing experience will be. In landscape, because of the screen ratio, videos by default will be letter-boxed on a wider, and much less heightened screen. On the plus, that video will fill the entire 5.5" screen. If you choose to zoom on the X, you are now watching video that is hidden behind that notch and potentially cropped. I imagine most don't use safari in landscape, but have you seen how the each side of the content is letter-boxed with white wasted space? And how the home bar in instances actually blocks out text? The home bar is also capable of doing that in portrait use as well.
I imagine if someone is coming from an SE or a 4.7" phone, these things won't matter as much. But to suggest the real estate is comparable to the Plus model simply would not be accurate. The proof is in the screen shots (not the ones where the X is compared to the regular 8).
It does feel like the X is Apples experiment on testing the limits of its userbaseThis confirms my thoughts. In reality, the X is a beta release. Has lots to sort out before it's ready for prime time. The 8 Plus is the safe choice for now for most consumers.
Yes in portait mode the 5.8 will be ideal, and the next year 6.5” will come with ,hoping some ipad landscape mode,like today dock summon etc
Maybe it's because I remember being blown away by the StarTac phone. I am in the camp that would prefer an SE sized phone with X design. That would be perfection (for me).
I totally see your point. I store all of personal videos I’ve taken of my daughter, pets, concerts, etc. on my phone and sometimes go on a YouTube binge. So it basically has become my phone/tablet of sorts. Had I not gotten used to this screen, I think I most certainly would have gone X in order to have a new design and all of the bells and whistles. It will be interesting to see what choices we are given come next fall (good grief I cannot possibly be thinking about the next release already).I certainly get that. I am a home theater aficionado and understand resolutions. If serious video watching is important, that makes sense. I don't do serious video watching on an iPhone. I haven't done that since the iPad came out. I only watch stupid short videos on facebook or attachments or videos I film on the iPhone. Any serious mobile viewing is on my iPad. I can see the greater concern with this is mind. The 8+ may be better suited for someone who uses it as a small iPad.
This might give you a bit of an idea only it's in 16:9, I got screen measurements and took a picture and then screen shot, just wanted to see what video would be like in 16:9 compared to a plus, if you have a plus zoom picture to outside lineIs there any info on the physical dimension of the X screen, as in mm x mm size? I know they have rounded corner, but looking at comparing it this way over a plus iPhone.
Thanks
It does feel like the X is Apples experiment on testing the limits of its userbase
- Fixing "problems" that were never considered problems (TouchID)
- Using gimmicks as selling points (Animoji)
- Intentionally hording features (dual OIS on X only?!?)
- Raising device prices to test consumer acceptance
As a product then I can see the appeal of the X. A larger screen in a smaller frame is great. But, in thinking of how logically the Button and Screen iPhone has evolved in the last decade then.... maybe this new modern revision is unnecessary because Apple got it right the first time.