Oh and a shout out to everybody who joined in the noise. This wouldn't have happened without clear pushback and Pro customers voting (or not voting) with their wallets.
Honestly, I feel like maybe SJ would have fired Phill Schiller over this. Going from "can't innovate anymore my ass" while releasing it to "well, we designed ourselves into a corner" just a few years later. They obviously did not get user input AT ALL before designing the Pro, instead opting for form over function.
Unfortunately, it appears the R&D side of this company died with SJ.
This must be really difficult for you. You are stuck in a a logical catch-22, like a classic episode of Star Trek - Apple is always right. But if Apple admitted they are wrong, then Apple can't always be right. But Apple is always right. But if Apple admitted they are wrong, then Apple can't always be right. But Apple is always right.Tons of people dissed the iPhone, the iPad, the lack of flash support, everything Apple did. Apple wasn't immune to criticism back when Steve Jobs was at the helm, so I don't quite see what is different here.
I definitely agree with this. If R&D hasn't died, it's certainly adrift without a captain.There's an empty leadership void at Apple that's allowed so many in the upper echelons to take their foot off the gas pedal. What output we have now is the result of that.
This must be really difficult for you. You are stuck in a a logical catch-22, like a classic episode of Star Trek - Apple is always right. But if Apple admitted they are wrong, then Apple can't always be right. But Apple is always right. But if Apple admitted they are wrong, then Apple can't always be right. But Apple is always right.
*SHORT CIRCUIT*
Thank you. This can't be stated enough. The Pro's Pros have pretty much already moved on.Also, I'm biased toward post-production, but I cannot overstate the impact that the initial rollout of FCPX plus these machines had on that industry. The nMP was the hardware equivalent of FCPX. Apple might not have actually cared, but the combination of the two releases permanently changed post-production, and pissed off a lot of people in the process.
This is also why I don't know how much of an impact this new Mac Pro will possibly have. Maybe there many other industries with the ability to wait it out, but post has walked. And I say that as somebody that, for better or worse, runs a 100% FCPX shop using nMP's.
How long can it take to put modern tech into the old Mac Pro![]()
Well, it won't be a tashcan this time, so they'll have to come up with something new. Maybe a tent?Why would it take 2 more years to develop a desktop?
i'm pretty sure they already made alternative design studies before they decided on the 2013 MP. (rackmount rumors, anyone? not going to happen anyway). there's also the beloved cheese-grater design that could just use a few tweaks. hardware-components form factors have remained largely the same since then. so, depending on what they already have, we might actually see something next year. or not.
Tons of people dissed the iPhone, the iPad, the lack of flash support, everything Apple did. Apple wasn't immune to criticism back when Steve Jobs was at the helm, so I don't quite see what is different here.
2 years for a desktop?!? Holy crap Apple. I appreciate that Apple doesn't (usually) release half baked products, but 2 years to make a desktop which will be made up of mostly off the shelf parts in an Apple designed Shell seems a little outrageous.
??? The MacBook Pro is pretty practical. I wonder how much of the negativity could have been avoided if they provided a dock in the box that included a USB-A port and Thunderbolt 2. TB3/USB-C are clearly the future.
Dear God no. Dells are absolute **** and don't belong in the same sentence as Apple. They need to go out in the trash where they belong.For GOD"S SAKE, Apple -- Just go take a Dell Precision 7810 Tower, throw an Apple logo over the "DELL", make it run macOS and be done with it. You should have that ready by, what? June or July? Thank you, that is all we really need.
The ports are just a convenient excuse. The price is the bigger deal, particularly since it doesn't come with any of the legacy adapters. The original MacBook Air shipped with display adapters, and the iPhone 7 shipped with the headphone jack adapter. We don't hear many complaints about the audio jack on the iPhone 7. Apple should include a dock in the box for next year's version and lower the price a bit.
The difference is, history proved most of those people wrong. It's 2017, and the initial trash can complaints are more valid than ever before. Apple probably assumed that, with time, the nMP would become a new industry standard and those complaints would eventually sound misplaced.
Also, I'm biased toward post-production, but I cannot overstate the impact that the initial rollout of FCPX plus these machines had on that industry. The nMP was the hardware equivalent of FCPX. Apple might not have actually cared, but the combination of the two releases permanently changed post-production, and pissed off a lot of people in the process.
This is also why I don't know how much of an impact this new Mac Pro will possibly have. Maybe there many other industries with the ability to wait it out, but post has walked. And I say that as somebody that, for better or worse, runs a 100% FCPX shop using nMP's.
Yeah - Apple's thinnest 'desktop' yet will come with four legs and look just like a table - people will walk by your desk - see your monitor and keyboard - and then ask you where the computer is.They need time to design its thinness.
Glad Apple is listening.
As Pro user they for sure dropped the ball on the Mac for many years. I am still using my MacPro 2011 12 core tower and the machine still rocks. It is just 1 sec slower that the current MPs. Upgrading the internals is the key for the success. Soldering everything is a huge mistake.
As I mentioned in another post, appropriate CPU and GPU improvements have been pretty darn slim during those 3 years.
I thought the new MacBook Pro broke sales records when it was released? Don't tell me that now it's not true. And why on earth did they spend all that time on the trash can, non upgradeable design for the Mac Pro? And now they are saying, hey guys, we goofed, just hang in there for a couple of more years while we get our act together. In the meantime, you can keep buying the outdated model knowing we never should have made it in the first place. We care about our pro customers!!
Don't forget, the Mac Pro was already a year, if not more, behind in tech when it was released!!!