Sue me.
No my job. Doing this violates a United States Federal Law. It is the job of the Justice Department to jail persons who do this.
Sue me.
No my job. Doing this violates a United States Federal Law. It is the job of the Justice Department to jail persons who do this.
You wouldn't have a leg to stand on![]()
(4) knowingly and with intent to defraud, accesses a protected computer without authorization, or exceeds authorized access, and by means of such conduct furthers the intended fraud and obtains anything of value, unless the object of the fraud and the thing obtained consists only of the use of the computer and the value of such use is not more than $5,000 in any 1-year period;
(5)
(A) knowingly causes the transmission of a program, information, code, or command, and as a result of such conduct, intentionally causes damage without authorization, to a protected computer;
(B) intentionally accesses a protected computer without authorization, and as a result of such conduct, recklessly causes damage; or
(C) intentionally accesses a protected computer without authorization, and as a result of such conduct, causes damage;
(1)
(A) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than ten years, or both, in the case of an offense under subsection (a)(1) of this section which does not occur after a conviction for another offense under this section, or an attempt to commit an offense punishable under this subparagraph; and
(B) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than twenty years, or both, in the case of an offense under subsection (a)(1) of this section which occurs after a conviction for another offense under this section, or an attempt to commit an offense punishable under this subparagraph; and
(2)
(A) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than one year, or both, in the case of an offense under subsection (a)(2), (a)(3), (a)(5)(C), or (a)(6) of this section which does not occur after a conviction for another offense under this section, or an attempt to commit an offense punishable under this subparagraph; and
(B) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than 5 years, or both, in the case of an offense under subsection (a)(2), if--
(i) the offense was committed for purposes of commercial advantage or private financial gain;
(ii) the offense was committed in furtherance of any criminal or tortious act in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States or of any State; or
(iii) the value of the information obtained exceeds $5,000;
(C) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than ten years, or both, in the case of an offense under subsection (a)(2), (a)(3) or (a)(6) of this section which occurs after a conviction for another offense under this section, or an attempt to commit an offense punishable under this subparagraph; and
(3)
(A) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than five years, or both, in the case of an offense under subsection (a)(4), (a)(5)(A), (a)(5)(B), or (a)(7) of this section which does not occur after a conviction for another offense under this section, or an attempt to commit an offense punishable under this subparagraph; and
(B) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than ten years, or both, in the case of an offense under subsection (a)(4), (a)(5)(A), (a)(5)(B), (a)(5)(C), or (a)(7)of this section which occurs after a conviction for another offense under this section, or an attempt to commit an offense punishable under this subparagraph
So what do we do? If we leave the pirates alone, they will continue to grow and proliferate.
Actually this will happen either way.
See, despite 20+ years of anti-piracy efforts the "scene" has continued to expand, year after year. As long as computers have IO devices people will pirate software. It's that simple.
You can involve the cops. A few pirates will get busted. The rest will get trickier.
You can play at being a vigilante. A few pirates will get burned by your tricks. The rest will ignore you (and possibly harass you.) Depending on what you do, you might end up in legal trouble.
You can add layer after layer of DRM to your apps. The pirates will crack it. Your legitimate users won't, and they're the ones you'll piss off. The more DRM you add, the better you make the pirated product in comparison.
You can't stop piracy. As the iPhone gains more users so too will it gain more pirates. That's the nature of the software industry. Sorry.
Zippher, the OP, is known throughout the community as "Haklab". He's long-attempted to take these sites down, and most of his attempts involve lying to actual iphone developers, trying to get them to do the work for him. In reality, he doesn't even appear to be a developer himself. His actions have progressed to such a pathetic level that he's little more than a joke to the community he's laughably trying to remove from the Internet.
People here are quoting US law. US law does not apply in The Netherlands, where the majority of these sites are hosted. RESEARCH.
ppc750fx, this is not meant to sound aggressive, but honestly I don't need another person to tell me that there isn't a solution. Even a temporary solution is better than nothing.
If someone were to write one app that does some damage to a person's iPhone and post it on these websites posing as another app, people will download it, install it and realize that it isn't safe to download these apps. The "White Hat" approach to hacking/piracy DOES work.
Me? I'm an iPhone developer, with two apps in the app store. I stay quiet, I don't challenge the cracking community (I have a chuckle every time I see a developer "daring" the cracking community to try to crack their release. What exactly are they gaining by doing that?), and I generally keep my apps ahead of what's common in their cracking "scene". Ten minutes a day lets you understand their sites and keeps you up with what the pirates are up to, and I've had relatively decent success in staying clear of mass piracy just from that alone.I'm assuming you're at some way affiliated with the site.
Oh goodness Hacklab, they banned you at Hackulous and you got so desperate for attention you had to come trolling here? You're so pathetic. And they'll always be steps ahead of you, no matter what "Plan" you hatch. If buying their servers out from under them didn't work, this little stunt is likely to fail as well.
Actually this will happen either way.
See, despite 20+ years of anti-piracy efforts the "scene" has continued to expand, year after year. As long as computers have IO devices people will pirate software. It's that simple.
You can involve the cops. A few pirates will get busted. The rest will get trickier.
You can play at being a vigilante. A few pirates will get burned by your tricks. The rest will ignore you (and possibly harass you.) Depending on what you do, you might end up in legal trouble.
You can add layer after layer of DRM to your apps. The pirates will crack it. Your legitimate users won't, and they're the ones you'll piss off. The more DRM you add, the better you make the pirated product in comparison.
You can't stop piracy. As the iPhone gains more users so too will it gain more pirates. That's the nature of the software industry. Sorry.
You CAN stop piracy easily with an app that requires connecting to a developer's server to work. If only Apple would provide license keys upon the initial download of the app.
we dont want this.
You CAN stop piracy easily with an app that requires connecting to a developer's server to work. If only Apple would provide license keys upon the initial download of the app.
What did he try to do?
I agree, Siffen's soultion seems quite reasonable. As a matter of fact, I'd be interested in buying a few apps of his. Unlike Haklab's. Those will never be bought by me.